Contents
1.3 Construction
Works Status in the Reporting Period
1.4 Summary
of EM&A Requirements and Alternative Monitoring Locations
1.4.2 Alternative
Monitoring Locations
2 Impact
Monitoring Methodology
2.2.1 Monitoring
Parameters, Frequency and Duration
2.3.1 Monitoring
Parameters, Frequency and Duration
3.4 Landscape
and Visual Impact
4 Site
Environmental Management
4.1.1 Zones 2A, 2B
& 2C (Contract No.: CC/2023/2B/095)
4.2 Advice on the Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status
4.2.1 Zones 2A, 2B & 2C (Contract No.: CC/2023/2B/095)
4.3 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits
4.3.1 Zones
2A, 2B & 2C (Contract No.:
CC/2023/2B/095)
4.4 Recommended
Mitigation Measures
4.4.1 Zones 2A, 2B
& 2C (Contract No.:
CC/2023/2B/095)
5 Compliance
with Environmental Permit
6 Report
in Non-compliance, Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful
Prosecutions
6.1 Record
on Non-compliance of Action and Limit Levels
6.2 Record
on Environmental Complaints Received
6.3 Record
on Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecution
7.1 Construction Works for the Coming Month(s)
7.2 Key
Issues for the Coming Month
7.2.1 Zones 2A, 2B
& 2C (Contract No.: CC/2023/2B/095)
7.3 Monitoring Schedule for the
Coming Month
8 Conclusions
and Recommendations
Figure 1 Site Layout Plan and
Monitoring Stations
B. Tentative Construction
Programme
C. Action and Limit Levels for
Construction Phase
D. Event and Action Plan for Air
Quality, Noise, Landscape and Visual Impact
G. Graphical Plots of the
Monitoring Results
H. Meteorological Data Extracted
from Hong Kong Observatory
J. Environmental Mitigation
Measures – Implementation Status
K. Cumulative Statistics on
Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
Apex
Testing & Certification Limited (Apex) was commissioned to undertake the
Environmental Team (ET) services (including environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A)
for the construction activities in Zone 2A, consisting of Foundation,
Excavation and Lateral Support Works for Integrated Basement and Underground
Road (Contract No.: GW/2020/05/073); Zone 2B & 2C consisting of Piling
Works for Integrated Basement and Underground Road (Contract No.:
CC/2020/2B/088); and Zones 2A, 2B & 2C consisting of Excavation and Lateral
Support Works (Stages 1 & 2) for The Integrated Basement and Underground
Road (Contract No.: CC/2023/2B/095) at WKCD. The construction works and
EM&A programme for Zone 2A (Contract No.: GW/2020/05/073) was commenced on
03 October 2020 and handed over on 31 March 2023; while the construction works
and EM&A programme for Zone 2B & 2C (Contract No.: CC/2020/2B/088) was
commenced on 30 September 2021 and handed over on 05 July 2024. The
construction works and EM&A programme for Zones 2A, 2B & 2C (Contract No.: CC/2023/2B/095) was commenced
on 05 July 2024.
The Project Proponent is the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority (WKCDA). The overall works for the WKCD fall under two separate categories of Designated Project (DP) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), namely an “engineering feasibility study of urban development projects with a study area covering more than 20 ha or involving a total population of more than 100 000” (Item 1 of Schedule 3) and “an underpass more than 100m in length under the built areas” (Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2). An Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/A (EP) was issued with respect to the “Underpass Road and Austin Road Flyover Serving the West Kowloon Cultural District” which specifically includes the abovementioned category of DP under Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO.
This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works
at Zones 2A, 2B & 2C from 01 to 30 October
2024.
Exceedance
of Action and Limit Levels
There was no breach of Action or Limit levels for Air Quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and Construction Noise in this reporting month.
Implementation of Mitigation Measures
Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 02, 09, 16, 23 and 30 October 2024 for Excavation and Lateral Support Works in Zones 2A, 2B & 2C to confirm the implementation measures undertaken by the Contractors in the reporting month. The outcomes are presented in Section 4 and the status of implementation of mitigation measures in the site is shown in Appendix J.
Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the abovementioned weekly site inspections during the reporting month. No adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.
Record of Complaints
No environmental
complaints were recorded in the reporting month.
