Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Limited (MMHK) was commissioned to undertake the Environmental Team (ET) services (including environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A)) for the construction of M+ Museum Main Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/022) and Lyric Theatre Complex including the Foundation Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/014), L1 Contract (Contract No. CC/2017/3A/030) and L2 Contract (Contract No. CC/2017/3A/031) at West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD) (The Project) as part of the WKCD development. The Project Proponent is the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority (WKCDA). The construction works and EM&A programme for M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex commenced on 31 October 2015 and 1 March 2016 respectively.

The overall works for the WKCD fall under two separate categories of Designated Project (DP) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), namely an “engineering feasibility study of urban development projects with a study area covering more than 20 ha or involving a total population of more than 100 000” (Item 3 of Schedule 3) and “an underpass more than 100m in length under the built areas” (Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2). An Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/B (EP) was issued with respect to the “Underpass Road and Austin Road Flyover Serving the West Kowloon Cultural District” which specifically includes the abovementioned category of DP under Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO.

This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works at M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex (L1 and L2 Contract) from 1 April to 30 April 2020.

Exceedance of Action and Limit Levels

There was no breach of Action or Limit levels for Air Quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and Noise in this reporting month.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures

Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 7, 14, 21 and 28 April 2020 for M+ Museum and 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29 April 2020 for Lyric Theatre Complex (L1 and L2 Contract) to confirm the implementation measures undertaken by the Contractors in the reporting month. The outcomes are presented in Section 4 and the status of implementation of mitigation measures in the site is shown in Appendix J.

Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the abovementioned weekly site inspections during the reporting month. No adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.

FEHD site inspections with the contractor were conducted on 3 and 24 April 2020 at M+ Museum.

FEHD site inspections with contractor was conducted on 9 April 2020 at Lyric Theatre Complex (L1 and L2 Contract).

Record of Complaints

One environmental complaint was recorded in the reporting month.

Record of Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

No notifications of summons and successful prosecutions were recorded in the reporting month.

Future Key Issues

The major site works for M+ Museum scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

● Structure

– M+ Podium: Structural works completed

– CSF RF: Structural works completed

– RDE RF: Structural works completed

● MEP

– BEL, BLT, ELV, BFS, BPD, BME works from B2 to 16/F of M+

– BEL, BLT, ELV, BFS, BPD, BME works from G/F to 15/F of RDE

– MEP works at CSF building majority finished

– T&C for M+ / CSF

● ABWF

– M+ B2F – 3/F Basement & Podium, Screeding, wall plastering, finishing & Paving works, installation of fire shutter, toilets / sanitary fitment installation, make good & finishes works

– M+ Tower - paint/sealer, plaster, toilets / sanitary fitment installation, make good & finishes works

– CSF – majority ABWF works at CSF accomplished, make good & defect rectification

– RDE up to 15/F – blockwall, plastering, Artwall/drywall stud erection, False ceiling sub-frame installation, paving & flooring works

● Other

– M+ G/F – Paving works

– M+ 3/F Podium Roof – landscaping works (soil mix), drainage mat / cable installation

– Paving works at M+ 1/F, G/F

The major site works for L1 scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

● Excavation work at Main Cofferdam

● Drainage work (PIW works)

● Extended basement structure construction of Area 06 and Main Cofferdam

The major site works for L2 scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

● Visual Mock Up

– VMU interior work

● LTC construction

– B2, B2U/F, B1L/F, B1, B1M and L00 construction

– Falsework and Formwork Erection

– Reinforcement work

– Concrete work

● Extended Basement

– BS installation (south B2)

● DSC Cofferdam A

– DCS Cofferdam A – Section 2

● Remaining Works for M+ Promenade

● Modification to Existing Pump Cell

– Reprovision of Sea Water Pump Cell

– Modification of Existing Pump Cell, & Connection to New Pump Cell

Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities, including air, noise, water quality, waste, landscape and visual, will be monitored or reviewed. The recommended environmental mitigation measures shall be implemented on site and regular inspections as required will be carried out to ensure that the environmental conditions are acceptable.

1 Introduction

1.1 Background

The M+ Museum development aims to provide an iconic presence for the M+ Museum, semi-transparent vertical plane, housing education facilities, a public restaurant and museum offices. At ground and lower levels, generous access will be provided to the park and other West Kowloon Cultural District facilities, alongside a public resource centre, theatres, retail and dining, and back-of-house functions.

The 1,200-seat Lyric Theatre Complex will be Hong Kong’s first world-class facility for dance performances, including ballet, contemporary and Chinese dance forms. In the run up to the opening of further major performing arts venues in the WKCD, it will also be used for a wide variety of performing arts events including drama, opera and musical performances. The Lyric Theatre Complex will act as a platform for Hong Kong’s leading arts organisations and be a new major venue to show programmes from Asia and worldwide.

