Contents
1.3 Construction
Works Status in the Reporting Period
1.4 Summary
of EM&A Requirements and Alternative Monitoring Locations
1.4.2 Alternative
Monitoring Locations
2 Impact
Monitoring Methodology
2.2.1 Monitoring
Parameters, Frequency and Duration
2.3.1 Monitoring
Parameters, Frequency and Duration
3.4 Landscape
and Visual Impact
4 Site
Environmental Management
4.2 Advice on the Solid and Liquid Waste
Management Status
4.3 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits
4.4 Recommended
Mitigation Measures
5 Compliance
with Environmental Permit
6 Report
in Non-compliance, Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful
Prosecutions
6.1 Record
on Non-compliance of Action and Limit Levels
6.2 Record
on Environmental Complaints Received
6.3 Record
on Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecution
7.1 Construction Works for the Coming
Month(s)
7.2 Key
Issues for the Coming Month
7.3 Monitoring
Schedule for the Coming Month
8 Conclusions
and Recommendations
Figure 1 Site
Layout Plan and Monitoring Stations
B. Tentative
Construction Programme
C. Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Phase
D. Event
and Action Plan for Air Quality, Noise, Landscape and Visual Impact
G. Graphical
Plots of the Monitoring Results
H. Meteorological
Data Extracted from Hong Kong Observatory
J. Environmental
Mitigation Measures – Implementation Status
K. Cumulative
Statistics on Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
Apex Testing & Certification Limited (Apex) was commissioned to
undertake the Environmental Team (ET) services (including environmental
monitoring and audit (EM&A)) for the construction activities in Zone 2A,
consisting of Foundation, Excavation and Lateral Support Works for Integrated
Basement and Underground Road (Contract No.: GW/2020/05/073); and Zone 2B
& 2C consisting of Piling Works for Integrated Basement and Underground
Road (Contract No.: CC/2020/2B/088) at WKCD. The major construction works and
EM&A programme for Zone 2A and Zone 2B & 2C commenced on 3 October 2020
and 30 September 2021 respectively.
The Project Proponent is the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority (WKCDA). The overall works for the WKCD fall under two separate categories of Designated Project (DP) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), namely an “engineering feasibility study of urban development projects with a study area covering more than 20 ha or involving a total population of more than 100 000” (Item 1 of Schedule 3) and “an underpass more than 100m in length under the built areas” (Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2). An Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/B (EP) was issued with respect to the “Underpass Road and Austin Road Flyover Serving the West Kowloon Cultural District” which specifically includes the abovementioned category of DP under Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO.
This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works at Zone 2A and Zone 2B & 2C from 1 to 31 January 2022.
Exceedance of Action and Limit Levels
There was no breach of Action or Limit levels for Air Quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and Construction Noise in this reporting month.
Implementation of
Mitigation Measures
Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 06, 13, 20 and 27January 2022 for Foundation, Excavation and Lateral Support Works in Zone 2A and on 04, 11, 18 and 25 January 2022 for Piling Works in Zone 2B & 2C to confirm the implementation measures undertaken by the Contractors in the reporting month. The outcomes are presented in Section 4 and the status of implementation of mitigation measures in the site is shown in Appendix J.
Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the abovementioned weekly site inspections during the reporting month. No adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.
Record of Complaints
No environmental complaint was recorded in the reporting month.
Record of Notifications
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
No notifications of summons and successful prosecutions were recorded in the reporting month.
Future Key Issues
The major site works for Zone 2A scheduled to be commissioned in the
coming month include:
Zone 2A-1
● ELS (Stage 1) – Grouting / Pipe Pile Works
– King Post & Erection of Steel Column for Working Platform
Zone 2A-2
● ELS (Stage 1) – Grouting / Pipe Pile Works
– King Post
– Stage 1a & 1b Grouting
– Pipe Pile Construction
The major
site works for Zone 2B & 2C scheduled to be commissioned in the coming
month include:
KD01 (Stage 1-1), KD05 (Section 1), KD06 (Section 2), KD09 (Section 5)
● Bored Pile Works
– Predrilling, RCD Drilling, Airlifting, Cage Installation & Concreting and Excavation
KD02 (Stage 5-1), KD08 (Section 4)
● Bored Pile Works
– RCD Drilling, Airlifting, Cage Installation & Concreting and Excavation
KD03 (Stage 3-1), KD07 (Section 3)
● Bored Pile Works
– RCD Drilling and Excavation
Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities, including air, noise, water quality, waste, landscape and visual, will be monitored or reviewed. The recommended environmental mitigation measures shall be implemented on site and regular inspections as required will be carried out to ensure that the environmental conditions are acceptable.