Record of Notifications of Summons and
Successful Prosecutions
No notifications of summons and successful prosecutions were recorded in the reporting month.
Future Key Issues
The major site works for Zones 2A, 2B & 2C scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month
include:
· Ground Investigation Works and Pipe Piling Works
Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities, including air, noise, water quality, waste, landscape and visual, will be monitored or reviewed. The recommended environmental mitigation measures shall be implemented on site and regular inspections as required will be carried out to ensure that the environmental conditions are acceptable.
Apex
Testing & Certification Limited (Apex) was commissioned to undertake the
Environmental Team (ET) services (including environmental monitoring and audit
(EM&A)) for the construction activities in Zone 2A, consisting of Foundation,
Excavation and Lateral Support Works for Integrated Basement and Underground
Road (Contract No.: GW/2020/05/073); Zone 2B & 2C consisting of Piling
Works for Integrated Basement and Underground Road (Contract No.:
CC/2020/2B/088); and Zones 2A, 2B & 2C consisting of Excavation and Lateral
Support Works (Stages 1 & 2) for The Integrated Basement and Underground
Road (Contract No.: CC/2023/2B/095) at WKCD. The purpose of the development in
Zone 2A and Zone 2B & 2C is to reserve for Integrated Basement (IB) and
Underground Road (UR). The Zone 2A construction activities involve the
foundation, excavation and lateral support (ELS) works, road works, drainage
diversion works, and temporary car parking. The Zone 2B & 2C construction
activities involve the piling works. The construction works and EM&A
programme for Zone 2A (Contract No.: GW/2020/05/073) was commenced on 03
October 2020 and handed over on 31 March 2023; while the construction works and
EM&A programme for Zone 2B & 2C (Contract No.: CC/2020/2B/088) was
commenced on 30 September 2021 and handed over on 05 July 2024. The
construction works and EM&A programme for Zones 2A, 2B & 2C (Contract No.: CC/2023/2B/095) was commenced
on 05 July 2024.
The
overall works for the WKCD fall under two separate categories of Designated
Project (DP) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), namely an
“engineering feasibility study of urban development projects with a study area
covering more than 20 ha or involving a total population of more than 100 000”
(Item 1 of Schedule 3) and “an underpass more than 100m in length under the
built areas” (Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2). An Environmental Permit No.
EP-453/2013/A (EP) was issued with respect to the “Underpass Road and Austin
Road Flyover Serving the West Kowloon Cultural District” which specifically
includes the abovementioned category of DP under Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2
of the EIAO. The captioned projects include part of the abovementioned
underpass road located within the site boundary falls under this same category.
The Monthly EM&A Report is prepared in accordance with the Condition 3.4 of the Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/A. This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works at 2A, 2B & 2C from 01 to 31 October 2024. The purpose of this report is to summarise the findings in the EM&A of the project over the reporting period.
The
organisation chart and lines of communication with respect to the on-site
environmental management structure together with the contact information of the
key personnel are shown in Appendix A.
During the reporting period, construction works at Zones 2A, 2B & 2C undertaken include:
· Ground Investigation Works and Pipe Piling Works
The
Construction Works Programme of Zones
2A, 2B & 2C is provided in Appendix B. A
layout plan of the Project is provided in Figure 1. Please refer to Table 4.3 on
the status of the environmental licenses.
The EM&A programme requires environmental monitoring of air quality, noise, landscape and visual as specified in the approved EM&A Manual.
A summary of impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1: Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
Parameters |
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Air Quality |
24-Hours TSP |
AM3-The Victoria Towers Tower 1 |
At least once every 6 days |
1-Hour TSP |
AM3-The Victoria Towers Tower 1 |
At least 3 times every 6 days |
|
24-Hours TSP |
AM4-Canton Road Government Primary School |
At least once every 6 days |
|
1-Hour TSP |
AM4-Canton Road Government Primary School |
At least 3 times every 6 days |
|
24-Hours TSP |
AM5-Topside Developments at West Kowloon Terminus Site |
At least once every 6 days |
|
1-Hour TSP |
AM5-Topside Developments at West Kowloon Terminus Site |
At least 3 times every 6 days |
|
Noise |
Leq, 30 minutes |
NM2-The Arch, Sun Tower |
Weekly |
Leq, 30 minutes |
NM3-The Victoria Towers Tower 1 |
Weekly |
|
Leq, 30 minutes |
NM4-Canton Road Government Primary School |
Weekly |
|
Leq, 30 minutes |
NM5-Development next to Austin Station |
Weekly |
|
Landscape & Visual |
Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation measures during the
construction stage |
As described in Table 9.1 and 9.2 of the EM&A Manual |
Bi-Weekly |
The EM&A programme for the Project should require 5 noise monitoring
station and 5 air quality monitoring stations located closest to the Project
area. With regard to the
monitoring activities at M+ Museum and the Lyric Complex, three monitoring
stations had been considered, including AM1 (International Commerce Centre),
AM2 (The Harbourside Tower 1) for air monitoring, and NM1 (The Harbourside
Tower 1) for noise monitoring.