The Monthly EM&A Report is prepared in accordance with the Condition 3.4 of the Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/B. This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works at M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex (L1 and L2 Contract) from 1 April to 30 April 2020. The purpose of this report is to summarise the findings in the EM&A of the project over the reporting period.

1.2 Project Organisation

The organisation chart and lines of communication with respect to the on-site environmental management structure together with the contact information of the key personnel are shown in Appendix A.

1.3 Environmental Status in the Reporting Period

During the reporting period, construction works at M+ Museum undertaken include:

● Structure

– M+ Podium: Structural works completed

– CSF RF: Structural works completed

– RDE RF: Structural works completed

● MEP

– BEL, BLT, ELV, BFS, BPD, BME works from B2 to 16/F of M+

– BEL, BLT, ELV, BFS, BPD, BME works from G/F to 15/F of RDE

– MEP works at CSF building majority finished

– T&C for M+ / CSF

● ABWF

– M+ B2F – 3/F Basement & Podium, Screeding, wall plastering, finishing & Paving works, installation of fire shutter, toilets / sanitary fitment installation

– M+ Tower - paint/sealer, plaster, toilets / sanitary fitment installation, make good & finishes works

– CSF – majority ABWF works at CSF accomplished, make good & defect rectification

– RDE up to 15F – blockwall, plastering, Artwall/drywall stud erection, False ceiling sub-frame installation, paving & flooring works

● Other

– M+ G/F - Paving works;

– M+ 3F Podium Roof - landscaping works (soil mix), drainage mat / cable installation, Gallery Roof Panel installation

– Paving works at M+ 1/F, G/F & B1/F

During the reporting period, construction works at L1 undertaken include:

● Excavation work at Main Cofferdam

● Drainage work (PIW works)

● Extended basement structure construction of Area 06 and Main Cofferdam

During the reporting period, construction works at L2 undertaken include:

● Visual Mock Up

– VMU interior work

● LTC construction

– B2 construction

– B2U/F and B1L/F construction

– B1 construction

– Formwork

– Reinforcement work

– Concrete work

● Extended Basement

– BS installation (south B2)

● DSC Cofferdam A

– DCS Cofferdam A ‐ Section 2

● Remaining Works for M+ Promenade

● Modification to Existing Pump Cell

– Reprovision of Sea Water Pump Cell

– Modification of Extg Pump Cell, & Connection to New Pump Cell

The Construction Works Programme of M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex (L1 and L2 Contract) is provided in Appendix B. A layout plan of the Project is provided in Figure 1. Please refer to Table 4.4, Table 4.5 and Table 4.6 on the status if the environmental licenses.

1.4 Summary of EM&A Requirements

The EM&A programme requires environmental monitoring of air quality, noise, landscape and visual as specified in the approved EM&A Manual.

A summary of impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 1.1.

Table 1.1: Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements

Parameters	Descriptions	Locations	Frequencies
Air Quality	24-Hour TSP	AM1 - International Commerce Centre	At least once every 6 days
	1-Hour TSP	AM1 - International Commerce Centre	At least 3 times every 6 days
	24-Hour TSP	AM2B - 1st Floor of Gammon’s Site Office	At least once every 6 days
	1-Hour TSP	AM2B - 1st Floor of Gammon’s Site Office	At least 3 times every 6 days
Noise	Leq, 30 minutes	NM1A - International Commerce Centre	Weekly
Landscape & Visual	Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation measures during the construction stage	As described in Table 9.1 and 9.2 of the EM&A Manual	Bi-weekly

Given that the Project covers only a small part of the whole WKCD area (i.e. M+ Museum, Lyric Theatre Complex and respective portions of underpass road), it was proposed that the EM&A programme for the Project should only require 1 noise monitoring station and 2 air quality monitoring stations located closest to the Project area. Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring stations AM1, AM2 and NM1 were set up. Other monitoring locations are too far away (i.e. AM3 to AM5 and NM2 to NM5) are not included in this EM&A programme until the construction of the corresponding area commences.

The Harbourside management office formally rejected our proposal of setting up air quality and noise monitoring equipment on its premises at the podium level of Tower 1 (AM2/NM1) on 10 November 2015. Alternative noise monitoring location was identified at The Arch (NM2), however The Arch management office formally rejected our proposal of setting up noise monitoring equipment on its premises on 23 November 2015. Nevertheless, suitable air quality monitoring location at AM2 was identified on the ground floor in front of The Harbourside Tower 1, which is at the same location as that of baseline monitoring for consistency. No management approval is required at the ground floor for conducting the air monitoring. However, the electricity supply at AM2 was suspended from 31 August 2016 and was no longer available. In order to have a more secure electricity supply, an alternative air monitoring location (AM2A) was identified at Austin Road West opposite to The Harbourside Tower 1, which is close to Lyric Theatre Complex site entrance. This alternative air monitoring location was approved by EPD on 28 September 2016. Due to works programme, the air monitoring location AM2A has been relocated to the alternative monitoring location AM2B at the 1st floor of Gammon’s site office, which was approved by EPD on 21 February 2019. Meanwhile, the opportunity of setting up the air monitoring location at The Harbourside is being explored. Noise monitoring at G/F of Harbourside will not be representative. Approval from the management office of the International Commerce Centre has been granted on 29 February 2016 for conducting noise monitoring at the alternative noise monitoring location identified at the podium floor (NM1A) which is free from screening to the construction activities. Therefore, 2 air quality monitoring stations and 1 noise impact monitoring station were confirmed for the impact monitoring.

