Contents

Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 Project Organisation 1.3 Environmental Status in the Reporting Period 1.4 Summary of EM&A Requirements 2 Impact Monitoring Methodology 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Air Quality 2.3 Noise 2.4 Landscape and Visual 3 Monitoring Results 3.1 Impact Monitoring 3.2 Air Quality Monitoring 3.3 Noise Monitoring 3.4 Landscape and Visual Impact 4 Environmental Site Inspection 4.1 Site Inspection 4.2 Advice on the Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status 4.3 Status of Environmental Licenses and Permits 4.4 Recommended Mitigation Measures 5 Compliance with Environmental Permit 6 Report in Non-compliance, Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions 6.1 Record on Non-compliance of Action and Limit Levels 6.2 Record on Environmental Complaints Received 6.3 Record on Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecution 7 Future Key Issues 7.1 Construction Works for the Coming Month(s) 7.2 Key Issues for the Coming Month 7.3 Monitoring Schedule for the Coming Month 8 Conclusions and Recommendations 8.1 Conclusions 8.2 Recommendations Figure 1 Site Layout Plan and Monitoring Stations Appendices A. Project Organisation B. Tentative Construction Programme C. Action and Limit Levels for Construction Phase D. Event and Action Plan for Air Quality, Noise, Landscape and Visual Impact E. Monitoring Schedule F. Calibration Certifications G. Graphical Plots of the Monitoring Results H. Meteorological Data Extracted from Hong Kong Observatory I. Waste Flow table J. Environmental Mitigation Measures – Implementation Status K. Cumulative Statistics on Complaints, Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

Executive Summary

Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Limited (MMHK) was commissioned to undertake the Environmental Team (ET) services (including environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A)) for the construction of M+ Museum Main Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/022) and Lyric Theatre Complex Foundation Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/014) at West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD) (The Project) as part of the WKCD development. The Project Proponent is the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority (WKCDA). The construction works and EM&A programme for M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex commenced on 31 October 2015 and 1 March 2016 respectively.

The overall works for the WKCD fall under two separate categories of Designated Project (DP) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), namely an “engineering feasibility study of urban development projects with a study area covering more than 20 ha or involving a total population of more than 100 000” (Item 3 of Schedule 3) and “an underpass more than 100m in length under the built areas” (Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2). An Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/B (EP) was issued with respect to the “Underpass Road and Austin Road Flyover Serving the West Kowloon Cultural District” which specifically includes the abovementioned category of DP under Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO.

This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works at both the main works of M+ Museum and foundation works of Lyric Theatre Complex conducted from 1 August to 31 August 2016.

Exceedance of Action and Limit Levels

There was no breach of Action or Limit levels for Air Quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and Noise in this reporting month.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures

Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 4, 12, 18 and 25 August 2016 for M+ Museum and 3, 10, 16, 24 and 31 August 2016 for Lyric Theatre Complex to confirm the implementation measures undertaken by the Contractors in the reporting month The outcomes are presented in Section 4 and the status of implementation of mitigation measures in the site is shown in Appendix J.

Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the abovementioned weekly site inspections during the reporting month. No adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.

EPD site inspection with Contractor was conducted on 1, 2 and 18 August 2016 at M+ Museum and the EPD inspectors were satisfied with the quality of effluent.

Record of Complaints

No environmental complaint was recorded in the reporting month.

Record of Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

No notification of summons and successful prosecution were recorded in the reporting month.

Future Key Issues

The major site works at M+ Museum scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

● Excavation

● Construction of pile caps

● Construction of slab

● Construction of columns & walls

The major site works at Lyric Theatre Complex scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

● H-Pile Construction

● Bored Pile Construction

● Excavation and lateral support

Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities, including air quality, noise, water quality, waste, landscape and visual, will be monitored or reviewed. The recommended environmental mitigation measures shall be implemented on site and regular inspections as required will be carried out to ensure that the environmental conditions are acceptable.

# 1 Introduction

## 1.1 Background

Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Limited (MMHK) was commissioned to undertake the Environmental Team (ET) services (including environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A)) for the construction of M+ Museum Main Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/022) and Lyric Theatre Complex Foundation Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/014) at West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD) (The Project) as part of the WKCD development. The Project Proponent is the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority (WKCDA). The construction works and EM&A programme for M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex commenced on 31 October 2015 and 1 March 2016 respectively.

The overall works for the WKCD fall under two separate categories of Designated Project (DP) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), namely an “engineering feasibility study of urban development projects with a study area covering more than 20 ha or involving a total population of more than 100 000” (Item 3 of Schedule 3) and “an underpass more than 100m in length under the built areas” (Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2). An Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/B (EP) was issued with respect to the “Underpass Road and Austin Road Flyover Serving the West Kowloon Cultural District” which specifically includes the abovementioned category of DP under Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO. The captioned projects include part of the abovementioned underpass road located within the site boundary also falls under this same category.