In the context of the construction activities in Zone 2A and Zone
2B & 2C, all other monitoring locations including AM3 (The
Victoria Towers Tower 1), AM4 (Canton Road Government Primary School), and AM5 (Topside Developments at West
Kowloon Terminus Site) for air monitoring; and NM2 (The Arch, Sun
Tower), NM3 (The Victoria Towers Tower 1), NM4 (Canton Road Government Primary
School) and NM5 (Development next to Austin Station) for noise monitoring, have been taken into account. However, access to all these
originally designated monitoring stations was declined as described below
point-by-point.
The Arch management office and owners’
committee have formally declined the proposal of setting up noise monitoring
instrument on its premises at the podium level of Sun Tower (NM2) on 24 July
2014. Thus, alternative noise monitoring location was
identified at the ground floor in front of The Arch – Sun Tower (NM2A), which is at the same location as stated in
the EM&A Manual for consistency. No management approval is required at the ground
floor for conducting the noise monitoring. This alternative air
monitoring location was approved by EPD on 29 September 2020.
The Victoria Towers management office
formally declined the proposal of setting up air quality
and noise monitoring instruments on its premises at the podium area of
Tower 1 (AM3/NM3) on 16 June 2020. Alternative air monitoring location was
identified at ground floor at the Northeast corner of West Kowloon Station’s
station box (AM3A), in the same direction to the area of major construction
site activities in Zone 2A. This alternative air monitoring location was
approved by EPD on 29 September 2020. An alternative noise monitoring location
was identified at the ground floor in front of the Xiqu
Centre (NM3A), which is set closer to the construction site boundary with more
direct line sight to the major site activities and higher exposure to the
construction noise with no disturbance to the premises’ occupants during noise
monitoring activities. No management approval is required at the ground floor
for conducting the noise monitoring. This alternative air monitoring location
was approved by EPD on 29 September 2020.
Canton Road Government Primary School formally
declined the proposal of setting up air quality and
noise monitoring instruments on
its premise at the podium level (AM4/NM4) on 16 June 2020. Alternative air monitoring location was
identified at ground floor at the Southeast
corner of West Kowloon Station’s station box (AM4A), in same
direction to the area of major construction site activities in Zone 2A. This
alternative air monitoring location was approved by EPD on 29 September 2020. An
alternative noise monitoring location was identified at the ground floor next
to Tsim Sha Tsui Fire Station (NM4A), which is set
closer to the construction site boundary with more direct line sight to the
major site activities and higher exposure to the construction noise with no
disturbance to the premises’ occupants during noise
monitoring activities. No management approval is required at the ground floor
for conducting the noise monitoring. This alternative air monitoring location
was approved by EPD on 29 September 2020.
MTR also formally declined the access to the
designated AM5 location (topside developments at West Kowloon Terminus Site) on
15 July 2020. Alternative air monitoring location was identified at ground
floor at the North of West
Kowloon Station’s station box (AM5A), in same direction to the area of
major construction site activities in Zone 2A. This alternative air monitoring
location was approved by EPD on 29 September 2020.
Grand Austin property management office formally
declined our proposal of setting up noise monitoring instrument on
its premises at the podium level (NM5) on 10 July 2020. Alternative noise
monitoring location was identified at the Pedestrian road
(ground floor) outside West Kowloon Station (NM5A), which is set closer to the construction site boundary with more direct
line sight to the major site activities and higher exposure to the construction
noise with no disturbance to the premises’ occupants during noise monitoring
activities. No management approval is required at the ground floor for
conducting the noise monitoring. This alternative air monitoring location was
approved by EPD on 29 September 2020.