Apex Testing & Certification Limited (Apex) was commissioned to
undertake the Environmental Team (ET) services (including environmental
monitoring and audit (EM&A)) for the construction activities in Zone 2A,
consisting of Foundation, Excavation and Lateral Support Works for Integrated
Basement and Underground Road (Contract No.: GW/2020/05/073) ; and Zone 2B
& 2C consisting of Piling Works for Integrated Basement and Underground
Road (Contract No.: CC/2020/2B/088) at WKCD. The purpose of the development in
Zone 2A and Zone 2B & 2C is to reserve for Integrated Basement (IB) and
Underground Road (UR). The Zone 2A construction activities involve the
foundation, excavation and lateral support (ELS) works, road works, drainage
diversion works, and temporary car parking. The Zone 2B & 2C construction
activities involve the piling works. The major construction works and EM&A
programme for Zone 2A and Zone 2B & 2C commenced on 3 October 2020 and 30
September 2021 respectively.
The overall works for the WKCD fall under two separate categories of
Designated Project (DP) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance
(EIAO), namely an “engineering feasibility study of urban development projects
with a study area covering more than 20 ha or involving a total population of
more than 100 000” (Item 1 of Schedule 3) and “an underpass more than 100m in
length under the built areas” (Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2). An Environmental
Permit No. EP-453/2013/B (EP) was issued with respect to the “Underpass Road
and Austin Road Flyover Serving the West Kowloon Cultural District” which
specifically includes the abovementioned category of DP under Item A.9, Part I,
Schedule 2 of the EIAO. The captioned projects include part of the
abovementioned underpass road located within the site boundary falls under this
same category.
The Monthly EM&A Report is prepared in accordance with the Condition 3.4 of the Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/B. This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works at Zone 2A and Zone 2B & 2C from 1 to 31 January 2022. The purpose of this report is to summarise the findings in the EM&A of the project over the reporting period.
The
organisation chart and lines of communication with respect to the on-site
environmental management structure together with the contact information of the
key personnel are shown in Appendix A.
During the reporting period, construction works at Zone 2A undertaken include:
Zone 2A-1
● ELS (Stage 1) – Grouting / Pipe Pile Works
– King Post & Erection of Steel Column for Working Platform
● Socketed H-Pile Works
– Remaining Socketed H-Pile Works
Zone 2A-2
● ELS (Stage 1) – Grouting / Pipe Pile Works
– King Post
– Stage 1a & 1b Grouting
– Pipe Pile Construction
KD01 (Stage
1-1)
● Bored Pile Works
– Predrilling, Airlifting, Cage Installation & Concreting and Excavation
KD02 (Stage 5-1), KD05 (Section 1), KD06 (Section 2), KD08 (Section 4)
● Bored Pile Works
– Predrilling, RCD Drilling, Airlifting, Cage Installation & Concreting and Excavation
KD03 (Stage 3-1), KD07 (Section 3), KD09 (Section 5)
● Bored Pile Works
– Predrilling and Excavation
KD04 (Stage 4-1)
● Bored Pile Works
– Predrilling
The Construction Works Programme of Zone 2A and Zone 2B & 2C is provided in Appendix B. A
layout plan of the Project is provided in Figure 1. Please refer to Table 4.3 and Table 4.4 on the status of the environmental
licenses.
The EM&A programme requires environmental monitoring of air quality, noise, landscape and visual as specified in the approved EM&A Manual.
A summary of impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1: Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
Parameters |
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Air Quality |
24-Hours TSP |
AM3-The Victoria Towers Tower 1 |
At least once every 6 days |
1-Hour TSP |
AM3-The Victoria Towers Tower 1 |
At least 3 times every 6 days |
|
24-Hours TSP |
AM4-Canton Road Government Primary School |
At least once every 6 days |
|
1-Hour TSP |
AM4-Canton Road Government Primary School |
At least 3 times every 6 days |
|
24-Hours TSP |
AM5-Topside Developments at West Kowloon Terminus Site |
At least once every 6 days |
|
1-Hour TSP |
AM5-Topside Developments at West Kowloon Terminus Site |
At least 3 times every 6 days |
|
Noise |
Leq, 30 minutes |
NM2-The Arch, Sun Tower |
Weekly |
Leq, 30 minutes |
NM3-The Victoria Towers Tower 1 |
Weekly |
|
Leq, 30 minutes |
NM4-Canton Road Government Primary School |
Weekly |
|
Leq, 30 minutes |
NM5-Development next to Austin Station |
Weekly |
|
Landscape & Visual |
Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation measures during the
construction stage |
As described in Table 9.1 and 9.2 of the EM&A Manual |
Bi-Weekly |
The EM&A programme for the Project should require 5 noise monitoring
station and 5 air quality monitoring stations located closest to the Project
area. With
regard to the
monitoring activities at M+ Museum and the Lyric Complex, three monitoring stations
had been considered, including AM1 (International Commerce Centre), AM2 (The
Harbourside Tower 1) for air monitoring, and NM1 (The Harbourside Tower 1) for
noise monitoring.
In the context of the construction
activities in Zone 2A and Zone 2B & 2C, all other monitoring locations
including AM3 (The Victoria Towers
Tower 1), AM4 (Canton Road Government Primary School), and AM5 (Topside
Developments at West Kowloon Terminus Site) for air monitoring; and NM2 (The Arch, Sun Tower), NM3 (The Victoria Towers Tower 1), NM4 (Canton
Road Government Primary School) and NM5 (Development next to Austin Station) for noise
monitoring, have
been taken into account. However, access to all these originally designated
monitoring stations was declined as described below point-by-point.