The M+ museum development aims to provide an iconic presence for the M+ museum, semi-transparent vertical plane, housing education facilities, a public restaurant and museum offices. At ground and lower levels, generous access will be provided to the park and other West Kowloon Cultural District facilities, alongside a public resource centre, theatres, retail and dining, and back-of-house functions.

The 1,200-seat Lyric Theatre Complex will be Hong Kong’s first world-class facility for dance performances, including ballet, contemporary and Chinese dance forms. In the run up to the opening of further major performing arts venues in the WKCD, it will also be used for a wide variety of performing arts events including drama, opera and musical performances. The Lyric Theatre Complex will act as a platform for Hong Kong’s leading arts organisations, and be a new major venue to show programmes from Asia and worldwide.

The Monthly EM&A Report is prepared in accordance with the Condition 3.4 of the Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/B. This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works at both the main works of M+ Museum and foundation works of Lyric Theatre Complex conducted from 1 August to 31 August 2016. The purpose of this report is to summarise the findings in the EM&A of the project over the reporting period.

## 1.2 Project Organisation

The organisation chart and lines of communication with respect to the on-site environmental management structure together with the contact information of the key personnel are shown in Appendix A.

## 1.3 Environmental Status in the Reporting Period

During the reporting period, construction works at M+ Museum undertaken include:

● Excavation

● Construction of pile caps

● Construction of slab

● Construction of columns & walls

During the reporting period, construction works at Lyric Theatre Complex undertaken include:

● H-Pile Construction

● Bored Pile Construction

● Excavation and lateral support

The Construction Works Programmes of M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex are provided in Appendix B. A layout plan of the Project is provided in Figure 1. Please refer to Table 4.3 on the status of the environmental licenses.

## 1.4 Summary of EM&A Requirements

The EM&A programme requires environmental monitoring of air quality, noise, landscape and visual as specified in the approved EM&A Manual.

A summary of impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 1.1.

Table 1.1: Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements

Parameters | Descriptions | Locations | Frequencies
Air Quality | 24-Hour TSP | AM1 - International Commerce Centre | At least once every 6 days
1-Hour TSP | AM1 - International Commerce Centre | At least 3 times every 6 days
24-Hour TSP | AM2 - The Harbourside Tower 1 | At least once every 6 days
1-Hour TSP | AM2 - The Harbourside Tower 1 | At least 3 times every 6 days
Noise | Leq, 30 minutes | NM1- Podium level of The Harbourside Tower 1 | Weekly
Landscape & Visual | Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation measures during the construction stage | As described in Table 9.1 and 9.2 of the EM&A Manual | Bi-weekly

Given that the Project covers only a small part of the whole WKCD area (i.e. M+ Museum, Lyric Theatre Complex and respective portions of underpass road), it was proposed that the EM&A programme for the Project should only require 1 noise monitoring station and 2 air quality monitoring stations located closest to the Project area. Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring stations AM1, AM2 and NM1 were set up. Other monitoring locations are too far away (i.e. AM3 to AM5 and NM2 to NM5) are not included in this EM&A programme until the construction of the corresponding area commences.

The Harbourside management office formally rejected our proposal of setting up air quality and noise monitoring equipment on its premises at the podium level of Tower 1 (AM2/NM1) on 10 November 2015. Alternative noise monitoring location was identified at The Arch (NM2), however The Arch management office formally rejected our proposal of setting up noise monitoring equipment on its premises on 23 November 2015. Nevertheless, suitable air quality monitoring location at AM2 was identified on the ground floor in front of The Harbourside Tower 1, which is at the same location as that of baseline monitoring for consistency. No management approval is required at the ground floor for conducting the air monitoring and a secure electricity supply is available there. Noise monitoring at G/F of Harbourside will not be representative. Approval from the management office of the International Commerce Centre has been granted on 29 February 2016 for conducting noise monitoring at the alternative noise monitoring location identified at the podium floor (NM1A) which is free from screening to the construction activities. Therefore, 2 air quality monitoring stations and 1 noise impact monitoring station were confirmed for the impact monitoring.

The Environmental Quality Performance Limits for air quality and noise are shown in Appendix C.

The Event and Action Plan for air quality, construction noise. landscape and visual are shown in Appendix D.

The EM&A programme followed the recommended mitigation measures in the EM&A Manual. The EM&A requirements as well as the summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix J.

# 2 Impact Monitoring Methodology

## 2.1 Introduction

For air quality and noise, the monitoring methodology, including the monitoring locations, monitoring equipment used, monitoring parameters, and frequency and duration etc., for air quality and noise are detailed in this Section. The environmental monitoring schedules for the reporting period and the tentative monitoring Schedule for the coming month are provided in Appendix E.

For landscape and audit impact, the relevant EM&A monitoring requirements and details are also presented in this Section.

## 2.2 Air Quality

### 2.2.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Table 2.1 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of the TSP monitoring.

