3.1
Monitoring Requirements
In
accordance with the EM&A Manual, baseline air quality monitoring (1-hour
and 24-hour average Total Suspended Particulate (
1-hr and 24-hour
3.2
Monitoring Methodology
Instrumentation
High
Volume Samplers (HVS) completed with appropriate sampling inlets were employed
for air quality monitoring. Each sampler was composed of a motor, a filter
holder, a flow controller and a sampling inlet and its performance
specification complies with that required by USEPA Standard Title 40, Code of
Federation Regulations Chapter 1 (Part 50).
HVS Installation
The following guidelines were adopted during the
installation of HVS:
§
Sufficient
support is provided to secure the samplers against gusty wind.
§
No
two samplers are placed less than 2 meters apart.
§
The
distance between the sampler and an obstacle, such as buildings, is at least
twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the sampler.
§
A
minimum of 2 meters of separation from walls, parapets and penthouses is
required for rooftop samples.
§
A
minimum of 2 meters separation from any supporting structure, measured
horizontally is required.
§
No
furnaces or incineration flues are nearby.
§
Airflow
around the samplers is unrestricted.
§
The
samplers are more than 20 meters from the drip line.
§
Any
wire fence and gate, to protect the sampler, should not cause any obstruction
during monitoring.
Filters Preparation
Fiberglass filters (G810) were used (Note: these filters
have a collection efficiency of larger than 99% for particles of 0.3 mm
diameter). A HOKLAS accredited laboratory is responsible for the preparation of
24-hr conditioned and pre-weighed filter papers for monitoring team.
All filters
are equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing.
The conditioning environment temperature is around 25°C and not variable by
more than ±3°C; the relative humidity (RH) is < 50% and not variable by more
than ±5%. A convenient working RH is 40%.
Operating/Analytical
Procedures for 1-hour and 24-hour
Operating / analytical procedures for the air quality
monitoring are highlighted as follows:
n
Prior
to the commencement of the dust sampling, the flow rate of the HVS are properly
set (between 1.1 m³ /min. and 1.4 m³ /min.) in accordance with the
manufacturer's instruction to within the range recommended in USEPA Standard
Title 40,
n
The
power supply shall be checked to ensure the samplers worked properly.
n
On
sampling, the samplers shall be operated for 5 minutes to establish thermal
equilibrium before placing any filter media at the designated air quality
monitoring station.
n
The
filter holding frame is then removed by loosening the four nuts and carefully a
weighted and conditioned filter is centered with the stamped number upwards, on
a supporting screen.
n
The
filter shall be aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight
seal on the outer edges of the filter. Then the filter holding frame is
tightened to the filter holder with swing bolts. The applied pressure should be
sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.
n
The
shelter lid shall be closed and secured with the aluminum strip.
n
The
timer is then programmed. Information shall be recorded on the record sheet,
which included the starting time, the weather condition and the filter number
(the initial weight of the filter paper can be found out by using the filter
number).
n
After
sampling, the filter shall be removed and sent to laboratory for weighing. The
elapsed time is also recorded.
n
Before
weighing, all filters are equilibrated in a conditioning environment for 24
hours. The conditioning environment temperature should be between 25°C and 30°C
and not vary by more than ±3°C; the relative humidity (RH) should be < 50%
and not vary by more than ±5%. A convenient working RH is 40%. Weighing results
are returned to
3.3
Name of
Laboratory and Types of Equipment Used and Calibration Details
HOKLAS accredited laboratory –
Table
3.1 summarizes the equipment used in the baseline air quality monitoring
programme. Copies of the calibration certificates for the equipment are
presented in Appendix
A.
Table 3‑1 Air quality
monitoring equipment
Item |
Equipment |
Model Number |
Serial Number |
1 |
HVS Sampler Thermo HS2310 |
G310-1 |
2086 |
2 |
HVS Sampler Thermo HS2310 |
2091 |
|
3 |
HVS Sampler Thermo HS2310 |
2088 |
|
4 |
HVS Sampler Tisch TE-5170 |
TE-5005X |
3841 |
5 |
HVS Sampler Tisch TE-5170 |
3834 |
|
6 |
HVS Sampler Tisch TE-5170 |
3835 |
|
7 |
HVS Sampler Tisch TE-5170 |
3796 |
|
8 |
HVS Sampler Tisch TE-5170 |
3802 |
|
|
HVS Sampler Calibrator |
Tisch TE-5025A |
2456 |
Maintenance / Calibration for 1-hour
and 24-hour Air Quality Monitoring
The following maintenance / calibration are required for the
HVS:
n
The
high volume motors and their accessories are properly maintained. Appropriate
maintenance such as routine motor brushes replacement and electrical wiring
checking are made to ensure that the equipments and necessary power supply are
in good working condition.