The Arch management office and owners’
committee have formally declined the proposal of setting up noise monitoring
instrument on its premises at the podium level of Sun Tower (NM2) on 24 July
2014. Thus, alternative
noise monitoring location was identified at the ground floor in front of The Arch – Sun Tower (NM2A),
which is at the same location as stated in the EM&A Manual for consistency. No management
approval is required at the ground floor for conducting the noise monitoring. This alternative air monitoring location was approved by EPD on 29
September 2020.
The Victoria Towers management
office formally declined the proposal of setting up air
quality and noise monitoring instruments on its premises at the podium area
of Tower 1 (AM3/NM3) on 16 June 2020. Alternative air monitoring location was
identified at ground floor at the Northeast corner of West Kowloon Station’s
station box (AM3A), in the same direction to the area of major construction
site activities in Zone 2A. This alternative air monitoring location was
approved by EPD on 29 September 2020. An alternative noise monitoring location
was identified at the ground floor in front of the Xiqu
Centre (NM3A), which is set closer to the construction site boundary with more
direct line sight to the major site activities and higher exposure to the
construction noise with no disturbance to the premises’ occupants during noise
monitoring activities. No management approval is required at the ground floor
for conducting the noise monitoring. This alternative air monitoring location
was approved by EPD on 29 September 2020.
Canton Road Government Primary
School formally declined the proposal of setting up air
quality and noise monitoring instruments on its premise at the podium level (AM4/NM4) on 16 June 2020. Alternative air monitoring
location was identified at ground floor at the Southeast corner of West Kowloon Station’s station box
(AM4A), in same direction to the area of major construction site activities in
Zone 2A. This alternative air monitoring location was approved by EPD on 29
September 2020. An alternative noise monitoring
location was identified at the ground floor next to Tsim Sha Tsui Fire
Station (NM4A), which is set closer to the construction site boundary with
more direct line sight to the major site activities and higher exposure to the
construction noise with no disturbance to the premises’ occupants during noise monitoring
activities. No management approval is required at the ground floor for
conducting the noise monitoring. This alternative air monitoring location was
approved by EPD on 29 September 2020.
MTR also formally declined the
access to the designated AM5 location (topside developments at West Kowloon
Terminus Site) on 15 July 2020. Alternative air monitoring location was
identified at ground floor at the North
of West Kowloon Station’s station box (AM5A), in same direction
to the area of major construction site activities in Zone 2A. This alternative
air monitoring location was approved by EPD on 29 September 2020.
Grand Austin property management
office formally declined our proposal of setting up noise monitoring instrument on its premises at the podium
level (NM5) on 10 July 2020. Alternative noise monitoring location was
identified at the Pedestrian road (ground floor) outside West Kowloon Station
(NM5A), which is set closer to the
construction site boundary with more direct line sight to the major site
activities and higher exposure to the construction noise with no disturbance to
the premises’ occupants during noise monitoring activities. No management
approval is required at the ground floor for conducting the noise monitoring.
This alternative air monitoring location was approved by EPD on 29 September
2020.
The Environmental Quality Performance Limits for air quality and noise are shown in Appendix C.
The Event and Action Plan for air quality, construction noise, and landscape and visual are shown in Appendix D.
The EM&A programme followed
the recommended mitigation measures in the EM&A Manual. The EM&A
requirements as well as the summary of implementation status of the
environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix J.
Air quality and noise monitoring
methodology, including the monitoring locations, equipment used, parameters, frequency
and duration etc., are described in this Section. The environmental monitoring
schedules for the reporting period and the tentative monitoring Schedule for
the coming month are provided in Appendix E.
The relevant EM&A monitoring
requirements and details for landscape and audit impact, are also presented in
this Section.
Table 2.1 summarizes the monitoring
parameters, frequency and duration of the TSP monitoring.
Table
2.1: Air
Quality Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Parameter |
Frequency |
Duration |
24-hour TSP |
At least once in every six-days |
24 hours |
1-hour TSP |
At least 3 times every six-days |
60 minutes |
Monitoring
stations and locations are given in Table
2.2
and shown in Figure 1.
Table 2.2: Air Quality Monitoring Station
Monitoring Station |
Location Description |
AM3A |
Northeast corner of West Kowloon Station’s station box
(G/F) |
AM4A |
Southeast corner of West Kowloon Station’s station box
(G/F) |
AM5A |
North of West Kowloon Station’s station box (G/F) |
Continuous 24-hour TSP air quality monitoring was conducted using High Volume Sampler (HVS) (Model: TE-5170) located at the designated monitoring station. The HVS meets all the requirements stated in of the EM&A Manual. Portable direct reading dust meter was used to carry out the 1-hour TSP monitoring. Table 2.3 summarizes the equipment used in the impact air quality monitoring. Copies of the calibration certificates for the HVS, calibration kit and portable dust meters are attached in Appendix F.
