Contents
Executive Summary
Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Limited (MMHK) was commissioned to undertake the Environmental Team (ET) services (including environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A)) for the construction of M+ Museum Main Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/022) and Lyric Theatre Complex Foundation Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/014) at West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD) (The Project) as part of the WKCD development. The Project Proponent is the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority (WKCDA). The construction works and EM&A programme for M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex commenced on 31 October 2015 and 1 March 2016 respectively.
The overall works for the WKCD fall under two separate categories of Designated Project (DP) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), namely an “engineering feasibility study of urban development projects with a study area covering more than 20 ha or involving a total population of more than 100 000” (Item 3 of Schedule 3) and “an underpass more than 100m in length under the built areas” (Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2). An Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/B (EP) was issued with respect to the “Underpass Road and Austin Road Flyover Serving the West Kowloon Cultural District” which specifically includes the abovementioned category of DP under Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO.
This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works at both the main works of M+ Museum and foundation works of Lyric Theatre Complex conducted from 1 August to 31 August 2017.
Exceedance of Action and Limit Levels
There was no breach of Action or Limit levels for Air Quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and Noise in this reporting month.
Implementation of Mitigation Measures
Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 3, 10, 17, 24 and 31 August 2017 for M+ Museum and 2, 9, 16, 25 and 30 August 2017 for Lyric Theatre Complex to confirm the implementation measures undertaken by the Contractors in the reporting month The outcomes are presented in Section 4 and the status of implementation of mitigation measures in the site is shown in Appendix J.
Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the abovementioned weekly site inspections during the reporting month. No adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.
EPD site inspection with Contractor was conducted on 18 August 2017 at M+ Museum. No adverse comment was recorded.
EPD site inspection with Contractor was conducted on 25 August 2017 at Lyric Theatre Complex. No adverse comment was received.
Record of Complaints
No environmental complaints were recorded in the reporting month.
Record of Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
No notification of summons and successful prosecution were recorded in the reporting month.
Future Key Issues
The major site works at M+ Museum scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:
● Construction of 3/F, 2/F, 1M/F, 1/F, G/F and LG/F;
● Construction of column from LGF to GF, G/F to 1/F, 1/F to 1M/F, 1M/F to 2/F, 2/F to 3/F;
● Encasement of Mega Trusses;
● ABWF work at DCS;
● E&M work at B2/F and SPS;
● Construction of B1 slab and beam and Roof Beam and slab at ICP
● Sheet Pile Installation for seawater outfall pipe between Ch0+66 to Ch0+108
● Storm Drainage at Portion M45
● Sewerage work at Portion L08
● West core wall up to 4/F
The major site works at Lyric Theatre Complex scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:
● Bulk Excavation
● Preparation works for ELS
● Steel Struct ELS Installation
● Pre-grouting adjacent to Seawall
Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities, including air quality, noise, water quality, waste, landscape and visual, will be monitored or reviewed. The recommended environmental mitigation measures shall be implemented on site and regular inspections as required will be carried out to ensure that the environmental conditions are acceptable.
Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Limited (MMHK) was commissioned to undertake the Environmental Team (ET) services (including environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A)) for the construction of M+ Museum Main Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/022) and Lyric Theatre Complex Foundation Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/014) at West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD) (The Project) as part of the WKCD development. The Project Proponent is the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority (WKCDA). The construction works and EM&A programme for M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex commenced on 31 October 2015 and 1 March 2016 respectively.
The overall works for the WKCD fall under two separate categories of Designated Project (DP) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), namely an “engineering feasibility study of urban development projects with a study area covering more than 20 ha or involving a total population of more than 100 000” (Item 3 of Schedule 3) and “an underpass more than 100m in length under the built areas” (Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2). An Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/B (EP) was issued with respect to the “Underpass Road and Austin Road Flyover Serving the West Kowloon Cultural District” which specifically includes the abovementioned category of DP under Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO. The captioned projects include part of the abovementioned underpass road located within the site boundary also falls under this same category.
The M+ museum development aims to provide an iconic presence for the M+ museum, semi-transparent vertical plane, housing education facilities, a public restaurant and museum offices. At ground and lower levels, generous access will be provided to the park and other West Kowloon Cultural District facilities, alongside a public resource centre, theatres, retail and dining, and back-of-house functions.
The 1,200-seat Lyric Theatre Complex will be Hong Kong’s first world-class facility for dance performances, including ballet, contemporary and Chinese dance forms. In the run up to the opening of further major performing arts venues in the WKCD, it will also be used for a wide variety of performing arts events including drama, opera and musical performances. The Lyric Theatre Complex will act as a platform for Hong Kong’s leading arts organisations, and be a new major venue to show programmes from Asia and worldwide.
The Monthly EM&A Report is prepared in accordance with the Condition 3.4 of the Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/B. This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works at both the main works of M+ Museum and foundation works of Lyric Theatre Complex conducted from 1 August to 31 August 2017. The purpose of this report is to summarise the findings in the EM&A of the project over the reporting period.
The organisation chart and lines of communication with respect to the on-site environmental management structure together with the contact information of the key personnel are shown in Appendix A.
