Mott MacDonald Hong Kong Limited (MMHK) was commissioned to undertake the Environmental Team (ET) services (including environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A)) for the construction of M+ Museum Main Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/022) and Lyric Theatre Complex Foundation Works (Contract No.: CC/2015/3A/014) at West Kowloon Cultural District (WKCD) (The Project) as part of the WKCD development. The Project Proponent is the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority (WKCDA). The construction works and EM&A programme for M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex commenced on 31 October 2015 and 1 March 2016 respectively.

The overall works for the WKCD fall under two separate categories of Designated Project (DP) of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO), namely an “engineering feasibility study of urban development projects with a study area covering more than 20 ha or involving a total population of more than 100 000” (Item 3 of Schedule 3) and “an underpass more than 100m in length under the built areas” (Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2). An Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/A (EP) was issued with respect to the “Underpass Road and Austin Road Flyover Serving the West Kowloon Cultural District” which specifically includes the abovementioned category of DP under Item A.9, Part I, Schedule 2 of the EIAO.

This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works at both the main works of M+ Museum and foundation works of Lyric Theatre Complex conducted from 1 June to 30 June 2016.

Exceedance of Action and Limit Levels

There was no breach of Action or Limit levels for Air Quality (1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and Noise in this reporting month.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures

Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 2, 10 (with follow-up inspection on 13 June 2016), 16, 23 and 30 June 2016 for M+ Museum and 1, 7, 17, 22 and 28 June 2016 for Lyric Theatre Complex to confirm the implementation measures undertaken by the Contractors in the reporting month The outcomes are presented in Section 4 and the status of implementation of mitigation measures in the site is shown in Appendix J.

Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the abovementioned weekly site inspections during the reporting month. No adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.

EPD site inspection with Contractor was conducted on 10, 21 and 22 June 2016 at M+ Museum. A pink form was issued to the Contractor on 10 June 2016 and water sample at discharge point at ICP of M+ Museum was collected by EPD.

EPD site inspection with Contractor was conducted on 29 June 2016 at Lyric Theatre Complex.

Record of Complaints

One environmental complaint regarding muddy water discharge was recorded in the reporting month.

Record of Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

No notification of summons and successful prosecution were recorded in the reporting month.

Future Key Issues

The major site works at M+ Museum scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

¡ Excavation

¡ Construction of pile caps

¡ Installation/ removal of strut of lateral support

¡ Construction of slab

¡ Construction of core wall

The major site works at Lyric Theatre Complex scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

¡ H-Pile Construction

¡ Bored Pile Construction

¡ Excavation and lateral support

Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities, including air quality, noise, water quality, waste, landscape and visual, will be monitored or reviewed. The recommended environmental mitigation measures shall be implemented on site and regular inspections as required will be carried out to ensure that the environmental conditions are acceptable.

1 Introduction

1.1 Background

The M+ museum development aims to provide an iconic presence for the M+ museum, semi-transparent vertical plane, housing education facilities, a public restaurant and museum offices. At ground and lower levels, generous access will be provided to the park and other West Kowloon Cultural District facilities, alongside a public resource centre, theatres, retail and dining, and back-of-house functions.

The 1,200-seat Lyric Theatre Complex will be Hong Kong’s first world-class facility for dance performances, including ballet, contemporary and Chinese dance forms. In the run up to the opening of further major performing arts venues in the WKCD, it will also be used for a wide variety of performing arts events including drama, opera and musical performances. The Lyric Theatre Complex will act as a platform for Hong Kong’s leading arts organisations, and be a new major venue to show programmes from Asia and worldwide.

The Monthly EM&A Report is prepared in accordance with the Condition 3.4 of the Environmental Permit No. EP-453/2013/A. This Monthly EM&A Report presents the monitoring works at both the main works of M+ Museum and foundation works of Lyric Theatre Complex conducted from 1 June to 30 June 2016. The purpose of this report is to summarise the findings in the EM&A of the project over the reporting period.