n
All
HVS shall be calibrated (five point calibration) using Calibration Kit prior to
the commencement of the baseline monitoring.
n
A
copy of the calibration certificates for the HVS and calibrator are attached in
Appendix
A.
3.4
Parameters
Monitored
Table
3.2 summarizes the monitoring parameters, monitoring duration and
frequencies of air quality monitoring.
Table 3‑2 Monitoring
parameters, duration, frequency of air quality monitoring
Parameter |
Duration |
Frequency |
1-hr |
14
consecutive days |
1 hour x 3
per day |
24-hr |
14
consecutive days |
24 hours per day |
3.5
Monitoring
Locations
According to the EM&A Manual, four designated air quality monitoring
stations, AM1 to AM4 are selected as they are the representative air sensitive
receivers located near to the Project site. All designated air quality monitoring
stations listed in EM&A Manual and alternative environmental monitoring
locations are summarized in the following table:
Table 3‑3 Monitoring Locations
Designated Monitoring Stations in
EM&A Manual |
Alternative Monitoring Stations |
AM1 -
International Commerce Centre |
N/A |
AM2 - The |
N/A |
AM3 - The |
N/A |
AM4 - |
N/A |
Seeking Permission from Premises Owner for Setting Up Monitoring Station
Site
visit was conducted with the representatives of Property Management Company on
Subsequently, alternative air
monitoring stations had been explored on the podium level of Kowloon Station as
well as construction area of
Considering the fact that suitable
location for placing air quality monitoring equipment could not be identified
on the building of The Harbourside Tower 1 (please refer to photo in Appendix G), baseline
monitoring was then proposed to be conducted on the ground level right below
the podium of the ASRs after all the available options had been exhausted.
While baseline air monitoring could
not be arranged on or above the podium level of The Harbourside Tower 1, effort
will be made to lobby the owners committee in hope of getting their consent to
allow impact monitoring to be carried out during construction phase.
3.6
Monitoring
Date, Time, Frequency and Duration
The environmental monitoring schedule is shown in Table 3.4.
Table 3‑4 Monitoring
Schedule for Air Montiroing
|
MON |
TUE |
WED |
THU |
FRI |
|
20 Jul |
21 |
22 A1(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
23 A1(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
24 A1(1) A1(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
25 A1(1) A1(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
26 A1(1) A1(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
27 A1(1) A1(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
28 A1(1) A1(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
29 A1(1) A1(24) A2(1) A2(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
30 A1(1) A1(24) A2(1) A2(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
31 A1(1) A1(24) A2(1) A2(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
1 Aug A1(1) A1(24) A2(1) A2(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
2 A1(1) A1(24) A2(1) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
3 A1(1) A1(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) |
4 A1(1) A1(24) A2(1) A2(24) A3(1) A3(24) A4(1) A4(24) |
5 A1(1) A2(1) A2(24) A4(24) |
6 A1(1) A2(1) A2(24) |
7 A2(1) A2(24) |
8 A2(1) A2(24) |
9 A2(1) A2(24) |
10 A2(1) A2(24) |
11 A2(1) A2(24) |
12 A2(1) A2(24) |
13 |
14 |
15 A2(24) |
16 |
Note:
n
A1(1), A2(1), A3(1), A4(1): 1-hr
n
A1(24), A2(24), A3(24),
A4(24): 24-hr
n
1-hr
n
Due to the electricity shortage, monitoring of 1-hour and 24-hour
n
Due to electricity
shortage, monitoring of 24-hour
3.7
Baseline
Monitoring Observations
According to on-site
observation, the
influencing factor in the vicinity of the monitoring stations was recorded. A
summary of the weather and influencing factors for baseline monitoring works is
given below:
Table 3‑5 Summary of the
Weather and Influencing Factors for Baseline Monitoring Works
Monitoring Stations |
Date |
Influencing Factors And Major Activities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AM1 |
July 2014 |
Aug 2014 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