During the reporting period, construction works at M+ Museum undertaken include:
● Construction of 3/F, 2/F, 1M/F, 1/F, G/F, LG/F, B1 slab;
● Construction of column from B1 to LGF, LGF to GF, G/F to 1/F, 1/F to 1M/F, 1M/F to 2/F, 2/F to 3/F;
● Installation and encasement of Mega Trusses;
● ABWF work at DCS;
● E&M work at B2/F and SPS;
● Construction of B1 slab and beam and Roof Beam and slab at ICP
● Tam Grouting of dewatering wells
● Sheet Pile Installation for seawater outfall pipe between Ch0+66 to Ch0+108
● Storm Drainage at Portion M45
● Sewerage work at Portion L08
● West core wall up to 4/F
● East core wall up to 4/F
During the reporting period, construction works at Lyric Theatre Complex undertaken include:
● Pumping Test
● Bulk Excavation
● Preparation works for ELS
● Steel Struct ELS Installation
● Pre-grouting adjacent to Seawall
The Construction Works Programmes of M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex are provided in Appendix B. A layout plan of the Project is provided in Figure 1. Please refer to Table 4.3 on the status of the environmental licenses.
The EM&A programme requires environmental monitoring of air quality, noise, landscape and visual as specified in the approved EM&A Manual.
A summary of impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1: Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
Parameters |
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Air Quality |
24-Hour TSP |
AM1 - International Commerce Centre |
At least once every 6 days |
1-Hour TSP |
AM1 - International Commerce Centre |
At least 3 times every 6 days |
|
24-Hour TSP |
AM2A – Austin Road West opposite to The Harbourside Tower 1 |
At least once every 6 days |
|
1-Hour TSP |
AM2A – Austin Road West opposite to The Harbourside Tower 1 |
At least 3 times every 6 days |
|
Noise |
Leq, 30 minutes |
NM1A- Podium level of The Harbourside Tower 1 |
Weekly |
Landscape & Visual |
Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation measures during the construction stage |
As described in Table 9.1 and 9.2 of the EM&A Manual |
Bi-weekly |
Given that the Project covers only a small part of the whole WKCD area (i.e. M+ Museum, Lyric Theatre Complex and respective portions of underpass road), it was proposed that the EM&A programme for the Project should only require 1 noise monitoring station and 2 air quality monitoring stations located closest to the Project area. Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring stations AM1, AM2 and NM1 were set up. Other monitoring locations are too far away (i.e. AM3 to AM5 and NM2 to NM5) are not included in this EM&A programme until the construction of the corresponding area commences.
The Harbourside management office formally rejected our proposal of setting up air quality and noise monitoring equipment on its premises at the podium level of Tower 1 (AM2/NM1) on 10 November 2015. Alternative noise monitoring location was identified at The Arch (NM2), however The Arch management office formally rejected our proposal of setting up noise monitoring equipment on its premises on 23 November 2015. Nevertheless, suitable air quality monitoring location at AM2 was identified on the ground floor in front of The Harbourside Tower 1, which is at the same location as that of baseline monitoring for consistency. No management approval is required at the ground floor for conducting the air monitoring. However, the electricity supply at AM2 was suspended from 31 August 2016 and was no longer available. In order to have a more secure electricity supply, an alternative air monitoring location (AM2A) was identified at Austin Road West opposite to The Harbourside Tower 1, which is close to Lyric Theatre Complex site entrance. This alternative air monitoring location was approved by EPD on 28 September 2016. Noise monitoring at G/F of Harbourside will not be representative. Approval from the management office of the International Commerce Centre has been granted on 29 February 2016 for conducting noise monitoring at the alternative noise monitoring location identified at the podium floor (NM1A) which is free from screening to the construction activities. Therefore, 2 air quality monitoring stations and 1 noise impact monitoring station were confirmed for the impact monitoring.
The Environmental Quality Performance Limits for air quality and noise are shown in Appendix C.
The Event and Action Plan for air quality, construction noise. landscape and visual are shown in Appendix D.
The EM&A programme followed the recommended mitigation measures in the EM&A Manual. The EM&A requirements as well as the summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix J.
For air quality and noise, the monitoring methodology, including the monitoring locations, monitoring equipment used, monitoring parameters, and frequency and duration etc., for air quality and noise are detailed in this Section. The environmental monitoring schedules for the reporting period and the tentative monitoring Schedule for the coming month are provided in Appendix E.
For landscape and audit impact, the relevant EM&A monitoring requirements and details are also presented in this Section.
Table 2.1 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of the TSP monitoring.
Table 2.1: Air Quality Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Parameter |
Frequency |
Duration |
24-hour TSP |
At least once in every six-days |
24 hours |
1-hour TSP |
At least 3 times every six-days |
60 minutes |
Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring stations AM1 and AM2A were set up at the proposed locations in accordance with updated EM&A Manual. Location of the monitoring station is given in Table 2.2 and shown in Figure 1.
Table 2.2: Air Quality Monitoring Station
Monitoring Station |
Location |
AM1 |
International Commerce Centre (ICC) |
AM2A |
Austin Road West opposite to The Harbourside Tower 1 |
Continuous 24-hour TSP air quality monitoring was conducted using High Volume Sampler (HVS) (Model: TE-5170) located at the designated monitoring station. The HVS meets all the requirements stated in of the EM&A Manual. Portable direct reading dust meter was used to carry out the 1-hour TSP monitoring. Table 2.3 summarizes the equipment used in the impact air quality monitoring. Copies of the calibration certificates for the HVS, calibration kit and portable dust meters are attached in Appendix F.
Table 2.3: TSP Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
24-hour TSP monitoring |
|
High Volume Sampler |
TE-5170 (Serial No.: 0767 and 8919) |
Calibrator |
TE-5025A (Orifice I.D.: 2454) |
1-hour TSP monitoring |
|
Portable direct reading dust meter |
Sibata LD-3B (Serial No.: 276020 and 2Z6240) |
Calibration of the HVS (five point calibration) using Calibration Kit was carried out every two months. The HVS calibration orifice will be calibrated annually. Calibration certificate of the TE-5025A Calibration Kit and the HVS are provided in Appendix F.