Table 2.3: TSP
Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
24-hour TSP monitoring |
|
High Volume Sampler |
TE-5170 (Serial No.: 4340; 3998; 4344) |
Calibrator |
TE-5025A (Orifice I.D.: 3543) |
1-hour TSP monitoring |
|
Portable direct reading dust meter |
Sibata LD-3B (Serial No.: 235811,
336338, 567188) |
Calibration of the HVS (five-point
calibration) using Calibration Kit was carried out every two months. The HVS
calibration orifice will be calibrated annually. Calibration certificate of the
TE-5025A Calibration Kit and the HVS are provided in Appendix F.
The 1-hour TSP monitoring should be determined periodically (e.g. annually) by the HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method.
24-hour TSP Monitoring
Installation
The HVS was installed at the site boundary. The following criteria were considered in the installation of the HVS.
– A horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the sampler against gusty wind was provided.
– The distance between the HVS and any obstacles, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the HVS.
– A minimum of 2 metres separation from walls, parapets and penthouse was required for rooftop sampler.
– A minimum of 2 metres separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally was required.
– No furnace or incinerator flues or building vent were nearby.
– Airflow around the sampler was unrestricted.
– The sampler has been more than 20 metres from any drip line.
– Permission was obtained to set up the sampler and to obtain access to the monitoring station.
– A secured supply of electricity is needed to operate the sampler.
Preparation of Filter
Papers
– Glass fibre filters were labelled and sufficient filters that were clean and without pinholes were selected.
– The filters used are specified to have a minimum collection efficiency of 99 percent for 0.3 µm (DOP) particles.
– All filters were equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing. The conditioning environment temperature was around 25 °C and not variable by more than ±3 °C with relative humidity (RH) < 50% and was not variable by more than ±5 %. A convenient working RH was 40%. All preparation of filters was done by Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory.
Field Monitoring
Procedures
– The power supply was checked to ensure the HVS works properly.
– The filter holder and the area surrounding the filter were cleaned.
– The filter holder was removed by loosening the four bolts and a new filter, with stamped number upward, on a supporting screen was aligned carefully.
– The filter was properly aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter.
– The swing bolts were fastened to hold the filter holder down to the frame. The pressure applied should be sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.
– The shelter lid was closed and was secured with the aluminium strip.
– The HVS was warmed-up for about 5 minutes to establish run-temperature conditions.
– A new flow rate record sheet was set into the flow recorder.
– The flow rate of the HVS was checked and adjusted at around 1.3 m3/min. The range specified in the EM&A Manual was between 0.6-1.7 m3/min.
– The programmable timer was set for a sampling period of 24 hours, and the starting time, weather condition and the filter number were recorded.
– The initial elapsed time was recorded.
– At the end of sampling, the sampled filter was removed carefully and folded in half length so that only surfaces with collected particulate matter were in contact.
– It was then placed in a clean plastic envelope and sealed.
– All monitoring information was recorded on a standard data sheet.
– Filters were sent to a Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory for analysis.
Maintenance and Calibration
– The HVS and its accessories are maintained in good working condition, such as replacing motor brushes routinely and checking electrical wiring to ensure a continuous power supply.
– HVSs were calibrated upon installation and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals. The calibration kits were calibrated annually.
– Calibration records for HVS and calibration kit are shown in Appendix F.
1-hour TSP Monitoring
Field Monitoring
The measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with
the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:
– Turn the power on.
– Close the air collecting opening cover.
– Push the “TIME SETTING” switch to [BG].
– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform background measurement for 6 seconds.
– Turn the knob at SENSI ADJ position to insert the light scattering plate.
– Leave the equipment for 1 minute upon “SPAN CHECK” is indicated in the display.
– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform automatic sensitivity adjustment. This measurement takes 1 minute.
– Pull out the knob and return it to MEASURE position.
– Setting time period of 1 hour for the 1-hour TSP measurement.
– Push “START/STOP” to start the 1-hour TSP measurement.
– Regular checking of the time period setting to ensure monitoring time of 1 hour.
Maintenance and Calibration
– The 1-hour dust meter would be checked at 3-month intervals and calibrated at 1-year intervals throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.
– Calibration records for direct dust meters are shown in Appendix F.
Weather Condition
– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.
Table 2.4 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of
noise monitoring. The noise in A-weighted levels Leq,
L10 and L90 are recorded in a 30-minute interval between
0700 and 1900 hours.
Table 2.4: Noise Monitoring Parameters, Period and Frequency
Time Period |
Parameters |
Frequency |
Daytime
on normal weekdays (0700-1900
hours) |
Leq(30 min), L90(30 min) & L10(30
min) |
Once
every week |
Note: *70 dB(A) for
schools and 65 dB(A) during school examination periods.
If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions
stipulated in the Construction Noise Permit (CNP) issued by the Noise Control
Authority have to be followed.
Noise monitoring stations and locations are given in Table
2.5 and shown in Figure 1.