The Environmental Quality Performance Limits for air quality and noise are shown in Appendix C.

The Event and Action Plan for air quality, construction noise. landscape and visual are shown in Appendix D.

2 Impact Monitoring Methodology

2.1 Introduction

For air quality and noise, the monitoring methodology, including the monitoring locations, monitoring equipment used, monitoring parameters, and frequency and duration etc., for air quality and noise are detailed in this Section. The environmental monitoring schedules for the reporting period and the tentative monitoring Schedule for the coming month are provided in Appendix E.

For landscape and audit impact, the relevant EM&A monitoring requirements and details are also presented in this Section.

2.2 Air Quality

2.2.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Table 2.1 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of the TSP monitoring.

Table 2.1: Air Quality Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Parameter	Frequency	Duration
24-hour TSP	At least once in every six-days	24 hours
1-hour TSP	At least 3 times every six-days	60 minutes

2.2.2 Monitoring Locations

Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring stations AM1 and AM2B were set up at the proposed locations in accordance with updated EM&A Manual. Location of the monitoring station is given in Table 2.2 and shown in Figure 1.

Table 2.2: Air Quality Monitoring Station

Monitoring Station	Location
AM1	International Commerce Centre (ICC)
AM2B	1st Floor of Gammon’s Site Office

2.2.3 Monitoring Equipment

Continuous 24-hour TSP air quality monitoring was conducted using High Volume Sampler (HVS) (Model: TE-5170) located at the designated monitoring station. The HVS meets all the requirements stated in of the EM&A Manual. Portable direct reading dust meter was used to carry out the 1-hour TSP monitoring. Table 2.3 summarizes the equipment used in the impact air quality monitoring. Copies of the calibration certificates for the HVS, calibration kit and portable dust meters are attached in Appendix F.

Table 2.3: TSP Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Model
24-hour TSP monitoring
High Volume Sampler	TE-5170 (Serial No.: 0767 and 8919)
Calibrator	TE-5025A (Orifice I.D.: 2454)
1-hour TSP monitoring
Portable direct reading dust meter	Sibata LD-3B (Serial No.: 235780 and 6Z7784)

Calibration of the HVS (five point calibration) using Calibration Kit was carried out every two months. The HVS calibration orifice will be calibrated annually. Calibration certificate of the TE-5025A Calibration Kit and the HVS are provided in Appendix F.

The 1-hour TSP monitoring should be determined periodically (e.g. annually) by the HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method.

2.2.4 Monitoring Methodology

24-hour TSP Monitoring

Installation

The HVS was installed at the site boundary. The following criteria were considered in the installation of the HVS.

– A horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the sampler against gusty wind was provided.

– The distance between the HVS and any obstacles, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the HVS.

– A minimum of 2 metres separation from walls, parapets and penthouse was required for rooftop sampler.

– A minimum of 2 metres separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally was required.

– No furnace or incinerator flues or building vent were nearby.

– Airflow around the sampler was unrestricted.

– The sampler has been more than 20 metres from any drip line.

– Permission was obtained to set up the sampler and to obtain access to the monitoring station.

– A secured supply of electricity is needed to operate the sampler.

Preparation of Filter Papers

– Glass fibre filters were labelled and sufficient filters that were clean and without pinholes were selected.

– The filters used are specified to have a minimum collection efficiency of 99 percent for 0.3 µm (DOP) particles.

– All filters were equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing. The conditioning environment temperature was around 25 °C and not variable by more than ±3 °C with relative humidity (RH) < 50% and was not variable by more than ±5 %. A convenient working RH was 40%. All preparation of filters was done by Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory.

Field Monitoring Procedures

– The power supply was checked to ensure the HVS works properly.

– The filter holder and the area surrounding the filter were cleaned.

– The filter holder was removed by loosening the four bolts and a new filter, with stamped number upward, on a supporting screen was aligned carefully.

– The filter was properly aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter.

– The swing bolts were fastened to hold the filter holder down to the frame. The pressure applied should be sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.

– The shelter lid was closed and was secured with the aluminium strip.

– The HVS was warmed-up for about 5 minutes to establish run-temperature conditions.

– A new flow rate record sheet was set into the flow recorder.

– The flow rate of the HVS was checked and adjusted at around 1.3 m³/min. The range specified in the EM&A Manual was between 0.6-1.7 m³/min.