1.2 Project Organisation

The organisation chart and lines of communication with respect to the on-site environmental management structure together with the contact information of the key personnel are shown in Appendix A.

1.3 Environmental Status in the Reporting Period

During the reporting period, construction works at M+ Museum undertaken include:

¡ Excavation

¡ Construction of pile caps

¡ Installation of lateral support

¡ Construction of slab

¡ Construction of water tank

¡ Construction of core wall

During the reporting period, construction works at Lyric Theatre Complex undertaken include:

¡ H-Pile Construction

¡ Bored Pile Construction

¡ Excavation and lateral support

The Construction Works Programmes of M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex are provided in Appendix B. A layout plan of the Project is provided in Figure 1. Please refer to Table 4.3 on the status of the environmental licenses.

1.4 Summary of EM&A Requirements

The EM&A programme requires environmental monitoring of air quality, noise, landscape and visual as specified in the approved EM&A Manual.

A summary of impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 1.1.

Table 1.1: Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements

Parameters	Descriptions	Locations	Frequencies
Air Quality	24-Hour TSP	AM1 - International Commerce Centre	At least once every 6 days
	1-Hour TSP	AM1 - International Commerce Centre	At least 3 times every 6 days
	24-Hour TSP	AM2 - The Harbourside Tower 1	At least once every 6 days
	1-Hour TSP	AM2 - The Harbourside Tower 1	At least 3 times every 6 days
Noise	L_eq, 30 minutes	NM1- Podium level of The Harbourside Tower 1	Weekly
Landscape & Visual	Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation measures during the construction stage	As described in Table 9.1 and 9.2 of the EM&A Manual	Bi-weekly

Given that the Project covers only a small part of the whole WKCD area (i.e. M+ Museum, Lyric Theatre Complex and respective portions of underpass road), it was proposed that the EM&A programme for the Project should only require 1 noise monitoring station and 2 air quality monitoring stations located closest to the Project area. Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring stations AM1, AM2 and NM1 were set up. Other monitoring locations are too far away (i.e. AM3 to AM5 and NM2 to NM5) are not included in this EM&A programme until the construction of the corresponding area commences.

The Harbourside management office formally rejected our proposal of setting up air quality and noise monitoring equipment on its premises at the podium level of Tower 1 (AM2/NM1) on 10 November 2015. Alternative noise monitoring location was identified at The Arch (NM2), however The Arch management office formally rejected our proposal of setting up noise monitoring equipment on its premises on 23 November 2015. Nevertheless, suitable air quality monitoring location at AM2 was identified on the ground floor in front of The Harbourside Tower 1, which is at the same location as that of baseline monitoring for consistency. No management approval is required at the ground floor for conducting the air monitoring and a secure electricity supply is available there. Noise monitoring at G/F of Harbourside will not be representative. Approval from the management office of the International Commerce Centre has been granted on 29 February 2016 for conducting noise monitoring at the alternative noise monitoring location identified at the podium floor (NM1A) which is free from screening to the construction activities. Therefore, 2 air quality monitoring stations and 1 noise impact monitoring station were confirmed for the impact monitoring.

The Environmental Quality Performance Limits for air quality and noise are shown in Appendix C.

The Event and Action Plan for air quality, construction noise. landscape and visual are shown in Appendix D.

2 Impact Monitoring Methodology

2.1 Introduction

For air quality and noise, the monitoring methodology, including the monitoring locations, monitoring equipment used, monitoring parameters, and frequency and duration etc., for air quality and noise are detailed in this Section. The environmental monitoring schedules for the reporting period and the tentative monitoring Schedule for the coming month are provided in Appendix E.

For landscape and audit impact, the relevant EM&A monitoring requirements and details are also presented in this Section.

2.2 Air Quality

2.2.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Table 2.1 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of the TSP monitoring.