Table 2.5: Noise Monitoring Station
Monitoring Station |
Location |
NM2A |
|
NM3A |
|
NM4A |
Next to Tsim Sha Tsui Fire Station (G/F) |
NM5A |
Pedestrian road (G/F) outside West Kowloon
Station |
Integrating Sound Level Meter was used for noise monitoring. It was a Type 1 sound level meter capable of giving a continuous readout of the noise level readings including equivalent continuous sound pressure level (LAeq) and percentile sound pressure level (Lx). They comply with International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1). Table 2.6 summarizes the noise monitoring equipment model being used.
Table 2.6: Noise Monitoring Equipment
Equipment Model |
|
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
Calibrator |
AWA5661 (Serial No.: 301135)
|
Pulsar 100B (Serial No.: 039507) |
Field Monitoring
– The microphone of the Sound Level Meter was set at least 1.2 m above the ground.
– Free Field measurement was made at NM5A monitoring location.
– The battery condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.
– Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:
- frequency weighting: A
- time weighting: Fast
- time measurement: 30 minutes intervals (between 0700-1900 on normal weekdays)
– Prior to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for 94 dB at 1 kHz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement was more than 1 dB, the measurement would be considered invalid and has to be repeated after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.
– During the monitoring period, the Leq, L10 and L90 were recorded. In addition, any site observations and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.
– A correction of +3dB(A) was made to the free field measurements.
Maintenance and Calibration
– The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator is cleaned with soft cloth at quarterly intervals.
– The sound level meter and calibrator are sent to the supplier or HOKLAS laboratory to check and calibrate at yearly intervals.
– Calibration records are shown in Appendix F.
Weather Condition
– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.
Table 2.7 details the monitoring program (as proposed in the WKCD EIA report) for landscape and visual impact during the construction phase.
Table 2.7: Monitoring Program for Landscape and Visual Impact during Construction Phase
Stage |
Monitoring
Task |
Frequency |
Report |
Approval |
Construction |
Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation
measures during the construction stage. |
Bi-weekly |
ET to report on Contractor’s compliance |
Counter-signed by IEC |
During the landscape and visual impact monitoring, any changes in relation to the landscape and visual amenity should be monitored with reference to the baseline conditions of the site. In addition, mitigation measures were proposed in the WKCD EIA report to minimise the landscape and visual impacts during the construction phase. The proposed mitigation measures as shown in Table 9.1 and Table 9.2 of the EM&A Manual should be checked for proper implementation.
Air quality, noise
and landscape and visual impact
monitoring was undertaken in compliance
with the EM&A Manual during the reporting
month.
Results of 1-hour TSP are summarised in Table 3.1. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.
Table 3.1: Summary
of 1-hour TSP monitoring results
Monitoring Station |
Monitoring Date |
Start Time |
1-hour TSP (μg/m3) |
Range (μg/m3) |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level (μg/m3) |
||
1st Result |
2nd Result |
3rd Result |
||||||
AM3A |
05-Jan-22 |
8:09 |
84 |
83 |
86 |
45-86 |
280.4 |
500 |
11-Jan-22 |
14:02 |
47 |
53 |
45 |
||||
17-Jan-22 |
8:01 |
82 |
82 |
76 |
||||
22-Jan-22 |
14:07 |
56 |
51 |
60 |
||||
28-Jan-22 |
8:11 |
55 |
60 |
55 |
||||
31-Jan-22 |
14:10 |
49 |
48 |
45 |
||||
AM4A |
05-Jan-22 |
8:17 |
86 |
83 |
83 |
47-86 |
278.5 |
500 |
11-Jan-22 |
14:10 |
51 |
53 |
51 |
||||
17-Jan-22 |
8:09 |
79 |
80 |
84 |
||||
22-Jan-22 |
14:15 |
56 |
54 |
54 |
||||
28-Jan-22 |
8:19 |
51 |
59 |
57 |
||||
31-Jan-22 |
14:18 |
47 |
50 |
49 |
||||
AM5A |
05-Jan-22 |
8:32 |
91 |
88 |
87 |
47-91 |
275.4 |
500 |
11-Jan-22 |
14:27 |
49 |
54 |
52 |
||||
17-Jan-22 |
8:24 |
85 |
78 |
78 |
||||
22-Jan-22 |
14:32 |
59 |
57 |
54 |
||||
28-Jan-22 |
8:34 |
59 |
53 |
51 |
||||
31-Jan-22 |
14:26 |
47 |
53 |
47 |
Results of 24-hour TSP are summarised in Table 3.2. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.
Table 3.2: Summary
of 24-hour TSP monitoring results
Monitoring Station |
Monitoring Date |
Start Time |
Monitoring Results (μg/m3) |
Range (μg/m3) |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level (μg/m3) |
AM3A |
05-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
78.8 |
41.9-78.8 |
152.4 |
260 |
11-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
41.9 |
||||
17-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
66.3 |
||||
22-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
47.9 |
||||
28-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
55.0 |
||||
31-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
46.6 |
||||
AM4A |
05-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
77.5 |
46.2-77.5 |
152.6 |
260 |
11-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
48.8 |
||||
17-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
69.3 |
||||
22-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
54.0 |
||||
28-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
54.0 |
||||
31-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
46.2 |
||||
AM5A |
05-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
81.3 |
43.5-81.3 |
141.1 |
260 |
11-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
47.0 |
||||
17-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
75.2 |
||||
22-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
52.9 |
||||
28-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
49.0 |
||||
31-Jan-22 |
10:00 |
43.5 |
No exceedance of 1-hour and 24-hour TSP (Action or Limit Level) was recorded in the reporting period.