– The programmable timer was set for a sampling period of 24 hours, and the starting time, weather condition and the filter number were recorded.

– The initial elapsed time was recorded.

– At the end of sampling, the sampled filter was removed carefully and folded in half length so that only surfaces with collected particulate matter were in contact.

– It was then placed in a clean plastic envelope and sealed.

– All monitoring information was recorded on a standard data sheet.

– Filters were sent to a Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory for analysis.

Maintenance and Calibration

– The HVS and its accessories are maintained in good working condition, such as replacing motor brushes routinely and checking electrical wiring to ensure a continuous power supply.

– HVSs were calibrated upon installation and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals. The calibration kits were calibrated annually.

– Calibration records for HVS and calibration kit are shown in Appendix F.

1-hour TSP Monitoring

Field Monitoring

The measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:

– Turn the power on.

– Close the air collecting opening cover.

– Push the “TIME SETTING” switch to [BG].

– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform background measurement for 6 seconds.

– Turn the knob at SENSI ADJ position to insert the light scattering plate.

– Leave the equipment for 1 minute upon “SPAN CHECK” is indicated in the display.

– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform automatic sensitivity adjustment. This measurement takes 1 minute.

– Pull out the knob and return it to MEASURE position.

– Setting time period of 1 hour for the 1-hour TSP measurement.

– Push “START/STOP” to start the 1-hour TSP measurement.

– Regular checking of the time period setting to ensure monitoring time of 1 hour.

Maintenance and Calibration

– The 1-hour dust meter would be checked at 3-month intervals and calibrated at 1-year intervals throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.

– Calibration records for direct dust meters are shown in Appendix F.

Weather Condition

– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.

2.3 Noise

2.3.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Table 2.4 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of noise monitoring. The noise in A-weighted levels L_eq, L₁₀ and L₉₀ are recorded in a 30-minute interval between 0700 and 1900 hours.

Table 2.4: Noise Monitoring Parameters, Period and Frequency

Time Period	Parameters	Frequency
Daytime on normal weekdays (0700-1900 hours)	L_eq(30 min), L₉₀(30 min) & L₁₀ (30 min)	Once every week

Time Period

Parameters

Frequency

Daytime on normal weekdays

(0700-1900 hours)

L_eq(30 min), L₉₀(30 min) & L₁₀ (30 min)

Once every week

2.3.2 Monitoring Location

Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring station NM1A was set up at the proposed location in accordance with updated EM&A Manual. Location of the monitoring station is given in Table 2.5 and shown in Figure 1.

Table 2.5: Noise Monitoring Station

Monitoring Station	Location
NM1A	International Commerce Centre (ICC)

2.3.3 Monitoring Equipment

Integrating Sound Level Meter was used for noise monitoring. It was a Type 1 sound level meter capable of giving a continuous readout of the noise level readings including equivalent continuous sound pressure level (L_Aeq) and percentile sound pressure level (L_x). They comply with International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1). Table 2.6 summarizes the noise monitoring equipment model being used.

Table 2.6: Noise Monitoring Equipment

Monitoring Station	Equipment Model
Monitoring Station	Integrating Sound Level Meter	Calibrator
NM1A	Rion NL-52 (Serial No. 00175561)	LARSON DAVIS CAL200 (Serial No. 11333)

2.3.4 Monitoring Methodology

Field Monitoring

– The microphone of the Sound Level Meter was set at least 1.2 m above the ground.

– Free Field measurement was made at the monitoring locations.

– The battery condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.

– Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:

- frequency weighting: A

- time weighting: Fast

- time measurement: 30 minutes intervals (between 0700-1900 on normal weekdays)

– Prior to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for 94 dB at 1 kHz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement was more than 1 dB, the measurement would be considered invalid and has to be repeated after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.

– During the monitoring period, the L_eq, L₁₀ and L₉₀ were recorded. In addition, any site observations and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.

– A correction of +3dB(A) was made to the free field measurements.

Maintenance and Calibration

– The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator is cleaned with soft cloth at quarterly intervals.

– The sound level meter and calibrator are sent to the supplier or HOKLAS laboratory to check and calibrate at yearly intervals.

– Calibration records are shown in Appendix F.

Weather Condition

– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.

2.4 Landscape and Visual

2.4.1 Monitoring Program

Table 2.7 details the monitoring program (as proposed in the WKCD EIA report) for landscape and visual impact during the construction phase.

Table 2.7: Monitoring Program for Landscape and Visual Impact during Construction Phase

Stage	Monitoring Task	Frequency	Report	Approval
Construction	Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation measures during the construction stage.	Bi-weekly	ET to report on Contractor’s compliance	Counter-signed by IEC

During the landscape and visual impact monitoring, any changes in relation to the landscape and visual amenity should be monitored with reference to the baseline conditions of the site. In addition, mitigation measures were proposed in the WKCD EIA report to minimise the landscape and visual impacts during the construction phase. The proposed mitigation measures as shown in Table 9.1 and Table 9.2 of the EM&A Manual should be checked for proper implementation.