The 1-hour TSP monitoring should be determined periodically (e.g. annually) by the HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method.
24-hour TSP Monitoring
Installation
The HVS was installed at the site boundary. The following criteria were considered in the installation of the HVS.
– A horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the sampler against gusty wind was provided.
– The distance between the HVS and any obstacles, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the HVS.
– A minimum of 2 metres separation from walls, parapets and penthouse was required for rooftop sampler.
– A minimum of 2 metres separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally was required.
– No furnace or incinerator flues or building vent were nearby.
– Airflow around the sampler was unrestricted.
– The sampler has been more than 20 metres from any drip line.
– Permission was obtained to set up the sampler and to obtain access to the monitoring station.
– A secured supply of electricity is needed to operate the sampler.
Preparation of Filter Papers
– Glass fibre filters were labelled and sufficient filters that were clean and without pinholes were selected.
– The filters used are specified to have a minimum collection efficiency of 99 percent for 0.3 µm (DOP) particles.
– All filters were equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing. The conditioning environment temperature was around 25 °C and not variable by more than ±3 °C with relative humidity (RH) < 50% and was not variable by more than ±5 %. A convenient working RH was 40%. All preparation of filters was done by Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory.
Field Monitoring Procedures
– The power supply was checked to ensure the HVS works properly.
– The filter holder and the area surrounding the filter were cleaned.
– The filter holder was removed by loosening the four bolts and a new filter, with stamped number upward, on a supporting screen was aligned carefully.
– The filter was properly aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter.
– The swing bolts were fastened to hold the filter holder down to the frame. The pressure applied should be sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.
– The shelter lid was closed and was secured with the aluminium strip.
– The HVS was warmed-up for about 5 minutes to establish run-temperature conditions.
– A new flow rate record sheet was set into the flow recorder.
– The flow rate of the HVS was checked and adjusted at around 1.3 m3/min. The range specified in the EM&A Manual was between 0.6-1.7 m3/min.
– The programmable timer was set for a sampling period of 24 hours, and the starting time, weather condition and the filter number were recorded.
– The initial elapsed time was recorded.
– At the end of sampling, the sampled filter was removed carefully and folded in half length so that only surfaces with collected particulate matter were in contact.
– It was then placed in a clean plastic envelope and sealed.
– All monitoring information was recorded on a standard data sheet.
– Filters were sent to a Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory for analysis.
Maintenance and Calibration
– The HVS and its accessories are maintained in good working condition, such as replacing motor brushes routinely and checking electrical wiring to ensure a continuous power supply.
– HVSs were calibrated upon installation and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals. The calibration kits were calibrated annually.
– Calibration records for HVS and calibration kit are shown in Appendix F.
1-hour TSP Monitoring
Field Monitoring
The measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:
– Turn the power on.
– Close the air collecting opening cover.
– Push the “TIME SETTING” switch to [BG].
– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform background measurement for 6 seconds.
– Turn the knob at SENSI ADJ position to insert the light scattering plate.
– Leave the equipment for 1 minute upon “SPAN CHECK” is indicated in the display.
– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform automatic sensitivity adjustment. This measurement takes 1 minute.
– Pull out the knob and return it to MEASURE position.
– Setting time period of 1 hour for the 1-hour TSP measurement.
– Push “START/STOP” to start the 1-hour TSP measurement.
– Regular checking of the time period setting to ensure monitoring time of 1 hour.
Maintenance and Calibration
– The 1-hour dust meter would be checked at 3-month intervals and calibrated at 1-year intervals throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.
– Calibration records for direct dust meters are shown in Appendix F.
Weather Condition
– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.
Table 2.4 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of noise monitoring. The noise in A-weighted levels Leq, L10 and L90 are recorded in a 30-minute interval between 0700 and 1900 hours.
Table 2.4: Noise Monitoring Parameters, Period and Frequency
Time Period |
Parameters |
Frequency |
Daytime on normal weekdays (0700-1900 hours) |
Leq(30 min), L90(30 min) & L10 (30 min) |
Once every week |
Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring station NM1A was set up at the proposed location in accordance with updated EM&A Manual. Location of the monitoring station is given in Table 2.5 and shown in Figure 1.
Table 2.5: Noise Monitoring Station
Monitoring Station |
Location |
NM1A |
Podium floor of International Commerce Centre (ICC) |
Integrating Sound Level Meter was used for noise monitoring. It was a Type 1 sound level meter capable of giving a continuous readout of the noise level readings including equivalent continuous sound pressure level (LAeq) and percentile sound pressure level (Lx). They comply with International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1). Table 2.6 summarizes the noise monitoring equipment model being used.
Table 2.6: Noise Monitoring Equipments
Monitoring Station |
Equipment Model |
|
Integrating Sound Level Meter |
Calibrator |
|
NM1A |
Rion NL-52 (Serial No.00131627) |
Rion NC-73 (Serial No.10486660) |
Field Monitoring
– The microphone of the Sound Level Meter was set at least 1.2 m above the ground.
– Free Field measurement was made at the monitoring locations.
– The battery condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.
– Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:
- frequency weighting: A
- time weighting: Fast
- time measurement: 30 minutes intervals (between 0700-1900 on normal weekdays)
– Prior to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for 94 dB at 1 kHz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement was more than 1 dB, the measurement would be considered invalid and has to be repeated after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.