Table 2.1: Air Quality Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Parameter | Frequency | Duration
24-hour TSP | At least once in every six-days | 24 hours
1-hour TSP | At least 3 times every six-days | 60 minutes

### 2.2.2 Monitoring Locations

Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring stations AM1 and AM2 were set up at the proposed locations in accordance with updated EM&A Manual. Location of the monitoring station is given in Table 2.2 and shown in Figure 1.

Table 2.2: Air Quality Monitoring Station

Monitoring Station | Location
AM1 | International Commerce Centre (ICC)
AM2 | The Harbourside Tower 1

### 2.2.3 Monitoring Equipment

Continuous 24-hour TSP air quality monitoring was conducted using High Volume Sampler (HVS) (Model: TE-5170) located at the designated monitoring station. The HVS meets all the requirements stated in of the EM&A Manual. Portable direct reading dust meter was used to carry out the 1-hour TSP monitoring. Table 2.3 summarizes the equipment used in the impact air quality monitoring. Copies of the calibration certificates for the HVS, calibration kit and portable dust meters are attached in Appendix F.

Table 2.3: TSP Monitoring Equipment

Equipment | Model
24-hour TSP monitoring
High Volume Sampler | TE-5170 (Serial No.: 0767 and 8919)
Calibrator | TE-5025A (Orifice I.D.: 2454)
1-hour TSP monitoring
Portable direct reading dust meter | Sibata LD-3B (Serial No.: 245834)

Calibration of the HVS (five point calibration) using Calibration Kit was carried out every two months. The HVS calibration orifice will be calibrated annually. Calibration certificate of the TE-5025A Calibration Kit and the HVS are provided in Appendix F.

The 1-hour TSP monitoring should be determined periodically (e.g. annually) by the HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method.

### 2.2.4 Monitoring Methodology

24-hour TSP Monitoring

Installation

The HVS was installed at the site boundary. The following criteria were considered in the installation of the HVS.

– A horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the sampler against gusty wind was provided.

– The distance between the HVS and any obstacles, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the HVS.

– A minimum of 2 metres separation from walls, parapets and penthouse was required for rooftop sampler.

– A minimum of 2 metres separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally was required.

– No furnace or incinerator flues or building vent were nearby.

– Airflow around the sampler was unrestricted.

– The sampler has been more than 20 metres from any drip line.

– Permission was obtained to set up the sampler and to obtain access to the monitoring station.

– A secured supply of electricity is needed to operate the sampler.

Preparation of Filter Papers

– Glass fibre filters were labelled and sufficient filters that were clean and without pinholes were selected.

– The filters used are specified to have a minimum collection efficiency of 99 percent for 0.3 µm (DOP) particles.

– All filters were equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing. The conditioning environment temperature was around 25 °C and not variable by more than ±3 °C with relative humidity (RH) < 50% and was not variable by more than ±5 %. A convenient working RH was 40%. All preparation of filters was done by Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory.

Field Monitoring Procedures

– The power supply was checked to ensure the HVS works properly.

– The filter holder and the area surrounding the filter were cleaned.

– The filter holder was removed by loosening the four bolts and a new filter, with stamped number upward, on a supporting screen was aligned carefully.

– The filter was properly aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter.

– The swing bolts were fastened to hold the filter holder down to the frame. The pressure applied should be sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.

– The shelter lid was closed and was secured with the aluminium strip.

– The HVS was warmed-up for about 5 minutes to establish run-temperature conditions.

– A new flow rate record sheet was set into the flow recorder.

– The flow rate of the HVS was checked and adjusted at around 1.3 m3/min. The range specified in the EM&A Manual was between 0.6-1.7 m3/min.

– The programmable timer was set for a sampling period of 24 hours, and the starting time, weather condition and the filter number were recorded.

– The initial elapsed time was recorded.

– At the end of sampling, the sampled filter was removed carefully and folded in half length so that only surfaces with collected particulate matter were in contact.

– It was then placed in a clean plastic envelope and sealed.

– All monitoring information was recorded on a standard data sheet.

– Filters were sent to a Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory for analysis.

Maintenance and Calibration

– The HVS and its accessories are maintained in good working condition, such as replacing motor brushes routinely and checking electrical wiring to ensure a continuous power supply.

– HVSs were calibrated upon installation and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals. The calibration kits were calibrated annually.

– Calibration records for HVS and calibration kit are shown in Appendix F.

1-hour TSP Monitoring

Field Monitoring

The measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:

– Turn the power on.

– Close the air collecting opening cover.

– Push the “TIME SETTING” switch to [BG].

– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform background measurement for 6 seconds.

– Turn the knob at SENSI ADJ position to insert the light scattering plate.

– Leave the equipment for 1 minute upon “SPAN CHECK” is indicated in the display.

– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform automatic sensitivity adjustment. This measurement takes 1 minute.

– Pull out the knob and return it to MEASURE position.

– Setting time period of 1 hour for the 1-hour TSP measurement.

– Push “START/STOP” to start the 1-hour TSP measurement.

– Regular checking of the time period setting to ensure monitoring time of 1 hour.