The Environmental Quality Performance Limits for air quality and noise are shown in Appendix C.
The Event and Action Plan for air quality, construction noise, and landscape and visual are shown in Appendix D.
The EM&A programme followed the
recommended mitigation measures in the EM&A Manual. The EM&A
requirements as well as the summary of implementation status of the
environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix
J.
Air quality and noise monitoring methodology,
including the monitoring locations, equipment used, parameters, frequency and
duration etc., are described in this Section. The environmental monitoring
schedules for the reporting period and the tentative monitoring Schedule for
the coming month are provided in Appendix
E.
The relevant EM&A monitoring
requirements and details for landscape and audit impact, are also presented in
this Section.
Table 2.1 summarizes the monitoring parameters,
frequency and duration of the TSP monitoring.
Table 2.1: Air Quality
Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Parameter |
Frequency |
Duration |
24-hour
TSP |
At
least once in every six-days |
24
hours |
1-hour
TSP |
At
least 3 times every six-days |
60
minutes |
Monitoring
stations and locations are given in Table 2.2 and
shown in Figure 1.
Table 2.2: Air Quality Monitoring Station
Monitoring
Station |
Location
Description |
AM3A |
Northeast
corner of West Kowloon Station’s station box (G/F) |
AM4A |
Southeast
corner of West Kowloon Station’s station box (G/F) |
AM5A |
North
of West Kowloon Station’s station box (G/F) |
Continuous 24-hour TSP air quality monitoring was conducted using High Volume Sampler (HVS) (Model: TE-5170) located at the designated monitoring station. The HVS meets all the requirements stated in of the EM&A Manual. Portable direct reading dust meter was used to carry out the 1-hour TSP monitoring. Table 2.3 summarizes the equipment used in the impact air quality monitoring. Copies of the calibration certificates for the HVS, calibration kit and portable dust meters are attached in Appendix F.
Table 2.3: TSP Monitoring
Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
24-hour TSP monitoring |
|
High
Volume Sampler |
TE-5170
(Serial No.: 4340;
3998; 4344) |
Calibrator |
TE-5025A
(Orifice I.D.: 4088) |
1-hour
TSP monitoring |
|
Portable
direct reading dust meter |
Sibata-LD-3B (Serial No.: 276004, 336338, 476672) |
Calibration of the HVS (five-point calibration) using
Calibration Kit was carried out every two months. The HVS calibration orifice
will be calibrated annually. Calibration certificate of the TE-5025A
Calibration Kit and the HVS are provided in Appendix
F.
The 1-hour TSP monitoring should be determined periodically (e.g. annually) by the HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method.
24-hour
TSP Monitoring
Installation
The HVS was installed at the site boundary. The following criteria were considered in the installation of the HVS.
– A horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the sampler against gusty wind was provided.
– The distance between the HVS and any obstacles, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the HVS.
– A minimum of 2 metres separation from walls, parapets and penthouse was required for rooftop sampler.
– A minimum of 2 metres separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally was required.
– No furnace or incinerator flues or building vent were nearby.
– Airflow around the sampler was unrestricted.
– The sampler has been more than 20 metres from any drip line.
– Permission was obtained to set up the sampler and to obtain access to the monitoring station.
– A secured supply of electricity is needed to operate the sampler.
Preparation of Filter Papers
– Glass fibre filters were labelled and sufficient filters that were clean and without pinholes were selected.
– The filters used are specified to have a minimum collection efficiency of 99 percent for 0.3 µm (DOP) particles.
– All filters were equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing. The conditioning environment temperature was around 25 °C and not variable by more than ±3 °C with relative humidity (RH) < 50% and was not variable by more than ±5 %. A convenient working RH was 40%. All preparation of filters was done by Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory.
Field Monitoring Procedures
– The power supply was checked to ensure the HVS works properly.
– The filter holder and the area surrounding the filter were cleaned.
– The filter holder was removed by loosening the four bolts and a new filter, with stamped number upward, on a supporting screen was aligned carefully.
– The filter was properly aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter.
– The swing bolts were fastened to hold the filter holder down to the frame. The pressure applied should be sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.
– The shelter lid was closed and was secured with the aluminium strip.