Table 2.1: Air Quality Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Parameter	Frequency	Duration
24-hour TSP	At least once in every six-days	24 hours
1-hour TSP	At least 3 times every six-days	60 minutes

2.2.2 Monitoring Locations

Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring stations AM1 and AM2 were set up at the proposed locations in accordance with updated EM&A Manual. Location of the monitoring station is given in Table 2.2 and shown in Figure 1.

Table 2.2: Air Quality Monitoring Station

Monitoring Station	Location
AM1	International Commerce Centre (ICC)
AM2	The Harbourside Tower 1

2.2.3 Monitoring Equipment

Continuous 24-hour TSP air quality monitoring was conducted using High Volume Sampler (HVS) (Model: TE-5170) located at the designated monitoring station. The HVS meets all the requirements stated in of the EM&A Manual. Portable direct reading dust meter was used to carry out the 1-hour TSP monitoring. Table 2.3 summarizes the equipment used in the impact air quality monitoring. Copies of the calibration certificates for the HVS, calibration kit and portable dust meters are attached in Appendix F.

Table 2.3: TSP Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Model
24-hour TSP monitoring
High Volume Sampler	TE-5170 (Serial No.: 0767 and 8919)
Calibrator	TE-5025A (Orifice I.D.: 2454)
1-hour TSP monitoring
Portable direct reading dust meter	Sibata LD-3B (Serial No.: 245834)

Calibration of the HVS (five point calibration) using Calibration Kit was carried out every two months. The HVS calibration orifice will be calibrated annually. Calibration certificate of the TE-5025A Calibration Kit and the HVS are provided in Appendix F.

The 1-hour TSP monitoring should be determined periodically (e.g. annually) by the HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct reading method.

2.2.4 Monitoring Methodology

24-hour TSP Monitoring

Installation

The HVS was installed at the site boundary. The following criteria were considered in the installation of the HVS.

– A horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the sampler against gusty wind was provided.

– The distance between the HVS and any obstacles, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the HVS.

– A minimum of 2 metres separation from walls, parapets and penthouse was required for rooftop sampler.

– A minimum of 2 metres separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally was required.

– No furnace or incinerator flues or building vent were nearby.

– Airflow around the sampler was unrestricted.

– The sampler has been more than 20 metres from any drip line.

– Permission was obtained to set up the sampler and to obtain access to the monitoring station.

– A secured supply of electricity is needed to operate the sampler.

Preparation of Filter Papers

– Glass fibre filters were labelled and sufficient filters that were clean and without pinholes were selected.

– The filters used are specified to have a minimum collection efficiency of 99 percent for 0.3 µm (DOP) particles.

– All filters were equilibrated in the conditioning environment for 24 hours before weighing. The conditioning environment temperature was around 25 °C and not variable by more than ±3 °C with relative humidity (RH) < 50% and was not variable by more than ±5 %. A convenient working RH was 40%. All preparation of filters was done by Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory.

Field Monitoring Procedures

– The power supply was checked to ensure the HVS works properly.

– The filter holder and the area surrounding the filter were cleaned.

– The filter holder was removed by loosening the four bolts and a new filter, with stamped number upward, on a supporting screen was aligned carefully.

– The filter was properly aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter.

– The swing bolts were fastened to hold the filter holder down to the frame. The pressure applied should be sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges.

– The shelter lid was closed and was secured with the aluminium strip.

– The HVS was warmed-up for about 5 minutes to establish run-temperature conditions.

– A new flow rate record sheet was set into the flow recorder.

– The flow rate of the HVS was checked and adjusted at around 1.3 m³/min. The range specified in the EM&A Manual was between 0.6-1.7 m³/min.

– The programmable timer was set for a sampling period of 24 hours, and the starting time, weather condition and the filter number were recorded.

– The initial elapsed time was recorded.

– At the end of sampling, the sampled filter was removed carefully and folded in half length so that only surfaces with collected particulate matter were in contact.

– It was then placed in a clean plastic envelope and sealed.

– All monitoring information was recorded on a standard data sheet.