Maintenance and Calibration

– The 1-hour dust meter would be checked at 3-month intervals and calibrated at 1-year intervals throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.

– Calibration records for direct dust meters are shown in Appendix F.

Weather Condition

– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.

## 2.3 Noise

### 2.3.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Table 2.4 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of noise monitoring. The noise in A-weighted levels Leq, L10 and L90 are recorded in a 30-minute interval between 0700 and 1900 hours.

Table 2.4: Noise Monitoring Parameters, Period and Frequency

Time Period | Parameters | Frequency
Daytime on normal weekdays (0700-1900 hours) | Leq(30 min), L90(30 min) & L10 (30 min) | Once every week

### 2.3.2 Monitoring Location

Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring station NM1A was set up at the proposed location in accordance with updated EM&A Manual. Location of the monitoring station is given in Table 2.5 and shown in Figure 1.

Table 2.5: Noise Monitoring Station

Monitoring Station | Location
NM1A | Podium floor of International Commerce Centre (ICC)

Source: <Insert Notes or Source>

### 2.3.3 Monitoring Equipment

Integrating Sound Level Meter was used for noise monitoring. It was a Type 1 sound level meter capable of giving a continuous readout of the noise level readings including equivalent continuous sound pressure level (LAeq) and percentile sound pressure level (Lx). They comply with International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1). Table 2.6 summarizes the noise monitoring equipment model being used.

Table 2.6: Noise Monitoring Equipments

Monitoring Station | Equipment Model
Integrating Sound Level Meter | Calibrator
NM1A | Rion NL-52 (Serial No.00131627) | Rion NC-73 (Serial No.10997142)

### 2.3.4 Monitoring Methodology

Field Monitoring

– The microphone of the Sound Level Meter was set at least 1.2 m above the ground.

– Free Field measurement was made at the monitoring locations.

– The battery condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.

– Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:

- frequency weighting: A

- time weighting: Fast

- time measurement: 30 minutes intervals (between 0700-1900 on normal weekdays)

– Prior to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for 94 dB at 1 kHz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement was more than 1 dB, the measurement would be considered invalid and has to be repeated after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.

– During the monitoring period, the Leq, L10 and L90 were recorded. In addition, any site observations and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.

– A correction of +3dB(A) was made to the free field measurements.

Maintenance and Calibration

– The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator is cleaned with soft cloth at quarterly intervals.

– The sound level meter and calibrator are sent to the supplier or HOKLAS laboratory to check and calibrate at yearly intervals.

– Calibration records are shown in Appendix F.

Weather Condition

– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.

## 2.4 Landscape and Visual

### 2.4.1 Monitoring Program

Table 2.7 details the monitoring program (as proposed in the WKCD EIA report) for landscape and visual impact during the construction phase.

Table 2.7: Monitoring Program for Landscape and Visual Impact during Construction Phase

Stage | Monitoring Task | Frequency | Report | Approval
Construction | Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation measures during the construction stage. | Bi-weekly | ET to report on Contractor’s compliance | Counter-signed by IEC

During the landscape and visual impact monitoring, any changes in relation to the landscape and visual amenity should be monitored with reference to the baseline conditions of the site. In addition, mitigation measures were proposed in the WKCD EIA report to minimise the landscape and visual impacts during the construction phase. The proposed mitigation measures as shown in Table 9.1 and Table 9.2 of the EM&A Manual should be checked for proper implementation.

# 3 Monitoring Results

## 3.1 Impact Monitoring

Construction impact monitoring for air quality, noise and landscape and visual impact was undertaken in compliance with the EM&A Manual during the reporting month.

## 3.2 Air Quality Monitoring

### 3.2.1 1-hour TSP

Results of 1-hour TSP at the monitoring location AM1 and AM2 are summarised in Table 3.1. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.

Table 3.1: Summary of 1-hour TSP monitoring results

Monitoring Station | Monitoring Date | Start Time | 1-hour TSP (μg/m3) | Range (μg/m3) | Action Level (μg/m3) | Limit Level (μg/m3)
1st Result | 2nd Result | 3rd Result
AM1 | 03-Aug-16 | 10:45 | 62 | 58 | 55 | 51-70 | 273.7 | 500
09-Aug-16 | 10:21 | 64 | 66 | 70
15-Aug-16 | 10:40 | 55 | 57 | 60
19-Aug-16 | 8:04 | 51 | 53 | 55
25-Aug-16 | 10:47 | 51 | 55 | 52
31-Aug-16 | 10:30 | 64 | 61 | 70
AM2 | 03-Aug-16 | 10:53 | 62 | 60 | 56 | 54-77 | 274.2 | 500
09-Aug-16 | 10:33 | 69 | 70 | 74
15-Aug-16 | 10:52 | 64 | 59 | 67
19-Aug-16 | 8:14 | 59 | 60 | 66
25-Aug-16 | 10:57 | 54 | 59 | 57
31-Aug-16 | 10:42 | 75 | 69 | 77

### 3.2.2 24-hour TSP

Results of 24-hour TSP at the monitoring location AM1 and AM2 are summarised in Table 3.2. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.