– The HVS was warmed-up for about 5 minutes to establish run-temperature conditions.
– A new flow rate record sheet was set into the flow recorder.
– The flow rate of the HVS was checked and adjusted at around 1.3 m3/min. The range specified in the EM&A Manual was between 0.6-1.7 m3/min.
– The programmable timer was set for a sampling period of 24 hours, and the starting time, weather condition and the filter number were recorded.
– The initial elapsed time was recorded.
– At the end of sampling, the sampled filter was removed carefully and folded in half length so that only surfaces with collected particulate matter were in contact.
– It was then placed in a clean plastic envelope and sealed.
– All monitoring information was recorded on a standard data sheet.
– Filters were sent to a Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory for analysis.
Maintenance and Calibration
– The HVS and its accessories are maintained in good working condition, such as replacing motor brushes routinely and checking electrical wiring to ensure a continuous power supply.
– HVSs were calibrated upon installation and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals. The calibration kits were calibrated annually.
– Calibration records for HVS and calibration kit are shown in Appendix F.
1-hour
TSP Monitoring
Field Monitoring
The
measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with the
Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:
– Turn the power on.
– Close the air collecting opening cover.
– Push the “TIME SETTING” switch to [BG].
– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform background measurement for 6 seconds.
– Turn the knob at SENSI ADJ position to insert the light scattering plate.
– Leave the equipment for 1 minute upon “SPAN CHECK” is indicated in the display.
– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform automatic sensitivity adjustment. This measurement takes 1 minute.
– Pull out the knob and return it to MEASURE position.
– Setting time period of 1 hour for the 1-hour TSP measurement.
– Push “START/STOP” to start the 1-hour TSP measurement.
– Regular checking of the time period setting to ensure monitoring time of 1 hour.
Maintenance and Calibration
– The 1-hour dust meter would be checked at 3-month intervals and calibrated at 1-year intervals throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.
– Calibration records for direct dust meters are shown in Appendix F.
Weather Condition
– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.
Table 2.4 summarizes the monitoring parameters,
frequency and duration of noise monitoring. The noise in A-weighted levels Leq, L10 and L90 are
recorded in a 30-minute interval between 0700 and 1900 hours.
Table 2.4: Noise Monitoring Parameters, Period and Frequency
Time Period |
Parameters |
Frequency |
Daytime on normal weekdays (0700-1900 hours) |
Leq(30
min), L90(30 min) & L10(30 min) |
Once every week |
Note: *70 dB(A) for schools and 65 dB(A) during school examination
periods.
If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions
stipulated in the Construction Noise Permit (CNP) issued by the Noise Control
Authority have to be followed.
Noise monitoring stations and locations are given in Table 2.5 and shown in Figure 1.
Table 2.5: Noise Monitoring Station
Monitoring Station |
Location |
NM2A |
|
NM3A |
|
NM4A |
Next to Tsim Sha Tsui Fire Station (G/F) |
NM5A |
Pedestrian road (G/F) outside West Kowloon Station |
Integrating Sound Level Meter was used for noise monitoring. It was a Type 1 sound level meter capable of giving a continuous readout of the noise level readings including equivalent continuous sound pressure level (LAeq) and percentile sound pressure level (Lx). They comply with International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1). Table 2.6 summarizes the noise monitoring equipment model being used.
Table 2.6: Noise Monitoring Equipment
Equipment Model |
|
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
Calibrator |
AWA5661 (Serial No.: 301135) |
Quest QC-10 (Serial
No.: Q19010183) |
Field
Monitoring
– The microphone of the Sound Level Meter was set at least 1.2 m above the ground.
– Free Field measurement was made at NM5A monitoring location.
– The battery condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.
– Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:
- frequency weighting: A
- time weighting: Fast
- time measurement: 30 minutes intervals (between 0700-1900 on normal weekdays)
– Prior to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for 94 dB at 1 kHz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement was more than 1 dB, the measurement would be considered invalid and has to be repeated after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.
– During the monitoring period, the Leq, L10 and L90 were recorded. In addition, any site observations and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.
– A correction of +3dB(A) was made to the free field measurements.
Maintenance
and Calibration
– The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator is cleaned with soft cloth at quarterly intervals.
– The sound level meter and calibrator are sent to the supplier or HOKLAS laboratory to check and calibrate at yearly intervals.