The construction noise monitoring results are summarized in Table 3.3. Graphical plots of the monitoring data and the station set-up as façade and free-field measurements are shown in Appendix G.
Table 3.3: Summary
of noise monitoring results during normal weekdays
Monitoring Stations |
Monitoring
Date |
Start Time |
End Time |
Leq
(30 mins) dB(A) |
Limit Level
for Leq (dB(A)) |
NM2A |
05-Jan-22 |
08:39 |
09:09 |
58.1 |
75 |
11-Jan-22 |
14:32 |
15:02 |
58.7 |
||
17-Jan-22 |
08:31 |
09:01 |
58.6 |
||
22-Jan-22 |
14:37 |
15:07 |
58.2 |
||
28-Jan-22 |
08:41 |
09:11 |
58.1 |
||
31-Jan-22 |
14:10 |
14:40 |
58.0 |
||
NM3A |
05-Jan-22 |
10:09 |
10:39 |
69.7 |
75 |
11-Jan-22 |
16:05 |
16:35 |
70.1 |
||
17-Jan-22 |
10:01 |
10:31 |
70.0 |
||
22-Jan-22 |
16:10 |
16:40 |
69.6 |
||
28-Jan-22 |
10:11 |
10:41 |
70.5 |
||
31-Jan-22 |
15:52 |
16:22 |
66.2 |
||
NM4A |
05-Jan-22 |
10:44 |
11:14 |
68.3 |
70/65^# |
11-Jan-22 |
16:40 |
17:10 |
68.3 |
||
17-Jan-22 |
10:36 |
11:06 |
63.9 |
||
22-Jan-22 |
16:45 |
17:15 |
68.2 |
||
28-Jan-22 |
10:46 |
11:16 |
64.1 |
||
31-Jan-22 |
16:27 |
16:57 |
63.2 |
||
NM5A* |
05-Jan-22 |
09:29 |
09:59 |
65.5 |
75 |
11-Jan-22 |
15:24 |
15:54 |
65.6 |
||
17-Jan-22 |
09:21 |
09:51 |
65.4 |
||
22-Jan-22 |
15:29 |
15:59 |
65.1 |
||
28-Jan-22 |
09:31 |
10:01 |
65.5 |
||
31-Jan-22 |
15:11 |
15:41 |
65.2 |
Remarks: * +3dB (A) correction was applied to free-field measurement. ^
70 dB(A) for schools and 65 dB(A) during school examination
periods. # School
examination was conducted on 13 to 14, 17 to 21 and 24 to 28 January in the
reporting period. |
No exceedance (Action or Limit Level) of construction noise was recorded in the reporting month.
School examination was
conducted on 13 to 14, 17 to 21 and 24 to 28 January during the reporting
period. Additional monitoring was carried out at NM4A on the examination date on
13 to 14, 18 to 21 and 24 to 27 January 2022.and the Leq
(30 mins) is in the range of 63.8 to 64.3 dB(A).
Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the weekly site inspections on 06 and 20 January 2022 for Zone 2A and 11 and 25 January 2022 for Zone 2B & 2C during the reporting month. As reviewed by the registered Landscape Architect, no adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.
The landscape and visual mitigation measures were implemented during the reporting period. The summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures is provided in Appendix J.
Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 06, 13,
20 and 27 January 2022 at Zone 2A. The joint site
inspection with IEC, ET, ER and Contractor for Zone 2A was held on 20
January 2022. All observations have been recorded in the site inspection
checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate
recommended mitigation measures where necessary.
The key observations from the
site inspections and associated recommendations are summarized in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1: Summary
of Site Inspections and Recommendations for Zone 2A
Inspection Date |
Parameter |
Observation / Recommendation |
Contactor’s Responses /
Action(s) Undertaken |
Close-out (Date) |
06-Jan-22 |
Water Quality |
The contractor was reminded to provide water
pump to pump the pilling wastewater to the nearby sedimentation facilities. |
The contractor has provided water pump to
pump the pilling wastewater to the nearby sedimentation facilities. |
07-Jan-22 |
20-Jan-22 |
Water Quality |
The contractor was reminded to provide
regularly cleaning at drainage system near Gate 2. |
The contractor has provided cleaning at the
drainage system near Gate 2. |
22-Jan-22 |
27-Jan-22 |
Water Quality |
The contractor was reminded to pump out the
accumulated water at u-channel regularly. |
The contractor has pumped out the accumulated water at u-channel. |
28-Jan-22 |
Construction phase weekly site
inspections were carried out on 04, 11, 18 and 25 January 2022 at Zone 2B &
2C. The joint site inspection with IEC, ET, ER and Contractor for Zone 2B &
2C was held on 11 January 2022. All observations have been recorded in the site
inspection checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate
recommended mitigation measures where necessary.