– Filters were sent to a Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme (HOKLAS) accredited laboratory for analysis.

Maintenance and Calibration

– The HVS and its accessories are maintained in good working condition, such as replacing motor brushes routinely and checking electrical wiring to ensure a continuous power supply.

– HVSs were calibrated upon installation and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals. The calibration kits were calibrated annually.

– Calibration records for HVS and calibration kit are shown in Appendix F.

1-hour TSP Monitoring

Field Monitoring

The measuring procedures of the 1-hour dust meter are in accordance with the Manufacturer’s Instruction Manual as follows:

– Turn the power on.

– Close the air collecting opening cover.

– Push the “TIME SETTING” switch to [BG].

– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform background measurement for 6 seconds.

– Turn the knob at SENSI ADJ position to insert the light scattering plate.

– Leave the equipment for 1 minute upon “SPAN CHECK” is indicated in the display.

– Push “START/STOP” switch to perform automatic sensitivity adjustment. This measurement takes 1 minute.

– Pull out the knob and return it to MEASURE position.

– Setting time period of 1 hour for the 1-hour TSP measurement.

– Push “START/STOP” to start the 1-hour TSP measurement.

– Regular checking of the time period setting to ensure monitoring time of 1 hour.

Maintenance and Calibration

– The 1-hour dust meter would be checked at 3-month intervals and calibrated at 1-year intervals throughout all stages of the air quality monitoring.

– Calibration records for direct dust meters are shown in Appendix F.

Weather Condition

– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.

2.3 Noise

2.3.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

Table 2.4 summarizes the monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of noise monitoring. The noise in A-weighted levels L_eq, L₁₀ and L₉₀ are recorded in a 30-minute interval between 0700 and 1900 hours.

Table 2.4: Noise Monitoring Parameters, Period and Frequency

Time Period	Parameters	Frequency
Daytime on normal weekdays (0700-1900 hours)	L_eq(30 min), L₉₀(30 min) & L₁₀ (30 min)	Once every week

Time Period

Parameters

Frequency

Daytime on normal weekdays

(0700-1900 hours)

L_eq(30 min), L₉₀(30 min) & L₁₀ (30 min)

Once every week

2.3.2 Monitoring Location

Currently, the works under the captioned project are confined in the western part of the WKCD site. Therefore, only the monitoring station NM1A was set up at the proposed location in accordance with updated EM&A Manual. Location of the monitoring station is given in Table 2.5 and shown in Figure 1.

Table 2.5: Noise Monitoring Station

Monitoring Station	Location
NM1A	Podium floor of International Commerce Centre (ICC)

2.3.3 Monitoring Equipment

Integrating Sound Level Meter was used for noise monitoring. It was a Type 1 sound level meter capable of giving a continuous readout of the noise level readings including equivalent continuous sound pressure level (L_Aeq) and percentile sound pressure level (L_x). They comply with International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:1979 (Type 1) and 804:1985 (Type 1). Table 2.6 summarizes the noise monitoring equipment model being used.

Table 2.6: Noise Monitoring Equipments

Monitoring Station	Equipment Model
Monitoring Station	Integrating Sound Level Meter	Calibrator
NM1	Rion NL-18 (Serial No.00360030)	Rion NC-73 (Serial No.10997142)

2.3.4 Monitoring Methodology

Field Monitoring

– The microphone of the Sound Level Meter was set at least 1.2 m above the ground.

– Free Field measurement was made at the monitoring locations.

– The battery condition was checked to ensure the correct functioning of the meter.

– Parameters such as frequency weighting, the time weighting and the measurement time were set as follows:

- frequency weighting: A

- time weighting: Fast

- time measurement: 30 minutes intervals (between 0700-1900 on normal weekdays)

– Prior to and after each noise measurement, the meter was calibrated using a Calibrator for 94 dB at 1 kHz. If the difference in the calibration level before and after measurement was more than 1 dB, the measurement would be considered invalid and has to be repeated after re-calibration or repair of the equipment.