– Calibration records are shown in Appendix F.
Weather
Condition
– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.
Table 2.7 details the monitoring program (as proposed in the WKCD EIA report) for landscape and visual impact during the construction phase.
Table 2.7: Monitoring Program for Landscape and Visual Impact during Construction Phase
Stage |
Monitoring Task |
Frequency |
Report |
Approval |
Construction |
Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation measures during the construction
stage. |
Bi-weekly |
ET to report on Contractor’s compliance |
Counter-signed by IEC |
During the landscape and visual impact monitoring, any changes in relation to the landscape and visual amenity should be monitored with reference to the baseline conditions of the site. In addition, mitigation measures were proposed in the WKCD EIA report to minimise the landscape and visual impacts during the construction phase. The proposed mitigation measures as shown in Table 9.1 and Table 9.2 of the EM&A Manual should be checked for proper implementation.
Air quality, noise and
landscape and visual impact monitoring
was undertaken in compliance with the
EM&A Manual during the reporting month.
Results of 1-hour TSP are summarised in Table 3.1. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.
Table 3.1: Summary
of 1-hour TSP monitoring results
Monitoring Station |
Monitoring Date |
Start Time |
1-hour TSP (μg/m3) |
Range (μg/m3) |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level (μg/m3) |
||
1st Result |
2nd Result |
3rd Result |
||||||
AM3A |
04-Oct-24 |
14:09 |
50 |
46 |
45 |
41-60 |
280.4 |
500 |
10-Oct-24 |
08:01 |
43 |
44 |
45 |
||||
16-Oct-24 |
14:07 |
41 |
47 |
47 |
||||
22-Oct-24 |
08:08 |
48 |
50 |
52 |
||||
28-Oct-24 |
14:04 |
60 |
53 |
60 |
||||
AM4A |
04-Oct-24 |
14:17 |
41 |
41 |
42 |
41-59 |
278.5 |
500 |
10-Oct-24 |
08:09 |
46 |
49 |
41 |
||||
16-Oct-24 |
14:15 |
47 |
49 |
46 |
||||
22-Oct-24 |
08:16 |
47 |
52 |
46 |
||||
28-Oct-24 |
14:12 |
59 |
58 |
58 |
||||
AM5A |
04-Oct-24 |
14:32 |
42 |
41 |
44 |
41-55 |
275.4 |
500 |
10-Oct-24 |
08:26 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
||||
16-Oct-24 |
14:30 |
42 |
41 |
41 |
||||
22-Oct-24 |
08:33 |
50 |
52 |
48 |
||||
28-Oct-24 |
14:27 |
54 |
55 |
55 |
Results of 24-hour TSP are summarised in Table 3.2. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.
Table 3.2: Summary
of 24-hour TSP monitoring results
Monitoring Station |
Monitoring Date |
Start Time |
Monitoring Results (μg/m3) |
Range (μg/m3) |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level (μg/m3) |
AM3A |
04-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
40 |
40-53 |
152.4 |
260 |
10-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
41 |
||||
16-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
41 |
||||
22-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
45 |
||||
28-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
53 |
||||
AM4A |
04-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
40 |
40-52 |
152.6 |
260 |
10-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
43 |
||||
16-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
45 |
||||
22-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
46 |
||||
28-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
52 |
||||
AM5A |
04-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
40 |
40-52 |
141.1 |
260 |
10-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
50 |
||||
16-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
41 |
||||
22-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
49 |
||||
28-Oct-24 |
10:00 |
52 |
No exceedance of 1-hour and 24-hour TSP (Action or Limit Level) was recorded in the reporting period.
The construction noise monitoring results are summarized in Table 3.3. Graphical plots of the monitoring data and the station set-up as façade and free-field measurements are shown in Appendix G.