The key observations from the site inspections and associated
recommendations are summarized in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2: Summary
of Site Inspections and Recommendations for Zone 2B & 2C
Inspection Date |
Parameter |
Observation / Recommendation |
Contactor’s Responses / Action(s) Undertaken |
Close-out (Date) |
04-Jan-22 |
Air quality |
The
contractor was reminded that the idle stockpile shall be fully covered/
removed from site. |
The
contractor has fully covered the idle stockpile. |
04-Jan-22 |
11-Jan-22 |
Waste Management |
The
contractor was reminded to properly place the chemicals with drip
trays/remove to storage area to prevent chemical spillage. |
The
contractor has removed the chemicals to chemical storage to prevent chemical
spillage. |
11-Jan-22 |
18-Jan-22 |
Noise Impact |
The
contractor was reminded to properly set up the noise barriers to minimize
noise impact. |
The contractor has properly
set up the noise barriers to minimize noise impact. |
18-Jan-22 |
25-Jan-22 |
Waste Management |
The
contractor was reminded to properly place the chemicals with drip
trays/remove to storage area to prevent chemical spillage. The contractor was also recommended to set up
appropriate C&D material sorting on site for reuse, recycling or transfer
to other project in order to minimize the disposal at public fill. |
The
contractor has removed the chemicals to chemical storage to prevent chemical
spillage. |
25-Jan-22 |
25-Jan-22 |
Noise Impact |
The
contractor was reminded to properly set up the noise barriers to minimize
noise impact. |
The contractor has properly
set up the noise barriers to minimize noise impact. |
25-Jan-22 |
25-Jan-22 |
Air Quality |
The
contractor was reminded that the idle stockpile shall be fully covered/
removed from site. |
The
contractor has fully covered the idle stockpile. |
25-Jan-22 |
The Contractors have been
registered as a chemical waste producer for the Project. Construction and
demolition (C&D) material sorting will be carried out on site. A sufficient number of receptacles were available for
general refuse collection.
As advised by the Zone 2A Contractor, 85.07 tonnes and 1663.14 tonnes of inert C&D material were disposed of as
public fill to Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Public Fill and
Tuen Mun Area 38 Public Fill respectively, while 16.33
tonnes of general refuse were disposed of at SENT landfill respectively. 0.0
tonne of metals, 0.0 tonne of paper/cardboard packaging, 0.0 tonne of plastics
and 0.0 tonne of timber was collected by recycling contractors in the reporting
month. 120.00 tonnes of inert C&D material was
reused on site. 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material were reused in other
projects and 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was imported for reuse at site
in the reporting month. 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was disposed to
sorting facility and 0.40 tonnes of chemical waste was collected by licensed
contractors in the reporting period.
As
advised by the Zone 2B & 2C Contractor, 3712.87 tonnes and 11523.41 tonnes
of inert C&D material were disposed of as public fill to Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Public Fill and Tuen Mun Area 38 Public Fill respectively, while 14.07
tonnes of general refuse were disposed of at SENT landfill. 00.00 tonne of
metals, 0.0 tonne of paper/cardboard packaging, 0.0 tonne of plastics and 0.0
tonne of timber was collected by recycling contractors in the reporting month.
2091.32 tonnes of inert C&D material were reused on site. 0.0 tonnes of
inert C&D material were reused in other projects and 0.0 tonne of inert
C&D material was imported for reuse at site in the reporting month. 0.0
tonne of inert C&D material was disposed to sorting facility and 0.0 tonne of chemical waste was collected by licensed contractors in the
reporting period.
The cumulative waste generation
records for Zone 2A and Zone 2B & 2C are shown in Appendix I.
The environmental permits,
licenses, and/or notifications on environmental protection for this Project
which were valid during the period are summarised in Table 4.3.
Table 4.3: Status
of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for Zone 2A
Permit
/ License No. /
Notification / Reference
No. |
Valid
Period |
Status |
Remarks |
|
From |
To |
|||
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
||||
WPN5113-256-B2597-01 |
10-Sep-20 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
Billing
Account Construction Waste Disposal |
||||
7037500 |
09-Jun-20 |
-- |
Account Active |
-- |
Construction
Noise Permit |
||||
GW-RE-1064-21 |
11-Nov-21 |
10-Feb-22 |
Valid |
Piling Works |
Wastewater
Discharge License |
||||
WT00037344-2021 |
01-Feb-21 |
28-Feb-26 |
Valid |
-- |
Notification
under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
||||
456376 |
21-May-20 |
-- |
Notified |
-- |
The environmental permits,
licenses, and/or notifications on environmental protection for this Project
which were valid during the period are summarised in Table 4.4.