– During the monitoring period, the Leq, L10 and L90 were recorded. In addition, any site observations and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.
– A correction of +3dB(A) was made to the free field measurements.
Maintenance and Calibration
– The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator is cleaned with soft cloth at quarterly intervals.
– The sound level meter and calibrator are sent to the supplier or HOKLAS laboratory to check and calibrate at yearly intervals.
– Calibration records are shown in Appendix F.
Weather Condition
– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.
Table 2.7 details the monitoring program (as proposed in the WKCD EIA report) for landscape and visual impact during the construction phase.
Table 2.7: Monitoring Program for Landscape and Visual Impact during Construction Phase
Stage |
Monitoring Task |
Frequency |
Report |
Approval |
Construction |
Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation measures during the construction stage. |
Bi-weekly |
ET to report on Contractor’s compliance |
Counter-signed by IEC |
During the landscape and visual impact monitoring, any changes in relation to the landscape and visual amenity should be monitored with reference to the baseline conditions of the site. In addition, mitigation measures were proposed in the WKCD EIA report to minimise the landscape and visual impacts during the construction phase. The proposed mitigation measures as shown in Table 9.1 and Table 9.2 of the EM&A Manual should be checked for proper implementation.
Construction impact monitoring for air quality, noise and landscape and visual impact was undertaken in compliance with the EM&A Manual during the reporting month.
Results of 1-hour TSP at the monitoring location AM1 and AM2A are summarised in Table 3.1. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.
Table 3.1: Summary of 1-hour TSP monitoring results
|
|
|
1-hour TSP (μg/m3) |
|
|
|
|
||
Monitoring Station |
Monitoring Date |
Start Time |
Range (μg/m3) |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level (μg/m3) |
|
|||
1st Result |
2nd Result |
3rd Result |
|
||||||
AM1 |
02-Aug-17 |
10:42 |
39 |
49 |
41 |
39-91 |
273.7 |
500 |
|
08-Aug-17 |
10:50 |
49 |
52 |
55 |
|
||||
14-Aug-17 |
10:40 |
56 |
51 |
50 |
|
||||
18-Aug-17 |
8:02 |
59 |
64 |
69 |
|
||||
24-Aug-17 |
10:40 |
72 |
82 |
91 |
|
||||
30-Aug-17 |
10:38 |
48 |
62 |
55 |
|
||||
AM2A |
02-Aug-17 |
10:54 |
47 |
58 |
46 |
44-99 |
274.2 |
500 |
|
08-Aug-17 |
11:02 |
44 |
53 |
60 |
|
||||
14-Aug-17 |
10:52 |
59 |
54 |
52 |
|
||||
18-Aug-17 |
8:14 |
65 |
72 |
61 |
|
||||
24-Aug-17 |
10:54 |
78 |
90 |
99 |
|
||||
30-Aug-17 |
10:52 |
71 |
59 |
66 |
|
Results of 24-hour TSP at the monitoring location AM1 and AM2A are summarised in Table 3.2. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.
Table 3.2: Summary of 24-hour TSP monitoring results
Monitoring Station |
Monitoring Date |
Start Time |
Monitoring Results (μg/m3) |
Range (μg/m3) |
Action Level (μg/m3) |
Limit Level (μg/m3) |
AM1
|
02-Aug-17 |
10:40 |
26 |
26-49 |
143.6 |
260 |
08-Aug-17 |
10:48 |
33 |
||||
14-Aug-17 |
10:38 |
49 |
||||
18-Aug-17 |
08:00 |
46 |
||||
24-Aug-17 |
10:42 |
40 |
||||
30-Aug-17 |
10:40 |
36 |
||||
AM2A |
02-Aug-17 |
10:52 |
41 |
35-49 |
151.1 |
260 |
08-Aug-17 |
11:00 |
35 |
||||
14-Aug-17 |
10:50 |
45 |
||||
18-Aug-17 |
08:12 |
42 |
||||
24-Aug-17 |
10:52 |
49 |
||||
30-Aug-17 |
10:50 |
45 |
No exceedance of 1-hour and 24-hour TSP (Action or Limit Level) was recorded in the reporting period.
The construction noise monitoring results at the monitoring location NM1A are summarized in Table 3.3. Graphical plots of the monitoring data and the station set-up of a free-field measurement are shown in Appendix G.
Table 3.3: Summary of noise monitoring results during normal weekdays
Monitoring Date |
Start Time |
End Time |
Leq (30 mins), dB(A) |
Limit Level for Leq (dB(A)) |
02-Aug-17 |
16:00 |
16:30 |
69 |
75 |
08-Aug-17 |
14:00 |
14:30 |
68 |
|
14-Aug-17 |
14:00 |
14:30 |
69 |
|
24-Aug-17 |
14:00 |
14:30 |
69 |
|
30-Aug-17 |
14:00 |
14:30 |
69 |
Remarks: +3dB (A) correction was applied to free-field measurement. |
No exceedance (Action/Limit Level) of construction noise was recorded in the reporting period as no noise related environmental complaint was received during the reporting period and noise levels recorded during the monitoring period were below 75 dB(A).
Construction works were extended to holidays on 6, 13 and 20 August 2017. In accordance with the EM&A Manual, additional monitoring was carried out during the restricted hours on 6, 13 and 20 August 2017. The Leq (5 mins) is in the range of 67-69 dB(A). Major noise source includes traffic. Construction Noise Permits for the works carried out during restricted hours were obtained and listed in Table 4.3.
Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the weekly site inspections on 3, 17 and 31 August 2017 for M+ Museum and 2, 16 and 30 August 2017 for Lyric Theatre Complex during the reporting month. As reviewed by the registered Landscape Architect, no adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.
The landscape and visual mitigation measures were implemented during the reporting period. The summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix J.
Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 3, 10, 17, 24 and 31 August 2017. The joint site inspection with IEC, ET, ER and Contractor was held on 17 August 2017. All observations have been recorded in the site inspection checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate recommended mitigation measures where necessary. The key observations from the site inspections and associated recommendations are summarized in Table 4.1.
EPD site inspection was conducted on 18 August 2017. Some general reminders were given including maintaining of the temporary drainage system in good condition on site; adequate water spraying should be maintained for the haul roads due to sunny and dry weather; and works during restricted hours shall be conducted in compliance with the condition of the valid Construction Noise Permit and Noise Control Ordinance. No adverse comment was recorded.
Table 4.1: Summary of Site Inspections and Recommendations for M+ Museum
Inspection Date |
Parameter |
Observation / Recommendation |
Contactor’s Responses / Action(s) Undertaken |
Close-out (Date) |
30 Jun 2017 |
Water quality |
The contractor was reminded to provide pits and 4” pumps near the seafront. |
On 6 Jul, the contractor has still not provided 4” pumps and pits near seafront. The contractor was reminded to rectify it as soon as possible.
On 13 Jul, insufficient pits were observed near the seafront and 4” pumps were still not yet provided. The contractor was reminded to provide more pits and 4” pumps as prevention measures against rainstorm events.
On 20 Jul, the contractor has still not yet provided the 4” pumps and pits. The contractor was reminded to provide them as soon as possible.
On 27 Jul, one 4” pump and pit were provided. The contractor was reminded to replace the other two 2” pumps with 4” pumps.
On 3 Aug, it is noted that under the hoisting of red rainstorm this morning, the existing pump arrangement, together with earth bund and pit in place, has enough capacity to handle the site runoff without any overflow of runoff. It is therefore considered that the replacing of 2” pumps by 4” pumps are not necessary. |
3 Aug 2017 |
30 Jun 2017 |
Water quality |
As requested by EPD, the contractor is required to further enhance the bund at the seafront as it is considered not high enough. According to site observation, the contractor has not enhanced the bund yet. The contractor was reminded to provide a higher bund near the seafront. |
On 6 Jul, bund at seashore has not been enhanced yet. The contractor was reminded to provide a higher bund as soon as possible.
On 13 Jul, some parts of the bund were enhanced. The contractor was reminded to provide a higher bund for the remaining parts.
On 20 Jul, the contractor has made the bund higher using sand bags and they are finishing off the bund with a layer of cement.
On 27 Jul, the contractor has finished off most parts of the bund with a layer of cement. The contractor was reminded to finish off the remaining parts of the bund with a layer of cement.
On 3 Aug, parts of the bund at seafront were still not yet finished off with a layer of cement. The contractor was reminded to follow up this as soon as possible.
On 10 Aug, the contractor has finished off the remaining part of the bund near the seafront with a layer of cement. |
10 Aug 2017 |
20 Jul 2017 |
Water quality |
The contractor was reminded to provide an updated drainage layout plan to clearly indicate the drainage arrangement of the site. |
On 27 Jul, the contractor was reminded to provide an updated drainage layout plan once available.
On 3 Aug, the contractor was reminded to provide an updated drainage layout plan as soon as possible.
On 10 Aug, the contractor was reminded again to update the drainage layout plan as soon as possible and provide markings on the pipes for easy checking.
On 17 Aug, the contractor has provided an updated drainage plan. However, pipes were not yet marked to indicate the pipe flow. The contractor was reminded to provide proper markings on the pipe.
The contractor is aware of the pipe flow and drainage arrangement of the site, so markings on the pipe are deemed not necessary. |
24 Aug 2017 |
27 Jul 2017 |
Air quality |
Cement bags at various area at B2 were found uncovered. The contractor was reminded to cover them with impervious sheeting to reduce dust impact or remove them off site. |
The contractor has either covered the cement bags with impervious sheeting or removed them off site. |
3 Aug 2017 |
27 Jul 2017 |
Waste management |
Chemicals without drip tray were found at B2. The contractor was reminded to provide drip tray for the chemicals or remove them off site. |
The contractor has removed the chemicals off site. |
3 Aug 2017 |
3 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
No wheel-washing was observed at the site entrances. The contractor was reminded to arrange workers for wheel-washing at Gate 1 and 3. |
On 10 Aug, Gates 1 and 3 were still observed without wheel-washing workers. The contractor was reminded to provide workers for wheel-washing all the time at site entrances.
On 11 Aug, the contractor has provided workers for wheel-washing at Gates 1 and 3. |
11 Aug 2017 |
3 Aug 2017 |
Waste management |
Mixture of chemical wastes were found in drip trays of two air compressors. The contractor was reminded to clean up the drip trays regularly. |
On 10 Aug, mixture of chemical wastes were still observed at the drip trays of the air compressors. The contractor was reminded to rectify it as soon as possible.
On 16 Aug, the contractor has cleaned the drip tray of one of the air compressors and the other air compressor has been removed off site. |
16 Aug 2017 |
3 Aug 2017 |
Waste management |
Chemical drum was observed without drip tray. The contractor was reminded to provide drip tray for the chemical drum. |
On 10 Aug, chemical drums were still found without drip trays. The contractor was reminded to rectify it.