– During the monitoring period, the L_eq, L₁₀ and L₉₀ were recorded. In addition, any site observations and noise sources were recorded on a standard record sheet.

– A correction of +3dB(A) was made to the free field measurements.

Maintenance and Calibration

– The microphone head of the sound level meter and calibrator is cleaned with soft cloth at quarterly intervals.

– The sound level meter and calibrator are sent to the supplier or HOKLAS laboratory to check and calibrate at yearly intervals.

– Calibration records are shown in Appendix F.

Weather Condition

– Meteorological data extracted from Hong Kong Observatory for the reporting month is provided in Appendix H.

2.4 Landscape and Visual

2.4.1 Monitoring Program

Table 2.7 details the monitoring program (as proposed in the WKCD EIA report) for landscape and visual impact during the construction phase.

Table 2.7: Monitoring Program for Landscape and Visual Impact during Construction Phase

Stage	Monitoring Task	Frequency	Report	Approval
Construction	Monitor implementation of proposed mitigation measures during the construction stage.	Bi-weekly	ET to report on Contractor’s compliance	Counter-signed by IEC

During the landscape and visual impact monitoring, any changes in relation to the landscape and visual amenity should be monitored with reference to the baseline conditions of the site. In addition, mitigation measures were proposed in the WKCD EIA report to minimise the landscape and visual impacts during the construction phase. The proposed mitigation measures as shown in Table 9.1 and Table 9.2 of the EM&A Manual should be checked for proper implementation.

3 Monitoring Results

3.1 Impact Monitoring

Construction impact monitoring for air quality, noise and landscape and visual impact was undertaken in compliance with the EM&A Manual during the reporting month.

3.2 Air Quality Monitoring

3.2.1 1-hour TSP

Results of 1-hour TSP at the monitoring location AM1 and AM2 are summarised in Table 3.1. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.

Table 3.1: Summary of 1-hour TSP monitoring results

Monitoring Station	Monitoring Date	Start Time	1-hour TSP (μg/m³)			Range (μg/m³)	Action Level (μg/m³)	Limit Level (μg/m³)
Monitoring Station	Monitoring Date	Start Time	1st Result	2nd Result	3rd Result	Range (μg/m³)	Action Level (μg/m³)	Limit Level (μg/m³)
AM1	02-Jun-16	10:38	64	61	55	51-64	273.7	500
	08-Jun-16	10:30	56	51	52
	14-Jun-16	10:30	56	59	61
	20-Jun-16	10:40	52	55	60
	24-Jun-16	8:15	52	59	60
	30-Jun-16	10:30	59	64	61
AM2	02-Jun-16	10:48	70	63	59	51-78	274.2	500
	08-Jun-16	10:37	61	58	54
	14-Jun-16	10:42	66	56	63
	20-Jun-16	10:50	58	62	57
	24-Jun-16	8:27	58	62	51
	30-Jun-16	10:40	69	72	78

3.2.2 24-hour TSP

Results of 24-hour TSP at the monitoring location AM1 and AM2 are summarised in Table 3.2. Graphical plots of the monitoring results are shown in Appendix G.

Table 3.2: Summary of 24-hour TSP monitoring results

Monitoring Station	Monitoring Date	Start Time	Monitoring Results (μg/m³)	Range (μg/m³)	Action Level (μg/m³)	Limit Level (μg/m³)
AM1	02-Jun-16	10:35	44	43-53	143.6	260
	08-Jun-16	10:32	51
	14-Jun-16	10:32	53
	20-Jun-16	10:38	47
	24-Jun-16	08:17	47
	30-Jun-16	10:32	43
AM2	02-Jun-16	10:50	51	44-58	151.1	260
	08-Jun-16	10:40	58
	14-Jun-16	10:44	49
	20-Jun-16	10:51	49
	24-Jun-16	08:30	44
	30-Jun-16	10:42	54

No exceedance of 1-hour and 24-hour TSP (Action or Limit Level) was recorded in the reporting period.