Table 3.2: Summary of 24-hour TSP monitoring results

Monitoring Station | Monitoring Date | Start Time | Monitoring Results (μg/m3) | Range (μg/m3) | Action Level (μg/m3) | Limit Level (μg/m3)
AM1 | 03-Aug-16 | 10:43 | 43 | 43-51 | 143.6 | 260
09-Aug-16 | 10:23 | 51
15-Aug-16 | 10:42 | 47
19-Aug-16 | 08:00 | 44
25-Aug-16 | 10:45 | 48
31-Aug-16 | 10:32 | 49
AM2 | 03-Aug-16 | 10:55 | 43 | 43-64 | 151.1 | 260
09-Aug-16 | 10:35 | 64
15-Aug-16 | 10:54 | 56
19-Aug-16 | 08:18 | 50
25-Aug-16 | 11:00 | 43
31-Aug-16 | Suspended due to Electricity Issue

No exceedance of 1-hour and 24-hour TSP (Action or Limit Level) was recorded in the reporting period.

## 3.3 Noise Monitoring

The construction noise monitoring results at the monitoring location NM1A are summarized in Table 3.3. Graphical plots of the monitoring data and the station set-up of a free-field measurement are shown in Appendix G.

Table 3.3: Summary of noise monitoring results during normal weekdays

Monitoring Date | Start Time | End Time | Leq (30 mins), dB(A) | Limit Level for Leq (dB(A))
02-Aug-16 | 14:00 | 14:30 | 69.2 | 75
09-Aug-16 | 14:00 | 14:30 | 69.2
15-Aug-16 | 14:00 | 14:30 | 68.7
25-Aug-16 | 14:00 | 14:30 | 69.0
31-Aug-16 | 14:00 | 14:30 | 69.1

Remarks: +3dB (A) correction was applied to free-field measurement.

No exceedance (Action/Limit Level) of construction noise was recorded in the reporting period as no noise related environmental complaint was received during the reporting period and noise levels recorded during the monitoring period were below 75 dB(A).

Construction works were extended to holidays on 7, 14, 21 and 28 August 2016. Additional monitoring was carried out during the restricted hours on 7, 14, 21 and 28 August 2016. The measured Leq (30 mins) is in the range of 68.1 – 69.4 dB(A). Construction Noise Permit for the works carried out during restricted hours was obtained and listed in Table 4.3.

## 3.4 Landscape and Visual Impact

Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the weekly site inspections on 4 and 18 August 2016 for M+ Museum and 3, 16 and 31 August 2016 for Lyric Theatre Complex during the reporting month. As reviewed by the registered Landscape Architect, no adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.

The landscape and visual mitigation measures were implemented during the reporting period. The summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix J.

# 4 Environmental Site Inspection

## 4.1 Site Inspection

### 4.1.1 M+ Museum

Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 4, 12, 18 and 25 August 2016. The joint site inspection with IEC, ET, ER and Contractor was held on 12 August 2016. EPD site inspection with Contractor was conducted on 1, 2 and 18 August 2016. Items including overall drainage arrangements, water samples at discharge points were inspected. No non-compliance was recorded during the site inspection. All observations have been recorded in the site inspection checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate recommended mitigation measures where necessary. The key observations from the site inspections and associated recommendations are summarized in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1: Summary of Site Inspections and Recommendations for M+ Museum