05 |
06 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AM2 |
July
2014 |
Aug
2014 |
Road
traffic dust and |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 |
30 |
31 |
01 |
02 |
04 |
05 |
06 |
07 |
08 |
09 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
15 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AM3 |
July 2014 |
Aug 2014 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AM4 |
July 2014 |
Aug 2014 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
05 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remarks
Sunny |
|
Cloudy |
|
Rainy |
|
Sunday |
|
3.8
Quality
Assurance (QA) / Quality Control (QC) Results and Detection Limits
3.9
Results
Baseline
air quality monitoring was conducted at 4 monitoring stations, namely AM1, AM2,
AM3 and AM4 in the period between
The monitoring data are
summarized in Tables 3.6 and 3.7. All monitoring data of 1-hour
and 24-hour
Table 3‑6 Summary of Baseline 1-hour
Monitoring Station |
Average (Range) |
AM1 |
36.4 (5.7 – 84.9) |
AM2 |
37.2 (5.6 – 122.2) |
AM3 |
46.7 (5.9 – 160.7) |
AM4 |
43.9 (5.3 – 148.4) |
Table 3‑7 Summary of Baseline 24-hour
Monitoring Station |
Average (Range) |
AM1 |
20.9 (8.6 – 44.4) |
AM2 |
32.5 (10.9 – 59.0) |
AM3 |
34.4 (11.0 – 70.8) |
AM4 |
34.7 (6.1 – 60.5) |
3.10
Action and Limit Levels
The Action and Limit Levels have been set in accordance with the EM&A
Manual, which are summarized in Table
3.8.
Table 3‑8 Guidelines for Establishing
Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality
Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
1-hour in µg/m³ |
For baseline level ≤384µg/m³, Action level =
(Baseline level * 1.3 + Limit level)/2 For baseline level
> 384µg/m³, Action level = Limit
level |
500 |
24-hour in µg/m³ |
For baseline level ≤200µg/m³, Action level =
(Baseline level * 1.3 + Limit level)/2 For baseline level
> 200µg/m³, Action level = Limit
level |
260 |
Following the above guidelines, the Action and Limit Levels for air
quality impact monitoring have been set, as presented in Tables 3.9
and 3.10.
Table 3‑9 Action and Limit Levels for
1-hour
Location |
Action Level, µg/m³ |
Limit Level, µg/m³ |
AM1 |
273.7 |
500 |
AM2 |
274.2 |
|
AM3 |
280.4 |
|
AM4 |
278.5 |
Table 3‑10 Action and Limit Levels for
24-hour
Location |
Action Level, µg/m³ |
Limit Level, µg/m³ |
AM1 |
143.6 |
260 |
AM2 |
151.1 |
|
AM3 |
152.4 |
|
AM4 |
152.6 |
The Event and Action Plan for Air Quality is
given in Table
3-11.
Table 3‑11 Typical Event and Action Plan for
Air Quality
Event |
ET |
IEC |
WKCDA |
Contractor |
Action
Level |
|
|||
1. Exceedance for
one sample |
1.
Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance and propose
remedial measures; 2.
Inform IEC and WKCDA; 3.
Repeat measurement to confirm finding; 4.
Increase monitoring frequency to daily. |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2.
Check Contractor’s working method. |
1. Notify Contractor |
1.
Rectify any unacceptable practice; 2.
Amend working methods if appropriate. |
2. Exceedance for
two or more consecutive samples |
1.
Identify source; 2.
Inform IEC and WKCDA; 3.
Advise the WKCDA on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 4.
Repeat measurements to confirm findings; 5.
Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 6.
Discuss with IEC and Contractor on remedial actions required; 7.
If exceedance continues, arrange meeting with IEC and WKCDA; 8.
If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2.
Check Contractor’s working method; 3.
Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures; 4.
Advise the ET on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 5.
Monitor the implementation of remedial measures. |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2.
Notify Contractor; 3.
Ensure remedial measures properly implemented. |
1.
Submit proposals for remedial to WKCDA within three working days of
notification; 2.
Implement the agreed proposals; 3.
Amend proposal if appropriate. |
Limit
Level |
|
|||
1. Exceedance for
one sample |
1.
Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance and propose remedial measures; 2.
Inform WKCDA, Contractor and 3.