3.3 Noise Monitoring

The construction noise monitoring results at the monitoring location NM1A are summarized in Table 3.3. Graphical plots of the monitoring data and the station set-up of a free-field measurement are shown in Appendix G.

Table 3.3: Summary of noise monitoring results during normal weekdays

Monitoring Date	Start Time	End Time	L_eq (30 mins), dB(A)	Limit Level for L_eq (dB(A))
02-Jun-16	14:00	14:30	69.4	75
08-Jun-16	14:00	14:30	67.8
14-Jun-16	14:00	14:30	68.7
20-Jun-16	14:00	14:30	68.7
30-Jun-16	14:00	14:30	69.4

Remarks:

+3dB (A) correction was applied to free-field measurement.

No exceedance (Action/Limit Level) of construction noise was recorded in the reporting period as no noise related environmental complaint was received during the reporting period and noise levels recorded during the monitoring period were below 75 dB(A).

Construction works were extended to holidays on 5, 12, 19 and 26 June 2016. Additional monitoring was carried out during the restricted hours on 5, 12, 19 and 26 June 2016. The measured L_eq (30 mins) is in the range of 68.0 – 68.9 dB(A). Construction Noise Permit for the works carried out during restricted hours was obtained and listed in Table 4.3.

3.4 Landscape and Visual Impact

Landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted as part of the weekly site inspections on 10 and 23 June 2016 for M+ Museum and 7 and 22 June 2016 for Lyric Theatre Complex during the reporting month. As reviewed by the registered Landscape Architect, no adverse comment on landscape and visual aspects was made during these inspections.

The landscape and visual mitigation measures were implemented during the reporting period. The summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix J.

4 Environmental Site Inspection

4.1 Site Inspection

4.1.1 M+ Museum

Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 2, 10 (with follow-up inspection on 13 June), 16, 23 and 30 June 2016. The joint site inspection with IEC, ET, ER and Contractor was held on 10 June 2016. EPD site inspection with Contractor was conducted on 10, 21 and 22 June 2016. Items including overall drainage arrangements, water samples at discharge points and M66 stockpile area were inspected. A pink from has been issued to the Contractor on 10 June 2016 and water sample was collected at discharge point at ICP of M+ Museum by EPD. No non-compliance was recorded during the site inspection. All observations have been recorded in the site inspection checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate recommended mitigation measures where necessary. The key observations from the site inspections and associated recommendations are summarized in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1: Summary of Site Inspections and Recommendations for M+ Museum