Inspection Date | Parameter | Observation / Recommendation | Contactor’s Responses / Action(s) Undertaken | Close-out (Date)
28 Jul 2016 | Water quality | The contractor was reminded to put boot washing facilities in proper place for use near Gate 1. | The contractor has provided boot washing facilities near Gate 1. | 4 Aug 2016
28 Jul 2016 | Waste management | The contractor was reminded to enhance the cleaning frequency of all drip trays. | The contractor has enhanced cleaning frequency of the drip trays. | 4 Aug 2016
4 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The contractor was reminded to provide pump near wetsep no.5 to collect the stagnant water for wastewater treatment. | The contractor has cleared the stagnant water near wetsep no.5. | 12 Aug 2016
4 Aug 2016 | Waste management | Oil stain was found on the ground near discharge point at M+. The contractor as reminded to clear the oil stain and treat it as chemical waste. | The contractor has cleared the oil stain near M+ discharge point | 10 Aug 2016
4 Aug 2016 | Waste management | Some chemical containers was found without drip trays in some site area and at wetsep no.2. The contractor was reminded to remove those chemical containers if not in use. | The chemical containers previously observed without drip trays in site and wetsep no .2 was removed. | 10 Aug 2016
4 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The effluent at M+ discharge point was found within acceptable pH range, but a bit milky comparing with control solution. It was found that some site runoff was washed into one of the dewatering well which was the cause of milky effluent observed. The contractor was reminded to collect the site runoff and apply wastewater treatment before discharge. | The effluent at M+ discharge point was found visually clear when comparing with control solution. | 10 Aug 2016
12 Aug 2016 | Waste management | The chemical store was observed without lock. The contractor was reminded to provide lock and improve the access to the chemical store. | Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month | On-going
12 Aug 2016 | Others | The contractor was reminded to provide proper protection for the trees near seafront area. | The contractor has provided protection to the trees near seafront. | 18 Aug 2016
12 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The contractor was reminded to enhance the wastewater treatment at wetsep no. 2 and 5. | Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month | On-going
12 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The contractor was reminded to seal the footing of the hoarding near seafront to prevent leakage of site runoff. | The contractor has sealed the footing of the hoarding near seafront. | 18 Aug 2016
12 Aug 2016 | Waste management | The contractor was reminded to provide drip trays for all containers in site area. The contractor was also reminded to replace the drip trays near wetsep no.4 with a larger one as the drip tray was observed not sufficient. | Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month | On-going
12 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The effleunt at ICP discharge point was found visually clear and within acceptable pH range. | N/A | N/A
18 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The contractor was reminded to clearly label the pipe to indicate the pipe flow at A10a. | The contractor has removed the pipe at A10a. | 25 Aug 2016
18 Aug 2016 | Waste management | The contractor was reminded to remove the construction waste/ refuse off site. | The contractor has removed the refuse off site. | 25 Aug 2016
18 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The contractor was reminded to remove the stagnant water at B1 slab. | The contractor has removed the stagnant water at B1 slab | 25 Aug 2016
18 Aug 2016 | Water quality | Overflow was observed at wetsep no. 3. The contractor was reminded to rectify it as soon as possible. | The contractor was rectified the overflow previoulsy observed at wetsep no. 3. | 25 Aug 2016
18 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The contractor was reminded to remove the stagnant water near wetsep no. 5 and review the treatment capacity of wetsep no.5. | The contractor has removed the stagnant water near wetsep no. 5 and diverted a pipe from wetsep no. 5 to no. 3. | 25 Aug 2016
18 Aug 2016 | Waste management | Oil leakage was observed at ICP. The contractor was reminded to remove the oil leakage and treat it as chemical waste. | The contractor has removed the oil leakage at ICP. | 25 Aug 2016
18 Aug 2016 | Water quality | Effluent at ICP discharge point and all wetseps at M+ was checked and found visually clear comparing with control solution and in acceptable pH range. | N/A | N/A
25 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The contractor was reminded to provide an updated drainage layout plan at each wetsep. | Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month | On-going
25 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The contractor to provide wheel washing at bar bending yard. | Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month | On-going
25 Aug 2016 | Air quality | The contractor was reminded to enhance water spraying at bar bending yard as the ground was observed dry and dusty. | Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month | On-going
25 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The contractor was reminded to remove stagnant water at B1 slab. | Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month | On-going
25 Aug 2016 | Water quality | Leakage of muddy water was observed for a pipe at Gate 3. The contractor was reminded to rectify it and ensure the muddy water was treated before discharging. | Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month | On-going
25 Aug 2016 | Water quality | Effluent at discharge point at ICP and all wetseps at M+ was checked and found visually clear comparing with standard solution and in acceptable pH range. | N/A | N/A

### 4.1.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 3, 10, 16, 24 and 31 August 2016. The joint site inspection with IEC, ET, ER and Contractor was held on 16 August 2016. No non-compliance was recorded during the site inspection. All observations have been recorded in the site inspection checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate recommended mitigation measures where necessary. The key observations from the site inspections and associated recommendations are summarized in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2: Summary of Site Inspections and Recommendations for Lyric Theatre Complex

Inspection Date | Parameter | Observation / Recommendation | Contactor’s Responses / Action(s) Undertaken | Close-out (Date)
3 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The contractor was reminded to install a trench near area L02 to avoid surface runoff to the harbour. | A trench has been installed to avoid surface runoff to the harbour. | 6 Aug 2016
10 Aug 2016 | Water quality | The treated effluent at both wetseps was observed to be muddy. The contractor was reminded to check the functionality of wetseps and ensure proper dosage of chemicals. | De-sludging and clearance of muddy effluent at both Wetsep units were conducted. | 13 Aug 2016
10 Aug 2016 | Waste management | The oil tank was not properly placed inside the drip tray. The contractor was reminded to ensure proper chemical storage. | Oil drum was placed properly inside drip tray. | 13 Aug 2016
10 Aug 2016 | Waste management | Oil stain was observed at the site. The contractor was reminded to remove it and treat it as chemical waste. | Oil stain was cleaned up and no longer observed. | 13 Aug 2016
16 Aug 2016 | Air quality | The emission from a generator appeared to be slightly dark. The Contractor was reminded to ensure proper maintenance to prevent dark smoke emission. | Maintenance of generator has been undertaken to prevent dark smoke emission. | 19 Aug 2016
16 Aug 2016 | Water quality | Leakage of muddy site runoff was observed at the public footpath via the site hoarding. The Contractor was asked to seal any leaks at the bottom of site hoarding and clear the observed leakage. | The site runoff has been cleaned and the site hoarding has been sealed. | 19 Aug 2016
24 Aug 2016 | Air quality | Haul road was observed near area L02 and L03. The contractor was reminded to increase water spraying frequency. | The contractor has increased water spraying frequency. | 31 Aug 2016
24 Aug 2016 | Noise | The panel of the power pack was found open. The contractor was reminded to close the panel of the power pack. | The power pack has been removed. | 31 Aug 2016
31 Aug 2016 | Water quality | Turbid water was observed at the wetsep near site entrance. The contractor was reminded to desludge more frequently to ensure good efficiency of wetsep. | Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month. | On-going