3 Monitoring Results

3.1 Impact Monitoring

Construction impact monitoring for air quality, noise and landscape and visual impact was undertaken in compliance with the EM&A Manual during the reporting month.

3.2 Air Quality Monitoring

3.2.1 1-hour TSP

Results of 1-hour TSP at the monitoring location AM1 and AM2B are summarised in Table 3.1. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.

Table 3.1: Summary of 1-hour TSP monitoring results

Monitoring Station	Monitoring Date	Start Time	1-hour TSP (μg/m3)			Range (μg/m3)	Action Level (μg/m3)	Limit Level (μg/m3)
Monitoring Station	Monitoring Date	Start Time				Range (μg/m3)	Action Level (μg/m3)	Limit Level (μg/m3)
			1st Result	2nd Result	3rd Result
AM1	02-Apr-20	13:12	32	29	26	26-56	273.7	500
	08-Apr-20	13:14	29	36	40
	14-Apr-20	08:21	32	29	35
	18-Apr-20	13:12	43	52	56
	24-Apr-20	09:10	31	29	35
	28-Apr-20	08:30	37	42	45
AM2B	02-Apr-20	13:26	41	35	49	35-80	274.2	500
	08-Apr-20	13:28	44	41	50
	14-Apr-20	08:35	66	59	62
	18-Apr-20	13:26	69	74	77
	24-Apr-20	08:40	54	66	60
	28-Apr-20	09:15	80	66	69

3.2.2 24-hour TSP

Results of 24-hour TSP at the monitoring location AM1 and AM2B are summarised in Table 3.2. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.

Table 3.2: Summary of 24-hour TSP monitoring results

Monitoring Station	Monitoring Date	Start Time	Monitoring Results (μg/m³)	Range (μg/m³)	Action Level (μg/m³)	Limit Level (μg/m³)
AM1	02-Apr-20	08:10	19	19-29	143.6	260
	08-Apr-20	08:12	24
	14-Apr-20	08:23	25
	18-Apr-20	08:10	21
	24-Apr-20	07:50	29
	28-Apr-20	08:32	29
AM2B	02-Apr-20	08:24	56	44-82	151.1	260
	08-Apr-20	08:26	44
	14-Apr-20	08:37	82
	18-Apr-20	08:24	54
	24-Apr-20	08:42	77
	28-Apr-20	09:13	62

No exceedance of 1-hour and 24-hour TSP (Action or Limit Level) was recorded in the reporting period.

3.3 Noise Monitoring

The construction noise monitoring results at the monitoring location NM1A are summarized in Table 3.3. Graphical plots of the monitoring data and the station set-up of a free-field measurement are shown in Appendix G.

Table 3.3: Summary of noise monitoring results during normal weekdays

Monitoring Date	Start Time	End Time	L_eq (30 mins)*, dB(A)	Limit Level for L_eq (dB(A))
02-Apr-20	10:32	11:02	68	75
08-Apr-20	10:37	11:07	69
14-Apr-20	10:42	11:12	68
24-Apr-20	10:19	10:49	70
28-Apr-20	08:27	08:57	70

Remarks:

* +3dB (A) correction was applied to free-field measurement.

No exceedance (Action/Limit Level) of construction noise was recorded in the reporting period.

3.4 Landscape and Visual Impact

Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the weekly site inspections on 14 and 28 April 2020 for M+ Museum, and 8 and 22 April 2020 for Lyric Theatre Complex (L1 and L2 Contract) during the reporting month. As reviewed by the registered Landscape Architect, no adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.

The landscape and visual mitigation measures were implemented during the reporting period. The summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures is provided in Appendix J.

4 Environmental Site Inspection

4.1 Site Inspection

4.1.1 M+ Museum

Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 7, 14, 21 and 28 April 2020. The joint site inspection with IEC, ET, ER and Contractor was held on 21 April 2020. All observations have been recorded in the site inspection checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate recommended mitigation measures where necessary.

FEHD site inspections with contractor were conducted on 3 and 24 April 2020. FEHD reminded stagnant water trapped under the material storage should be removed regularly or applied with larvicide if necessary on 3 April 2020 site inspection. No adverse comment was made on 24 April 2020 site inspection.