Repeat measurement to confirm finding; 4.
Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 5.
Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2.
Check Contractor’s working method; 3.
Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures; 4.
Advise the WKCDA on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 5.
Monitor the implementation of remedial measures. |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2.
Notify Contractor; 3.
Ensure remedial measures
properly implemented. |
1.
Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance; 2.
Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within three working days of
notification; 3.
Implement the agreed proposals; 4.
Amend proposal if appropriate. |
2. Exceedance for
two or more consecutive samples |
1.
Notify IEC, WKCDA, Contractor and 2.
Identify source; 3.
Repeat measurement to confirm findings; 4.
Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 5.
Carry out analysis of Contractor’s working procedures to determine possible
mitigation to be implemented; 6.
Arrange meeting with IEC and WKCDA to discuss the remedial actions to be
taken; 7.
Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, 8. If exceedance stops,
cease additional monitoring. |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2.
Check Contractor’s working method; 3.
Discuss amongst WKCDA, ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial actions; 4.
Review Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary to assure their
effectiveness and advise the WKCDA accordingly; 5.
Monitor the implementation of remedial measures. |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2.
Notify Contractor; 3.
In consolidation with the IEC, agree with the Contractor on the remedial
measures to be implemented; 4.
Ensure remedial measures properly implemented; 5.
If exceedance continues, consider what portion of the work is
responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that portion of work until
the exceedance is abated. |
1.
Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance; 2.
Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within three working days of
notification; 3.
Implement the agreed proposals; 4.
Resubmit proposals if problem still not under control; 5.
Stop the relevant portion of works as determined by the WKCDA until the exceedance is
abated. |
2. Exceedance for
two or more consecutive samples |
1.
Identify source; 2.
Inform IEC and WKCDA; 3.
Advise the WKCDA on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 4.
Repeat measurements to confirm findings; 5.
Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 6.
Discuss with IEC and Contractor on remedial actions required; 7.
If exceedance continues, arrange meeting with IEC and WKCDA; 8.
If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring. |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2.
Check Contractor’s working method; 3.
Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures; 4.
Advise the ET on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 5.
Monitor the implementation of remedial measures. |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2.
Notify Contractor; 3.
Ensure remedial measures properly implemented. |
1.
Submit proposals for remedial to WKCDA within three working days of
notification; 2.
Implement the agreed proposals; 3.
Amend proposal if appropriate. |
Limit
Level |
|
|||
1. Exceedance for
one sample |
1.
Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance and propose remedial measures; 2.
Inform WKCDA, Contractor and 3.
Repeat measurement to confirm finding; 4.
Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 5.
Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2.
Check Contractor’s working method; 3.
Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial measures; 4.
Advise the WKCDA on the effectiveness of the proposed remedial measures; 5.
Monitor the implementation of remedial measures. |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2.
Notify Contractor; 3.
Ensure remedial measures
properly implemented. |
1.
Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance; 2.
Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within three working days of
notification; 3.
Implement the agreed proposals; 4.
Amend proposal if appropriate. |
2. Exceedance for
two or more consecutive samples |
1.
Notify IEC, WKCDA, Contractor and 2.
Identify source; 3.
Repeat measurement to confirm findings; 4.
Increase monitoring frequency to daily; 5.
Carry out analysis of Contractor’s working procedures to determine possible
mitigation to be implemented; 6.
Arrange meeting with IEC and WKCDA to discuss the remedial actions to be
taken; 7.
Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC, 8. If exceedance stops,
cease additional monitoring. |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET; 2.
Check Contractor’s working method; 3.
Discuss amongst WKCDA, ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial actions; 4.
Review Contractor’s remedial actions whenever necessary to assure their
effectiveness and advise the WKCDA accordingly; 5.
Monitor the implementation of remedial measures. |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing; 2.
Notify Contractor; 3.
In consolidation with the IEC, agree with the Contractor on the remedial
measures to be implemented; 4.
Ensure remedial measures properly implemented; 5.
If exceedance continues, consider what portion of the work is
responsible and instruct the Contractor to stop that portion of work until
the exceedance is abated. |
1.
Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance; 2.
Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within three working days of
notification; 3.
Implement the agreed proposals; 4.
Resubmit proposals if problem still not under control; 5.
Stop the relevant portion of works as determined by the WKCDA until the
exceedance is abated. |