## 4.2 Advice on the Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status

The Contractors have been registered as a chemical waste producer for the Project. Construction and demolition (C&D) material sorting will be carried out on site. A sufficient number of receptacles were available for general refuse collection.

### 4.2.1 M+ Museum

As advised by the Contractor, 219.23 ton and 1,058.34 ton of inert C&D material were disposed of as public fill to Tuen Mun Area 38 and Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Public Fill respectively, while 104.9 ton of general refuse was disposed of at SENT landfill. 111.3 ton of metals, 0.3 ton of paper/cardboard packaging, 0 ton of plastic and 38.5 ton of timber were collected by recycling contractors in the reporting month. 0 ton of inert C&D materials was reused on site. 12,432.0 ton of inert C&D materials were reused in other projects. 0 ton of chemical waste was collected by licensed contractors in the reporting period.

The actual amounts of different types of waste generated by the activities of construction works at M+ Museum in the reporting month are shown in Appendix I.

### 4.2.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

As advised by the Contractor, 2631.8 ton and 11788.1 ton of inert C&D material were disposed of as public fill to Tuen Mun Area 38 and Tseung Kwan O Area 137 respectively, while 11.1 ton of general refuse was disposed of at SENT landfill. 43.9 ton of metals, 0 ton of paper/cardboard packaging, 0 ton of plastic and 0 ton of timber were collected by recycling contractors in the reporting month. 0 ton of inert C&D materials was reused on site. 0 ton of inert C&D materials was reused in other projects. 0 ton of chemical wastes was collected by licensed contractors in the reporting period.

The actual amounts of different types of waste generated by the activities of construction works at Lyric Theatre Complex in the reporting month are shown in Appendix I.

## 4.3 Status of Environmental Licenses and Permits

The environmental permits, licenses, and/or notifications on environmental protection for this Project which were valid during the period are summarised in Table 4.3 and Table 4.4.

### 4.3.1 M+ Museum

Table 4.3: Status of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for M+ Museum

Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No. | Valid Period | Status | Remarks
From | To
Chemical Waste Producer Registration
5213-217-H2913-45 | 05-Nov-15 | -- | Valid | --
Billing Account Construction Waste Disposal
7023393 | 13-Oct-15 | -- | Account Active | --
Construction Noise Permit
GW-RE0637-16 | 30-Jun-16 | 29-Dec-16 | Vaild | --
Wastewater Discharge License
WT00023633-2016 | 4-Mar-16 | 31-Mar-21 | Valid | --
Notification under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation
394083 | 7-Oct-15 | -- | Notified | --

### 4.3.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Table 4.4: Status of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for Lyric Theatre Complex

Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No. | Valid Period | Status | Remarks
From | To
Chemical Waste Producer Registration
5213-217-G2347-39 | 17-Feb-16 | -- | Valid | --
Billing Account Construction Waste Disposal
7024189 | 25-Jan-16 | -- | Account Active | --
Construction Noise Permit
GW-RE0402-16 | 25-Apr-16 | 24-Oct-16 | Valid | --
Wastewater Discharge License
WT00023648-2016 | 9-Mar-16 | 31-Mar-21 | Valid | --
Notification under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation
398075 | 18-Jan-16 | -- | Notified | --

## 4.4 Recommended Mitigation Measures

The EM&A programme followed the recommended mitigation measures in the EM&A Manual. The EM&A requirements as well as the summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix J. In particular, the following mitigation measures were brought to attention during the site inspections:

### 4.4.1 M+ Museum

Chemical and Waste Management

– All chemicals stored on site should be provided with drip trays.

– Locks should be provided to chemical store.

– Drip trays should be kept in good condition.

– Any chemical leakage should be properly collected and treated as chemical waste.

– Good housekeeping of site should be maintained.

Air Quality

– Maintain high standard of housekeeping to prevent emission of fugitive dust.

Water Quality

– Wetsep units should be regularly checked to ensure proper function and adequate capacity of the system to treat wastewater or runoff before discharge.

– All wastewater or site runoff must be treated in wastewater treatment facilities before discharge.