The key observations from the site inspections and associated recommendations are summarized in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1: Summary of Site Inspections and Recommendations for M+ Museum

Inspection Date	Parameter	Observation / Recommendation	Contactor’s Responses / Action(s) Undertaken	Close-out (Date)
07-Apr-20	Water Quality	Effluent quality of wetsep was checked. It was found visually clear when compared with standard solution and within proper pH range.	N/A	N/A
14-Apr-20	Noise Impact	Breaker was observed without noise-insulating fabric at Gate 7. The contractor was reminded to provide noise-insulating fabric to avoid noise impact.	The contractor has provided noise-insulating fabric for the breaker.	14-Apr-20
14-Apr-20	Water Quality	Effluent quality of wetsep was checked. It was found visually clear when compared with standard solution and within proper pH range.	N/A	N/A
21-Apr-20	Water Quality	Effluent quality of wetsep was checked. It was found visually clear when compared with standard solution and within proper pH range.	N/A	N/A
28-Apr-20	Air Quality	Dusty road was observed at the soil storage area. The contractor was reminded to increase water spraying frequency to avoid dust impact.	The contractor has increased water spraying frequency to the road to avoid dust impact.	05-May-20
28-Apr-20	Water Quality	Effluent quality of wetsep was checked. It was found visually clear when compared with standard solution and within proper pH range.	N/A	N/A
28-Apr-20	Air Quality	The contractor was reminded to cover the stockpile with impervious sheeting by the end of the working day and enhance the wheel washing at the soil storage area.	The contractor has covered the stockpile with impervious sheeting and enhanced the wheel washing at the soil storage area.	05-May-20

4.1.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29 April 2020 (L1 and L2 Contract). The joint site inspection with IEC, ET, ER and Contractor was held on 22 April 2020. All observations have been recorded in the site inspection checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate recommended mitigation measures where necessary.

FEHD site inspection with contractor was conducted on 9 April 2020. No adverse comment was made for both L1 and L2 Contract. FEHD only reminded L2 to remove the stagnant water on the tarpaulin sheet for springs or provide mosquito mitigation measures for the stagnant water on the tarpaulin sheet.

The key observations from the site inspections and associated recommendations are summarized in Table 4.2 and Table 4.3.

Table 4.2: Summary of Site Inspections and Recommendations for L1

Inspection Date	Parameter	Observation / Recommendation	Contactor’s Responses / Action(s) Undertaken	Close-out (Date)
01-Apr-20	Water Quality	Algae was observed at wetsep #1. The contractor was reminded to clear the algae to keep good quality of discharge water.	The contractor has cleared the algae at wetsep.	07-Apr-20
01-Apr-20	Waste Management	Oil leakage was observed at drip tray. The contractor was reminded to clean up the oil spill as soon as possible and treat the contaminated soil as chemical waste.	The contractor has cleaned up the oil spill and treated the contaminated soil as chemical waste.	07-Apr-20
08-Apr-20	Air Quality	The contractor was reminded to enhance the dust mitigation measures at Area 6 (e.g. increase water spraying frequency or clear the stockpile as soon as possible).	The contractor has removed the stockpile and increased water spraying frequency to prevent dust impact.	09-Apr-20
15-Apr-20	Waste Management	Oil leakage was observed at drip tray. The contractor was reminded to provide a proper trip tray and clean up the oil spill as chemical waste.	The machine and oil stain have been removed.	22-Apr-20
15-Apr-20	Air Quality	The contractor was reminded to cover the stockpile near wetsep #1 with impervious sheeting to avoid dust impact.	The contractor has covered the stockpile with impervious sheeting.	16-Apr-20
22-Apr-20	Waste Management	Chemical containers were observed without cover and labelling. The contractor was reminded to ensure the container was securely closed and display a suitable chemical waste label.	Lid and proper label have been provided for the chemical waste and containers.	27-Apr-20
29-Apr-20	Air Quality	The contractor was reminded to increase water spraying frequency to the main cofferdam and the stockpile near wetsep #1 to avoid dust impact.	The contractor has increased water spraying frequency to the main cofferdam and the stockpile near wetsep #1 to avoid dust impact.	04-May-20

Table 4.3: Summary of Site Inspections and Recommendations for L2

Inspection Date	Parameter	Observation / Recommendation	Contactor’s Responses / Action(s) Undertaken	Close-out (Date)
-	-	-	-	-

4.2 Advice on the Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status

The Contractors have been registered as a chemical waste producer for the Project. Construction and demolition (C&D) material sorting will be carried out on site. A sufficient number of receptacles were available for general refuse collection.

4.2.1 M+ Museum

As advised by the Contractor, 0.0 tonne and 333.58 tonnes of inert C&D material were disposed of at Tuen Mun Area 38 and Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Public Fill respectively. 31.94 tonnes of inert C&D material were disposed of at Sorting Facility at Tseung Kwan O Area 137. 389.4 tonnes of general refuse were disposed of at SENT landfill. 406.5 tonnes of metal, 0.9 tonnes of paper/cardboard packaging, 0.0 tonne of plastic and 0.0 tonne of timber were collected by recycling contractors in the reporting month. 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was reused on site. 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was reused in other projects. 0.0 tonne of chemical waste was collected by licensed contractors in the reporting period.

The cumulative waste generation records for M+ Museum are shown in Appendix I.