On 14 Aug, the contractor has provided drip tray for the chemical drums
|
14 Aug 2017 |
3 Aug 2017 |
Water Quality |
Effluent quality at ICP sampling point was checked. They were found visually clear when comparing with standard solution and within proper pH range. The contractor was reminded to provide a set of sampling bottles at wetsep no.5 for water sampling. |
A set of sampling bottles was provided at wetsep no.5. |
10 Aug 2017 |
10 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
Grouting station was observed without proper enclosure at B2. The contractor was reminded to properly enclose the station to reduce dust impact. |
Grouting station has been removed off site. |
15 Aug 2017 |
10 Aug 2017 |
Waste management |
Refuse and stagnant water were observed at B2. The contractor was reminded to maintain proper housekeeping and clear the refuse and stagnant water. |
The contractor has removed the refuse and stagnant water at B2. |
12 Aug 2017 |
10 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
Generator and mobile crane were found without NRMM labels and there was also no QPME label for the generator. The contractor was reminded to provide the labels for the plants. |
The contractor has provided proper labels for the plants. |
14 Aug 2017 |
10 Aug 2017 |
Waste management |
Oil mixture was observed at the drip tray of the generator in front of Gate 5. The contractor was reminded to clear it and also plug the dip tray to prevent leakage. |
The contractor has cleaned the drip tray of the generator in front of Gate 5. |
12 Aug 2017 |
10 Aug 2017 |
Water quality |
Effluent quality at ICP sampling point and wetsep no.5 was checked. They were found visually clear and within proper pH range. |
N/A |
N/A |
10 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
Exposed soil was observed in front of Gate 3. The contractor was reminded to clear it to prevent surface runoff and carrying out of the site by vehicles. |
The contractor has paved the area in front of Gate 3. |
14 Aug 2017 |
17 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
The contractor was reminded to provide water spraying during breaking works. |
The contractor has provided water spraying during breaking works. |
21 Aug 2017 |
17 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
The haul road near DCS was observed dry and dusty. The contractor was reminded to enhance water spraying to reduce dust impact. |
The contractor has arranged water spraying to the haul road. |
22 Aug 2017 |
17 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
NRMM label of a breaker was observed weathering. The contractor was reminded to replace the label. |
On 24 Aug, the contractor was reminded to provide NRMM label for the plant as soon as possible.
On 31 Aug, the contractor has not yet provided NRMM label for the machinery, nevertheless they have idled the machinery (not in use).
Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month |
On-going |
17 Aug 2017 |
Waste management |
Chemicals near wetsep no.4 was observed without drip tray. The contractor was reminded to provide drip trays for the chemicals or remove them off site if not in use. |
The contractor has properly stored the chemicals near wetsep no.4. |
22 Aug 2017 |
17 Aug 2017 |
Waste management |
Oil mixture was found in the drip tray. The contractor was reminded to clean the drip tray. |
The contractor has cleaned the oil mixture accumulated in the drip tray. |
22 Aug 2017 |
17 Aug 2017 |
Water quality |
A section of the bund at seafront near DCS was observed not yet finished off with a layer of cement. The contractor was reminded to rectify it. |
The contractor has finished off the section of the bund with a layer of cement. |
22 Aug 2017 |
17 Aug 2017 |
Water quality |
Effluent quality at ICP sampling point and wetsep no.5 was checked. They were found visually clear when comparing with standard solution and within proper pH range. |
N/A |
N/A |
24 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
Cement bags without proper cover were found at RDE B1. The contractor was reminded to cover them with impervious sheeting to reduce dust impact. |
The contractor has covered the cement bags with impervious sheeting. |
25 Aug 2017 |
24 Aug 2017 |
Waste management |
Chemical waste store was found broken. The contractor was reminded to repair it. |
The contractor has repaired the chemical waste store. |
25 Aug 2017 |
24 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
A few mobile machineries were found without NRMM labels, and one of the plant was observed not properly enclosed. An oil drum was also found without drip tray. The contractor was reminded to provide NRMM labels, properly cover the plant and provide drip tray for the oil drum. |
The contractor has provided NRMM label for the machinery and drip tray for the oil drum. The excavator without cover was removed off site. |
29 Aug 2017 |
24 Aug 2017 |
Water quality |
Effluent quality at ICP sampling point and M+ wetsep no.5 was checked. They were visually clear when comparing with standard solution and within proper pH range. |
N/A |
N/A |
31 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
The haul road near DCS was observed dry and dusty. The contractor was reminded to enhance water spraying for dust suppression. |
Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month |
On-going |
31 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
The colour of the NRMM label for the excavator was observed faded. The contractor was reminded to replace the NRMM label. |
Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month |
On-going |
31 Aug 2017 |
Waste management |
The drip tray of the air compressor near seafront was found not large enough. The contractor was reminded to provide a drip tray with proper size. The lubricant next to the sir compressor and oil drum near RDE were found without drip tray. The contractor was reminded to provide drip trays for the lubricant and oil drum. |
Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month |
On-going |
31 Aug 2017 |
Waste management |
Construction waste was found accumulated at B1. The contractor was reminded to remove the construction waste regularly. |
Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month |
On-going |
31 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
The forklift at RDE B1 was observed without NRMM label. The contractor was reminded to provide NRMM label for the forklift. |
Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month |
On-going |
31 Aug 2017 |
Water quality |
Effluent quality at ICP sampling point and M+ wetsep was checked. They were found visually clear and within proper pH range. |
N/A |
N/A |
Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 2, 9, 16, 25 and 30 August 2017. The joint site inspection with IEC, ET, ER and Contractor was held on 9 August 2017. All observations have been recorded in the site inspection checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate recommended mitigation measures where necessary. The key observations from the site inspections and associated recommendations are summarized in Table 4.2.