– Provide drainage layout plan for all wetsep units and all pipes should be clearly labelled to indicate the pipe flow.

– Frequent checking of pipes to ensure no leakage

– All stagnant water in site area should be properly collected and treated before discharge.

– Wheel washing should be carried out at proper wheel washing facilities and within site area.

– Boot washing facilities should be provided at site entrance.

– Ensure no seepage at site boundary to prevent any runoff from flowing out of site area.

Others

– Proper tree protection should be provided to trees

### 4.4.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Chemical and Waste Management

– All chemicals stored on-site should be provided with drip trays.

– Drip trays should be kept in good condition.

– Chemical waste in drip trays should be frequently removed and ensure no leakage of oil/ chemicals from machines.

Air Quality

– Enhance water spraying frequency to reduce dust impact.

– All machines on-site should be regularly checked.

Water Quality

– Stagnant water at the site should be regularly removed.

– No leakage of site runoff from the site near site boundary and discharge point should be ensured.

– The trail at the vehicular site entrance should be regularly cleaned.

# 5 Compliance with Environmental Permit

The status of the required submission under the EP during the reporting period is summarized in Table 5.1.

Table 5.1: Status of Submissions under the Environmental Permit

EP Condition | Submission | Submission Date
Condition 3.4 | Monthly EM&A Report for July 2016 | 12 August 2016

#

# 6 Report in Non-compliance, Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

## 6.1 Record on Non-compliance of Action and Limit Levels

There was no breach of Action or Limit Levels for Air Quality and Noise monitoring in the reporting month.

## 6.2 Record on Environmental Complaints Received

One environmental complaint was referred from EPD on 13 July 2016 in the last reporting month. The complaint was handled in accordance with the EM&A Manual and relevant parties including the Engineer’s Representative and IEC were informed of the complaint.

The complainant claimed that muddy water was generated from the WKCDA construction sites and discharged to the harbour, and yellowish muddy water can be seen discharging to the Victoria Harbour via the drainage reserve outfall. The investigation results revealed that all wastewater treatment facilities were in place for treating all site runoff and wastewater generated from the construction activities during the concerned period. No muddy water was found during daily discharge water quality checking. Therefore, the muddy water discharged to the harbour was unlikely to be from works associated with M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex. Nonetheless, the contractors were reminded to strictly implement mitigation measures to ensure the water discharge complies with the standards as stipulated in the discharge license.

The cumulative statistics on complaints were provided in Appendix K.

## 6.3 Record on Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecution

No notifications of summons or successful prosecution were received this month. The cumulative statistics on notifications of summons and successful prosecutions were provided in Appendix K.

##

# 7 Future Key Issues

## 7.1 Construction Works for the Coming Month(s)

### 7.1.1 M+ Museum

The major site works scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

● Excavation

● Construction of pile caps

● Construction of slab

● Construction of columns & walls

### 7.1.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

The major site works scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

● H-Pile Construction

● Bored Pile Construction

● Excavation and lateral support

## 7.2 Key Issues for the Coming Month

### 7.2.1 M+ Museum

Key issues to be considered in the coming month include:

● Generation of dust from construction works;

● Noise impact from operating equipment and machinery on-site;

● Generation of site surface runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;

● Management of stockpiles and slopes, particularly on rainy days;

● Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste; and

● Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site.

### 7.2.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Key issues to be considered in the coming month include:

● Generation of dust from construction works;

● Noise impact from operating equipment and machinery on-site;

● Generation of site surface runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;

● Management of stockpiles and slopes, particularly on rainy days;

● Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste; and

● Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site.

## 7.3 Monitoring Schedule for the Coming Month

The environmental site inspection and environmental monitoring will be continued in the coming month. Impact monitoring for air quality and noise in accordance with the approved EM&A Manual has commenced since 31 October 2015 and 5 March 2016 respectively. The tentative monitoring schedule for the coming month is shown in the Appendix E.

# 8 Conclusions and Recommendations

## 8.1 Conclusions

The EM&A programme as recommended in the EM&A Manual has been undertaken since the construction of M+ Museum main works commenced on 31 October 2015, and the construction of Lyric Therate Complex foundation works commenced on 1 March 2016.

Monitoring of air quality and noise with respect to the Projects is underway. In particular, the 1-hour TSP, 24-hour TSP, noise level (as Leq, 30 minutes) under monitoring have been checked against established Action and Limit levels. There was no breach of Action and Limit Levels for 1-hour TSP, 24-hour TSP and noise in the reporting month.

No environmental complaint and no notifications of summons or successful prosecution were received during the reporting month.

Weekly construction phase site inspections and bi-weekly landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted during the reporting month as required. It was observed that the Contractors had implemented all possible and feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the potential environmental impacts during construction phase works.

## 8.2 Recommendations

Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities, including air quality, noise, water quality, waste, landscape and visual, will be monitored or reviewed. The recommended environmental mitigation measures shall be implemented on site and regular inspections as required will be carried out to ensure that the environmental conditions are acceptable.