4.2.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

As advised by the L1 Contractor, 1,256.33 tonnes and 2,125.86 tonnes of inert C&D material were disposed of at Tseung Kwan O Area 137 and Tuen Mun Area 38 Public Fill respectively, while 113.2 tonnes of general refuse were disposed of at SENT and WENT landfill. 1,123.9 tonnes of metal, 0.0 tonne of paper/cardboard packaging, 0.0 tonne of plastic and 0.0 tonne of timber were collected by recycling contractors in the reporting month. 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was reused on site. 1,615.7 tonnes of inert C&D materials were reused in other projects and 159.2 tonnes of inert C&D material were imported for reuse at site. 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was disposed to sorting facility and 0.0 tonne of chemical waste was collected by licensed contractors in the reporting period.

As advised by the L2 Contractor, 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was disposed of as public fill, and 0.0 tonne of general refuse was disposed to landfill. 0.0 tonne of metal, 0.0 tonne of paper/cardboard packaging, 0.0 tonne of plastic and 0.0 tonne of timber were collected by recycling contractors in the reporting month. 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was reused on site. 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was reused in other projects and 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was imported for reuse at site. 0.0 tonne of inert C&D material was disposed to sorting facility and 0.0 tonne of chemical waste was collected by licensed contractors in the reporting period.

The actual amounts of different types of waste generated by the activities of construction works at Lyric Theatre Complex (L1 and L2 Contract) in the reporting month are shown in Appendix I.

4.3 Status of Environmental Licenses and Permits

The environmental permits, licenses, and/or notifications on environmental protection for this Project which were valid during the period are summarised in Table 4.4 and Table 4.5 and Table 4.6.

4.3.1 M+ Museum

Table 4.4: Status of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for M+ Museum

Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No.	Valid Period		Status	Remarks
Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No.			Status	Remarks
	From	To
Chemical Waste Producer Registration
WPN5213-217-G2347-53	04-Oct-18	--	Valid	--
Billing Account Construction Waste Disposal
7031993	03-Oct-18	--	Account Active	--
Construction Noise Permit
GW-RE0973-19	10-Dec-19	26-May-20	Valid
Wastewater Discharge License
WT-00033363-2019	21-Mar-19	31-Mar-24	Valid	--
WT-00035338-2019	20-Jan-20	31-Jan-25	Valid	--
Notification under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation
437339	12-Sep-18	--	Notified	--

4.3.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Table 4.5: Status of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for L1

Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No.	Valid Period		Status	Remarks
Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No.			Status	Remarks
	From	To
Chemical Waste Producer Registration
WPN5213-217-G2347-39	17-Feb-16	--	Valid	--
Billing Account Construction Waste Disposal
7029925	22-Jan-18	--	Account Active	--
Construction Noise Permit
GW-RE0109-20	4-Mar-20	3-May-20	Valid	--
Wastewater Discharge License
WT-00030694-2018	11-Apr-18	30-Apr-23	Valid	--
Notification under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation
429708	16-Jan-18	--	Notified	--

Table 4.6: Status of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for L2

Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No.	Valid Period		Status	Remarks
Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No.			Status	Remarks
	From	To
Chemical Waste Producer Registration
WPN5213-217-G2347-39	17-Feb-16	--	Valid	This license/permit is share with L1
Billing Account Construction Waste Disposal
7032787	02-Jan-19	--	Account Active	--
Construction Noise Permit
GW-RE0109-20	4-Mar-20	3-May-20	Valid	This license/permit is share with L1
Wastewater Discharge License
WT-00030694-2018	11-Apr-18	30-Apr-23	Valid	This license/permit is share with L1
Notification under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation
448474	27-Aug-19	--	Notified	--

4.4 Recommended Mitigation Measures

The EM&A programme followed the recommended mitigation measures in the EM&A Manual. The EM&A requirements as well as the summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix J. In particular, the following mitigation measures were brought to attention during the site inspections:

4.4.1 M+ Museum

Air Quality

– Increase water spraying frequency to dusty road to avoid dust impact.

– Any stockpiles/debris should be covered by impervious sheeting.

Noise

– Noise insulating fabric should be adopted for certain PME to reduce noise emission.

4.4.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Water Quality

– All drainage facilities should be properly maintained to adequately control site discharges.

Air Quality

– Increase water spraying frequency to dusty road to avoid dust impact.

– Any stockpiles/debris should be covered by impervious sheeting.

Waste Management

– Drip trays should be provided for chemical containers.

– Oil leakage should be cleared and handled as chemical waste.

– Container used for storage chemicals should be maintained in good condition and properly labelled.

– No observations

5 Compliance with Environmental Permit

The status of the required submission under the EP during the reporting period is summarized in Table 5.1.

Table 5.1: Status of Submissions under the Environmental Permit

EP Condition	Submission	Submission Date
Condition 3.4	Monthly EM&A Report for March 2020	14 April 2020

6 Report in Non-compliance, Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

6.1 Record on Non-compliance of Action and Limit Levels

There was no breach of Action or Limit Levels for Air Quality and Noise monitoring in the reporting month.