Table 4.4: Status
of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for Zone 2B & 2C
Permit /
License No. /
Notification / Reference
No. |
Valid Period |
Status |
Remarks |
|
From |
To |
|||
Chemical
Waste Producer Registration |
||||
WPN5113-256-V2302-01 |
17-Aug-21 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
Billing
Account Construction Waste Disposal |
||||
7041264 |
11-Aug-21 |
-- |
Account Active |
-- |
Construction
Noise Permit |
||||
GW-RE1288-21 |
22-Dec-21 |
21-Feb-22 |
Valid |
-- |
Wastewater
Discharge License |
||||
WT00039734-2021 |
25-Nov-21 |
30-Nov-26 |
Valid |
-- |
Notification
under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
||||
470022 |
29-Jul-21 |
-- |
Notified |
-- |
The EM&A programme followed
the recommended mitigation measures in the EM&A Manual. The EM&A
requirements as well as the summary of implementation status of the
environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix J. In particular, the following
mitigation measures were brought to attention during the site inspections:
Temporary
Water Drainage System & Water Quality
– The temporary drainage system should be well managed and updated
with the site condition.
– Addition water pump shall provide if necessary, to prevent water accumulate on site.
– Noise
barriers should be properly set up to minimize Noise impact to NSRs.
Air
Quality
– Idle
stockpile should be fully covered when not in use or removed from the site.
Waste Management
–
Chemical wastes should
be properly placed with drip trays/removed to storage area to prevent
chemical spillage.
–
Appropriate C&D material sorting should be set
up on site for reuse, recycling or transfer to other project in order to
minimize the disposal at public fill.
The status
of the required submission under the EP during the reporting period is
summarized in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1: Status of Submissions under the Environmental Permit
EP Condition |
Submission |
Submission
Date |
Condition 3.4 |
Monthly EM&A Report for December 2021 |
13 January 2022 |
There was no breach of Action or Limit Levels for Air Quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and Construction Noise in the reporting month.
No environmental
complaint was received in the reporting month.
The cumulative statistics on complaints were provided in Appendix K.
No notifications of summons or successful prosecutions were received this month. The cumulative statistics on notifications of summons and successful prosecutions were provided in Appendix K.
The major site works for Zone 2A
scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:
Zone 2A-1
● ELS (Stage 1) – Grouting / Pipe Pile Works
– King Post & Erection of Steel Column for Working Platform
Zone 2A-2
● ELS (Stage 1) – Grouting / Pipe Pile Works
– King Post
– Stage 1a & 1b Grouting
– Pipe Pile Construction
The major site works for Zone 2B
& 2C scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:
KD01 (Stage 1-1), KD05 (Section 1), KD06 (Section 2), KD09 (Section 5)
● Bored Pile Works
– Predrilling, RCD Drilling, Airlifting, Cage Installation & Concreting and Excavation
KD02 (Stage 5-1), KD08 (Section 4)
● Bored Pile Works
– RCD Drilling, Airlifting, Cage Installation & Concreting and Excavation
KD03 (Stage 3-1), KD07 (Section 3)
● Bored Pile Works
– RCD Drilling and Excavation
Key issues to be considered in
the coming month include:
●
Generation of dust from construction works;
● Noise impact from piling works;
● Generation of site surface
runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;
● The temporary drainage system
should be well managed and updated with the site condition, particularly on
rainy days;
● Management of stockpiles and
slopes, particularly on rainy days;
● Management of chemicals and
avoidance of oil spillage on-site.
● Sorting, recycling, storage and
disposal of general refuse and construction waste; and
Key issues to be considered in
the coming month include:
● Generation of dust from
construction works;
● Noise impact from piling works;
● Generation of site surface
runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;
● Management of stockpiles and slopes,
particularly on rainy days;
● Sorting, recycling, storage and
disposal of general refuse and construction waste; and
● Management of chemicals and
avoidance of oil spillage on-site.
The environmental site inspection and environmental monitoring will be continued in the coming month. Impact monitoring for air quality and noise for Zone 2A and Zone 2B & 2C in accordance with the approved EM&A Manual has commenced since 3 October 2020 and 30 September 2021 respectively. The tentative monitoring schedule for the coming month is shown in the Appendix E.
The EM&A programme as recommended in the EM&A Manual has been undertaken with the commencement of the construction activities at Zone 2A on 3 October 2020, and the major construction works of Zone 2B & 2C commenced on 30 September 2021.
Monitoring of air quality and noise with respect to the Projects is
underway. In particular, the 1-hour TSP, 24-hour TSP, noise level (as Leq, 30 minutes) under monitoring have been
checked against established Action and Limit levels. There was no breach of
Action or Limit levels for Air Quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and
Construction Noise monitoring in this reporting month.
No environmental complaint was
recorded in the reporting month. No notifications of summons or successful prosecutions were
received during the reporting month.
Weekly
construction phase site inspections and bi-weekly landscape and visual impact
inspections were conducted during the reporting month as required. It was
observed that the Contractors had implemented all possible and feasible
mitigation measures to mitigate the potential environmental impacts during
construction phase works.
Potential environmental impacts
due to the construction activities, including air quality, noise, water quality, waste, landscape and visual, will
be monitored or reviewed. The recommended environmental mitigation measures
shall be implemented on site and regular inspections as required will be
carried out to ensure that the environmental conditions are acceptable.