Inspection Date	Parameter	Observation / Recommendation	Contactor’s Responses / Action(s) Undertaken	Close-out (Date)
2 Jun 2016	Air quality	The contractor was reminded to increase water spraying frequency to prevent dust impact.	The contractor has enhanced water spraying frequency in site area.	10 Jun 2016
2 Jun 2016	Waste management	Chemicals was found on bare gorund. The contractor should provide drip tray to store chemicals.	The contractor has removed the chemicals previously observed without drip trays.	3 Jun 2016
2 Jun 2016	Waste management	General refuse and construction waste was not properly stored on AEL. The contractor should have a good housekeeping of the site.	The contractor has removed the general refuse and construction waste on AEL.	3 Jun 2016
10 Jun 2016	Waste management	The drip tray of the generator was observed without plug. The contractor was reminded to provide plug for the drip tray.	Plug has been provided for the generator.	15 Jun 2016
10 Jun 2016	Water quality	The contractor was reminded to review the water treatment performance and ensure all site runoff/ wastewater are properly treated in accordance with WPCO requirement before the discharge.	The discharge water quality at discharge points at gate 1 and ICP was found clear and acceptable. All wastewater has been treated in wetseps to ensure acceptable water discharge quality.	23 Jun 2016
10 Jun 2016	Waste management	Some chemicals and a generator were observed without drip trays. The contractor was reminded to provied drip trays for all chemicals and generators on site.	The chemicals previously observed without drip trays has been removed. The generator has a built-in drip tray.	15 Jun 2016
10 Jun 2016	Noise	Two hand-held breakers were observed without noise label. The contractor was reminded to provide noise labels for the hand-held breakers with mass above 10kg.	The two hand-held breakers previously found without noise emission labels have been prohibited to be used and has been replaced.	15 Jun 2016
10 Jun 2016	Noise	No noise barrier or insulating fabric was provided for the breaking work at gate 1. The contractor was reminded to provide noise mitigation measure to reduce noise impact.	Noise insulating fabric has been provided for the breaking work at gate 1.	15 Jun 2016
13 Jun 2016	Water quality	Muddy water was observed discharging at discharge point at both gate 1 and ICP. The contractor was reminded to ensure the discharge quality to comply with the discharge standard of the discharge license. The contractor has switched off the pump at ICP during inspection. The contractor was reminded to disconnect the pipes with wastewater not being treated in wetseps from the discharge point immediately.	The discharge water quality at discharge points at gate 1 and ICP was found clear and acceptable. All wastewater has been treated in wetseps to ensure acceptable water discharge quality.	23 Jun 2016
13 Jun 2016	Water quality	There were excavation works near discharge point at gate 1. The contractor was reminded to provide preventive measures to prevent any soil or rock from entering the discharge point.	The excavation work previously observed at the discharge point was completed and filling materials has been provided.	15 Jun 2016
16 Jun 2016	Waste management	Chemicals were found without drip trays. The contractor was reminded to provide drip trays for all chemicals in site.	The contractor has removed chemicals previously observed without drip trays.	23 Jun 2016
16 Jun 2016	Water quality	The pH display of wetsep no.2 was found not function. The contractor was reminded to ensure proper functioning of pH display to monitor the function of wetsep.	The pH display of wetsep no. 2 has been repaired and it function properly.	23 Jun 2016
23 Jun 2016	Waste management	Chemicals stored at wetsep no.1 was found without drip tray. The contractor was reminded to remove the chemicals if not in use.	The chemicals previously storing at wetsep no.1 found without drip tray were removed.	28 June 2016
23 Jun 2016	Air quality	The stockpile at M66 was observed without any dust suppression mitigation measures. The contractor was reminded to apply dust suppression spraying to the stockpile.	Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month	On-going
30 June 2016	Waste management	Chemical without drip tray was found. The contractor was reminded to provide drip tray for the chemical.	Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month	On-going
30 June 2016	Water quality	The treated wastewater of wetsep no.4 was found with some floating particulates. The contractor was reminded to rectifiy it and ensure the quality of the treated wastewater to comply with the discharge license.	Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month	On-going
30 June 2016	Water quality	Some stagnant water/ wheel washing water was observed near vehicular entrance of M66. The contractor was reminded to provide wastewater collection facilities and apply proper wastewater treatment to the wastewater collected before discharge.	Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month	On-going

4.1.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Construction phase weekly site inspections were carried out on 1, 7, 17, 22 and 28 June 2016. The joint site inspection with IEC, ET, ER and Contractor was held on 17 June 2016. EPD site inspection with Contractor was conducted on 29 June 2016. Items including overall drainage system and chemical waste store were inspected. No non-compliance was recorded during the site inspection. All observations have been recorded in the site inspection checklist and passed to the Contractor together with the appropriate recommended mitigation measures where necessary. The key observations from the site inspections and associated recommendations are summarized in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2: Summary of Site Inspections and Recommendations for Lyric Theatre Complex