6.2 Record on Environmental Complaints Received

One environmental complaint was received in the reporting month.

A letter from EPD dated 23 April 2020 regarded delivered trucks at L1 construction site at West Kowloon Cultural District were washed for wheels only not for whole truck body with concrete/ soil residue remaining on truck surface after leaving the site, which might drip onto the road surface outside the site.

After the investigation, it was considered that proper mitigation measures for the vehicle wheel washing had been provided by the contractor and the potential sources of air and water nuisances from the site were minimized by proper mitigation measures. In conclusion, the air and water nuisances in this case were considered to be not project related. However, the mitigation measures should be reviewed daily during construction.

The cumulative statistics on complaints were provided in Appendix K.

6.3 Record on Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecution

No notifications of summons or successful prosecutions were received this month. The cumulative statistics on notifications of summons and successful prosecutions were provided in Appendix K.

7 Future Key Issues

7.1 Construction Works for the Coming Month(s)

7.1.1 M+ Museum

The major site works for M+ Museum scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

● Structure

– M+ Podium: Structural works completed

– CSF RF: Structural works completed

– RDE RF: Structural works completed

● MEP

– BEL, BLT, ELV, BFS, BPD, BME works from B2 to 16/F of M+

– BEL, BLT, ELV, BFS, BPD, BME works from G/F to 15/F of RDE

– MEP works at CSF building majority finished

– T&C for M+ / CSF

● ABWF

– M+ B2F – 3/F Basement & Podium, Screeding, wall plastering, finishing & Paving works, installation of fire shutter, toilets / sanitary fitment installation, make good & finishes works

– M+ Tower - paint/sealer, plaster, toilets / sanitary fitment installation, make good & finishes works

– CSF – majority ABWF works at CSF accomplished, make good & defect rectification

– RDE up to 15/F – blockwall, plastering, Artwall/drywall stud erection, False ceiling sub-frame installation, paving & flooring works

● Other

– M+ G/F – Paving works

– M+ 3F Podium Roof – landscaping works (soil mix), drainage mat / cable installation

– Paving works at M+ 1/F, G/F

7.1.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

The major site works for L1 scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

● Excavation work at Main Cofferdam

● Drainage work (PIW works)

● Extended basement structure construction of Area 06 and Main Cofferdam

The major site works for L2 scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

● Visual Mock Up

– VMU interior work

● LTC construction

– B2, B2U/F, B1L/F, B1, B1M and L00 construction

– Falsework and Formwork Erection

– Reinforcement work

– Concrete work

● Extended Basement

– BS installation (south B2)

● DSC Cofferdam A

– DCS Cofferdam A – Section 2

● Remaining Works for M+ Promenade

● Modification to Existing Pump Cell

– Reprovision of Sea Water Pump Cell

– Modification of Existing Pump Cell, & Connection to New Pump Cell

7.2 Key Issues for the Coming Month

7.2.1 M+ Museum

Key issues to be considered in the coming month include:

● Generation of dust from construction works;

● Noise impact from operating equipment and machinery on-site;

● Generation of site surface runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;

● Management of stockpiles and slopes, particularly on rainy days;

● Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste; and

● Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site.

7.2.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Key issues to be considered in the coming month include:

● Generation of dust from construction works;

● Noise impact from operating equipment and machinery on-site;

● Generation of site surface runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;

● Management of stockpiles and slopes, particularly on rainy days;

● Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste; and

● Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site.

7.3 Monitoring Schedule for the Coming Month

The environmental site inspection and environmental monitoring will be continued in the coming month. Impact monitoring for air quality and noise in accordance with the approved EM&A Manual has commenced since 31 October 2015 and 5 March 2016 respectively. The tentative monitoring schedule for the coming month is shown in the Appendix E.

8 Conclusions and Recommendations

8.1 Conclusions

The EM&A programme as recommended in the EM&A Manual has been undertaken since the construction of M+ Museum main works commenced on 31 October 2015, and the construction of Lyric Theatre Complex commenced on 1 March 2016.

Monitoring of air quality and noise with respect to the Projects is underway. In particular, the 1-hour TSP, 24-hour TSP, noise level (as L_eq, 30 minutes) under monitoring have been checked against established Action and Limit levels. There was no breach of Action and Limit Levels for 1-hour TSP, 24-hour TSP and noise in the reporting month.

One environmental complaint was recorded in the reporting month. No notifications of summons or successful prosecutions were received during the reporting month.

Weekly construction phase site inspections and bi-weekly landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted during the reporting month as required. It was observed that the Contractors had implemented all possible and feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the potential environmental impacts during construction phase works.

8.2 Recommendations

Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities, including air quality, noise, water quality, waste, landscape and visual, will be monitored or reviewed. The recommended environmental mitigation measures shall be implemented on site and regular inspections as required will be carried out to ensure that the environmental conditions are acceptable.