EPD site inspection was conducted on 25 August 2017. EPD conducted a general inspection and took photo on discharge points and seafront area. No adverse comments were received.
Table 4.2: Summary of Site Inspections and Recommendations for Lyric Theatre Complex
Inspection Date |
Parameter |
Observation / Recommendation |
Contactor’s Responses / Action(s) Undertaken |
Close-out (Date) |
2 Aug 2017 |
Noise |
The contractor was reminded to provide noise mitigation measure such as noise barrier for the breaker in Area L06 during operation. |
Temporary noise barriers were provided as noise mitigation measures for breaker in Area L06. |
4 Aug 2017 |
2 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
NRMM label or exceptional label was missing at a generator. The contractor was reminded to check and provide suitable label for the construction plant. |
NRMM label for generator in Area L07 was provided. |
4 Aug 2017 |
9 Aug 2017 |
Waste management |
Two drip trays in Area L06/L07 did not appear to be properly plugged. The contractor was asked to ensure proper plugging of the drip trays to contain any adverse chemical leakage. |
Two drip trays in Area L06/L07 were properly plugged / sealed off. |
15 Aug 2017 |
9 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
The colour of a NRMM label for a generator in Area L07 had faded. The contractor was asked to provide a new NRMM label showing the correct colour. |
The NRMM label for a generator in Area L07 was reprinted and displayed. |
15 Aug 2017 |
9 Aug 2017 |
Water quality |
A C&D material stockpile next to the sea-front was observed. The contractor was asked to implement suitable mitigation measures (e.g. tarpaulin cover) to prevent spillage into the open waters. |
The stockpile next to the sea-front was removed and backfilled with compaction. |
15 Aug 2017 |
16 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
Dry haul road was observed at Area L04. The contractor was reminded to increase water spraying frequency to avoid dust impact. |
Regular spraying of water on concerned haul road was conducted. |
21 Aug 2017 |
25 Aug 2017 |
Air quality |
The contractor was reminded to enclose 3-side and top of the grouting platform to avoid dust impact. |
The grouting platform was enclosed. |
29 Aug 2017 |
30 Aug 2017 |
Noise |
NRMM label was missing at a generator at Area L06. The Contractor was reminded to place the NRMM label on the generator. |
NRMM label was replaced at a generator at Area L06. |
31 Aug 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Contractors have been registered as a chemical waste producer for the Project. Construction and demolition (C&D) material sorting will be carried out on site. A sufficient number of receptacles were available for general refuse collection.
As advised by the Contractor, 36.36 tonnes, 125.95 tonnes and 705.18 tonnes of inert C&D material were disposed of as public fill to Chai Wan Public Fill Barging Point, Tuen Mun Area 38 and Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Public Fill respectively, while 186.9 tonnes of general refuse were disposed of at SENT landfill. 50.9 tonnes of metals, 1.2 tonnes of paper/cardboard packaging, 0 tonne of plastic and 263.0 tonnes of timber were collected by recycling contractors in the reporting month. 0 tonne of inert C&D materials was reused on site. 0 tonne of inert C&D materials were reused in other projects and 364.0 tonnes of inert C&D materials were disposed to sorting facility. 0 tonne of chemical waste was collected by licensed contractors in the reporting period.
The actual amounts of different types of waste generated by the activities of construction works at M+ Museum in the reporting month are shown in Appendix I.
As advised by the Contractor, 1,728.51 and 624.89 tonnes of inert C&D material were disposed of as public fill to Tseung Kwan O Area 137 and Tuen Mun Area 38 respectively, while 4.4 tonnes of general refuse were disposed of at SENT landfill. 0 tonne of metals, 0 tonne of paper/cardboard packaging, 0 tonne of plastic and 0 tonne of timber were collected by recycling contractors in the reporting month. 0 tonne of inert C&D materials was reused on site. 1,377.5 tonnes of inert C&D materials were reused in other projects. 0 tonne of chemical waste was collected by licensed contractors in the reporting period.
The actual amounts of different types of waste generated by the activities of construction works at Lyric Theatre Complex in the reporting month are shown in Appendix I.
The environmental permits, licenses, and/or notifications on environmental protection for this Project which were valid during the period are summarised in Table 4.3 and Table 4.4.