Table 3.3: Summary
of noise monitoring results during normal weekdays
Monitoring Stations |
Monitoring Date |
Start Time |
End Time |
Leq (30 mins) dB(A) |
Limit Level for Leq
(dB(A)) |
NM2A |
04-Oct-24 |
14:09 |
14:39 |
62.7 |
75 |
10-Oct-24 |
08:01 |
08:31 |
62.8 |
||
16-Oct-24 |
14:07 |
14:37 |
62.4 |
||
22-Oct-24 |
08:08 |
08:38 |
62.5 |
||
28-Oct-24 |
14:04 |
14:34 |
62.8 |
||
NM3A |
04-Oct-24 |
15:39 |
16:09 |
60.9 |
75 |
10-Oct-24 |
09:34 |
10:04 |
60.9 |
||
16-Oct-24 |
15:37 |
16:07 |
60.9 |
||
22-Oct-24 |
09:50 |
10:20 |
61.1 |
||
28-Oct-24 |
15:43 |
16:13 |
60.6 |
||
04-Oct-24 |
16:14 |
16:44 |
58.4 |
70/65^# |
|
10-Oct-24 |
10:09 |
10:39 |
58.1 |
||
16-Oct-24 |
16:12 |
16:42 |
58.5 |
||
22-Oct-24 |
10:25 |
10:55 |
58.4 |
||
28-Oct-24 |
16:18 |
16:48 |
58.3 |
||
NM5A* |
04-Oct-24 |
14:59 |
15:29 |
63.4 |
75 |
10-Oct-24 |
08:53 |
09:23 |
63.5 |
||
16-Oct-24 |
14:57 |
15:27 |
63.4 |
||
22-Oct-24 |
09:00 |
09:39 |
63.6 |
||
28-Oct-24 |
14:54 |
15:33 |
63.6 |
Remarks: * +3dB (A) correction was applied to free-field measurement. ^ 70 dB(A) for
schools and 65 dB(A) during school examination periods. # No school examination was conducted during
reporting period. |
No exceedance of Construction Noise (Action
or Limit Level) was recorded in the reporting month
Construction Noise
Permits for the works carried out during restricted hours were obtained and
listed in Table 4.3.
Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the weekly site inspections on 02, 16 and 30 October 2024 for Zones 2A, 2B & 2C during the reporting month. As reviewed by the registered Landscape Architect, no adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.
The landscape and visual mitigation measures were implemented during the reporting period. The summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures is provided in Appendix J.
Construction phase weekly site inspections
were carried out on 02, 09, 16, 23 and 30 October 2024 at Zones 2A, 2B &
2C. The joint site inspection with IEC, ET, ER and Contractor for Zones 2A, 2B
& 2C was held on 09 October 2024. All observations have been recorded in
the site inspection checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the
appropriate recommended mitigation measures where necessary.
The key observations
from the site inspections and associated recommendations are summarized in Table 4..
Table 4.1: Summary
of Site Inspections and Recommendations for Zones 2A, 2B & 2C
Inspection
Date |
Parameter |
Observation
/ Recommendation |
Contactor’s
Responses / Action(s) Undertaken |
Close-out
(Date) |
02-Oct-24 |
Waste Management |
The contractor
was reminded to have better housekeeping. |
Waste water hose was removed. |
02-Oct-24 |
16-Oct-24 |
Air Quality & Waste Management |
The contractor
was reminded that dust suppression measures shall be strengthened at the
access road to minimize dust impact. The contractor
was reminded to have better housekeeping and dispose general refuse
frequently at designated area and to avoid accumulation on site which may
lead to hygiene problem. |
Water sprinklers were set up. General refuse was disposed. |
21-Oct-24 |
30-Oct-24 |
Waste Management |
The contractor
was reminded to have better housekeeping and dispose general refuse
frequently at designated area and to avoid accumulation on site which may
lead to hygiene problem. |
General refuse was disposed. |
01-Nov-24 |
The Contractors have been registered as a
chemical waste producer for the Project. Construction and demolition (C&D)
material sorting will be carried out on site. A sufficient number of receptacles
were available for general refuse collection.
As advised by the
Zones 2A, 2B & 2C Contractor, 231.10 tonne and 0.0 tonne of inert C&D
material were disposed of as public fill to Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Public Fill
and Tuen Mun Area 38 Public Fill respectively, while 2.06 tonne of general
refuse were disposed of at SENT landfill. 0.0 tonne of metals, 0.0 tonne of
paper/cardboard packaging, 0.0 tonne of plastics and 0.0 tonne of timber was
collected by recycling contractors in the reporting month. 0.0 tonne of inert
C&D material were reused on site. 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material were
reused in other projects and 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was imported
for reuse at site in the reporting month. 10.18 tonne of inert C&D material
was disposed to sorting facility and 0.0
tonne of chemical waste was collected by licensed contractors in the reporting
period.