Table 4.3: Status of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for M+ Museum
|
Valid Period |
|
|
|
|
Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No. |
Status |
Remarks |
|
||
From |
To |
|
|||
Chemical Waste Producer Registration |
|
||||
5213-217-H2913-45 |
05-Nov-15 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
|
Billing Account Construction Waste Disposal |
|
||||
7023393 |
13-Oct-15 |
-- |
Account Active |
-- |
|
Construction Noise Permit |
|
||||
GW-RE0348-17 |
4-May 17 |
3-Nov-17 |
Valid |
|
|
Wastewater Discharge License |
|
||||
WT00023633-2016 |
4-Mar-16 |
31-Mar-21 |
Valid |
-- |
|
Notification under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
|
||||
394083 |
7-Oct-15 |
-- |
Notified |
-- |
|
Table 4.4: Status of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for Lyric Theatre Complex
|
Valid Period |
|
|
|
|
Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No. |
Status |
Remarks |
|
||
From |
To |
|
|||
Chemical Waste Producer Registration |
|
||||
5213-217-G2347-39 |
17-Feb-16 |
-- |
Valid |
-- |
|
Billing Account Construction Waste Disposal |
|
||||
7024189 |
25-Jan-16 |
-- |
Account Active |
-- |
|
Construction Noise Permit |
|
||||
GW-RE0214-17 |
20-Mar-17 |
19-Sep-17 |
Valid |
|
|
Wastewater Discharge License |
|
||||
WT00023648-2016 |
24-Jul-17 |
31-Mar-21 |
Valid |
|
|
Notification under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
|
||||
398075 |
18-Jan-16 |
-- |
Notified |
-- |
|
The EM&A programme followed the recommended mitigation measures in the EM&A Manual. The EM&A requirements as well as the summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix J. In particular, the following mitigation measures were brought to attention during the site inspections:
Chemical and Waste Management
– All chemical drum/ containers stored on site should be provided with drip trays of proper size.
– Drip trays should be regularly cleaned up to avoid accumulation of chemical waste.
– Regular removal of refuse/ construction waste on site.
– Chemical waste store should be properly maintained.
Air Quality
– Maintain high standard of housekeeping to prevent emission of fugitive dust.
– Properly enclose grouting station for dust suppression.
– Cement bags should be well covered by impervious sheeting to reduce dust impact.
– Wheel-washing should be provided at site entrances.
– Proper NRMM labels should be displayed on the non-road mobile machineries.
– Site entrances should be properly paved after excavation for dust suppression.
– Provide regular water spraying for haul roads for reducing dust impact.
– Water spraying should be provided for dusty construction activities.
Water Quality
– Preventive measures, such as earth bund, pumps, sand bags, storage pits, should be in place near the seafront area to prevent overflow of any site runoff into the sea in case of rainstorms.
– Water sampling equipment should be provided for water sampling.
Air Quality
– Enhance water spraying for haul roads to reduce dust impact.
– NRMM labels should be provided for non-road mobile machinery.
– Properly enclose grouting station for dust suppression.
Noise
– Noise mitigation measures should be provided to noisy works.
Chemical and Waste Management
– All drip trays should be plugged or sealed to prevent leakage of chemical waste.
Water Quality
– Idled stockpile near seafront should be properly covered with impervious sheeting to prevent spillage into open waters.
The status of the required submission under the EP during the reporting period is summarized in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1: Status of Submissions under the Environmental Permit
EP Condition |
Submission |
Submission Date |
Condition 3.4 |
Monthly EM&A Report for July 2017 |
14 August 2017 |
There was no breach of Action or Limit Levels for Air Quality and Noise monitoring in the reporting month.
No environmental complaints were recorded in the reporting month. The cumulative statistics on complaints were provided in Appendix K.
No notifications of summons or successful prosecution were received this month. The cumulative statistics on notifications of summons and successful prosecutions were provided in Appendix K.
The major site works scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:
● Construction of 3/F, 2/F, 1M/F, 1/F, G/F and LG/F;
● Construction of column from LGF to GF, G/F to 1/F, 1/F to 1M/F, 1M/F to 2/F, 2/F to 3/F;
● Encasement of Mega Trusses;
● ABWF work at DCS;
● E&M work at B2/F and SPS;
● Construction of B1 slab and beam and Roof Beam and slab at ICP
● Sheet Pile Installation for seawater outfall pipe between Ch0+66 to Ch0+108
● Storm Drainage at Portion M45
● Sewerage work at Portion L08
● West core wall up to 4/F
The major site works scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:
● Bulk Excavation
● Preparation works for ELS
● Steel Struct ELS Installation
● Pre-grouting adjacent to Seawall
Key issues to be considered in the coming month include:
● Generation of dust from construction works;
● Noise impact from operating equipment and machinery on-site;
● Generation of site surface runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;
● Management of stockpiles and slopes, particularly on rainy days;
● Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste; and
● Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site.
Key issues to be considered in the coming month include:
● Generation of dust from construction works;
● Noise impact from operating equipment and machinery on-site;
● Generation of site surface runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;
● Management of stockpiles and slopes, particularly on rainy days;
● Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste; and
● Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site.
The environmental site inspection and environmental monitoring will be continued in the coming month. Impact monitoring for air quality and noise in accordance with the approved EM&A Manual has commenced since 31 October 2015 and 5 March 2016 respectively. The tentative monitoring schedule for the coming month is shown in the Appendix E.
The EM&A programme as recommended in the EM&A Manual has been undertaken since the construction of M+ Museum main works commenced on 31 October 2015, and the construction of Lyric Theatre Complex foundation works commenced on 1 March 2016.
Monitoring of air quality and noise with respect to the Projects is underway. In particular, the 1-hour TSP, 24-hour TSP, noise level (as Leq, 30 minutes) under monitoring have been checked against established Action and Limit levels. There was no breach of Action and Limit Levels for 1-hour TSP, 24-hour TSP and noise in the reporting month.
No environmental complaints were recorded in the reporting month. No notifications of summons or successful prosecution were received during the reporting month.
Weekly construction phase site inspections and bi-weekly landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted during the reporting month as required. It was observed that the Contractors had implemented all possible and feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the potential environmental impacts during construction phase works.
Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities, including air quality, noise, water quality, waste, landscape and visual, will be monitored or reviewed. The recommended environmental mitigation measures shall be implemented on site and regular inspections as required will be carried out to ensure that the environmental conditions are acceptable.