The cumulative waste generation records for Zones
2A, 2B & 2C are shown in Appendix
I.
The environmental permits, licenses, and/or
notifications on environmental protection for this Project which were valid
during the period are
summarised in Table 4.3.
The environmental permits, licenses, and/or
notifications on environmental protection for this Project which were valid
during the period are
summarised in Table 4..
Table 4.3: Status
of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for Zones 2A, 2B & 2C
Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No. |
Valid
Period |
Status |
Remarks |
|
From |
To |
|||
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
||||
WPN5117-256-V1011-40 |
11-Jul-24 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
Billing
Account Construction Waste Disposal |
||||
7051739 |
01-Aug-24 |
-- |
Account Active |
-- |
Construction
Noise Permit |
||||
GW-RE1296-24 |
23-Oct-24 |
13-Apr-2025 |
Valid |
- |
Wastewater
Discharge License |
||||
WT00045374-2024 |
24-Oct-24 |
31-Oct-2029 |
Valid |
-- |
Notification
under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
||||
10006790 |
11-Jul-24 |
-- |
Notified |
-- |
The EM&A programme followed the
recommended mitigation measures in the EM&A Manual. The EM&A
requirements as well as the summary of implementation status of the
environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix
J. In particular, the
following mitigation measures were brought to attention during the site
inspections:
–
Dust suppression measures shall be strengthened at
the access road to minimize dust impact.
Waste Management
– Better
housekeeping and frequent disposal of general refuse at the designated areas shall
be strengthened to avoid the accumulation of waste on site.
The status
of the required submission under the EP during the reporting period is
summarized in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1: Status of Submissions under the Environmental Permit
EP Condition |
Submission |
Submission Date |
Condition 3.4 |
Monthly
EM&A Report for September 2024 |
10 October 2024 |
There was no breach of Action or Limit levels for Air Quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and Construction Noise in this reporting month.
No environmental complaint was received in the
reporting month.
The cumulative statistics on complaints were
provided in Appendix K.
No notifications of summons or successful prosecutions were received this month. The cumulative statistics on notifications of summons and successful prosecutions were provided in Appendix K.
The major site works for
Zones 2A, 2B & 2C scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:
·
Ground
Investigation Works and Pipe Piling Works
Key issues to be considered in the coming
month include:
●
Generation
of dust from construction works;
●
Noise
impact from piling works;
●
Generation
of site surface runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;
●
Management
of stockpiles and slopes, particularly on rainy days;
●
Sorting,
recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste; and
●
Management
of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site.
The environmental site inspection and environmental monitoring will be continued in the coming month. The tentative monitoring schedule for the coming month is shown in the Appendix E.
The EM&A programme as recommended in the EM&A Manual has been undertaken. The construction works and EM&A programme for Zone 2A (Contract No.: GW/2020/05/073) was commenced on 03 October 2020 and handed over on 31 March 2023; while the construction works and EM&A programme for Zone 2B & 2C (Contract No.: CC/2020/2B/088) was commenced on 30 September 2021 and handed over on 05 July 2024. The construction works and EM&A programme for Zones 2A, 2B & 2C (Contract No.: CC/2023/2B/095) was commenced on 05 July 2024.
Monitoring
of air quality and noise with respect to the Projects is underway. In particular, the 1-hour TSP, 24-hour TSP, Noise Level
(as Leq, 30 minutes) under monitoring have been
checked against established Action and Limit levels. There was no breach
of Action or Limit levels for Air Quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and
Construction Noise in this reporting month.
No environmental complaints were recorded in the
reporting month. No notifications of summons or successful prosecutions were
received during the reporting month.
Weekly
construction phase site inspections and bi-weekly landscape and visual impact
inspections were conducted during the reporting month as required. It was
observed that the Contractors had implemented all possible and feasible
mitigation measures to mitigate the potential environmental impacts during
construction phase works.
Potential environmental impacts due to the
construction activities, including air quality, noise, water quality, waste, landscape and visual, will be
monitored or reviewed. The recommended environmental mitigation measures shall be implemented on site and regular
inspections as required will be carried out to ensure that the environmental conditions are acceptable.