Inspection Date	Parameter	Observation / Recommendation	Contactor’s Responses / Action(s) Undertaken	Close-out (Date)
25 May 2016	Waste management	The contractor was reminded to securely seal the outer sides of the chemical storage area to prevent any leakage of chemicals.	Drip tray was provided to store the chemicals.	1 Jun 2016
1 Jun 2016	Air quality	The contractor was reminded to increase water spraying frequency to reduce dust impact.	The contractor has enhanced water spraying frequency.	2 Jun 2016
1 Jun 2016	Waste management	Oil leakage was found on the site. The contractor should remove it and treat it as chemical waste.	The contractor has removed the oil leakage found on ground.	2 Jun 2016
7 Jun 2016	Waste management	Some refuse was found on the ground. The contractor was reminded to maintain good housekeeping and can add more rubbish bins in site area.	The contractor has removed the refuse found on ground.	10 Jun 2016
7 Jun 2016	Water quality	Stagnant water was observed in some area in the site. The contractor was reminded to remove the stagnant water by using pump more frequently and especially in case of rainstorms.	The contractor has removed the stagnant water in the site.	10 Jun 2016
17 Jun 2016	General	The Environmental Permit copy at the site entrance was damaged and should be replaced with a new copy.	The EP has been replaced with a new copy.	20 Jun 2016
17 Jun 2016	Waste management	A drip tray was completely filled with stagnant water. The Contractor was reminded to clear the stagnant water at regular intervals to avoid overflow.	Stagnant water previously observed inside the drip tray has been cleared and the chemicals have been removed off site.	20 Jun 2016
17 Jun 2016	Water quality	Seepage of muddy site runoff under the site hoarding onto the public footpath was observed. The contractor was reminded to seal any leaks under the hoarding and clear the muddy runoff from the public footpath.	The muddy seepage previously observed has been rectified and the leakage point has been sealed.	20 Jun 2016
17 Jun 2016	Air quality	Haul road in Area L06 was dry. The contractor was reminded to wet the haul road to minimise dust emission.	Haul road previously dry in Area L06 has been sprayed with water regularly.	20 Jun 2016
22 Jun 2016	Air quality	The ground was observed dry and dusty. The contractor was reminded to enhance water spraying frequency to reduce dust impact.	The contractor has increased water spraying frequency to prevent dust impact.	28 Jun 2016
22 Jun 2016	Water quality	Some soil/ sand was observed on the ground near the discharge point. The contractor was reminded to replace the sand bags at the discharge point to prevent any leakage of sand from sand bags into the discharge point. Some stagnant water was observed near wetsep located near site entrance. The contractor was reminded to clear the stagnant water.	Sand bags were replaced and stagnant water was removed.	28 Jun 2016
28 Jun 2016	Noise	The panel of the power generator was found open. The contractor was reminded to close the panel of the generator to reduce noise impact.	Follow-up status will be provided in the next reporting month.	On-going

4.2 Advice on the Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status

The Contractors have been registered as a chemical waste producer for the Project. Construction and demolition (C&D) material sorting will be carried out on site. A sufficient number of receptacles were available for general refuse collection.

4.2.1 M+ Museum

As advised by the Contractor, 23.42 ton, 184.24 ton and 552.42 ton of inert C&D material were disposed of as public fill to Chai Wan Public Fill Barging Point, Tuen Mun Area 38 and Tseung Kwan O Area 137 Public Fill respectively, while 52.8 ton of general refuse was disposed of at SENT landfill. 106.6 ton of metals, 0.1 ton of paper/cardboard packaging, 0 ton of plastic and 14.6 ton of timber were collected by recycling contractors in the reporting month. 4,736.0 ton of inert C&D materials was reused on site. 2,384.0 ton of inert C&D materials was reused in other projects. 0 ton of chemical wastes was collected by licensed contractors in the reporting period.

The actual amounts of different types of waste generated by the activities of construction works at M+ Museum in the reporting month are shown in Appendix I.

4.2.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

As advised by the Contractor, 636.1 ton and 7964.7 ton of inert C&D material were disposed of as public fill to Tuen Mun Area 38 and Tseung Kwan O Area 137 respectively, while 13.5 ton of general refuse was disposed of at SENT landfill. 31.4 ton of metals, 0.1 ton of paper/cardboard packaging, 0 ton of plastic and 0 ton of timber were collected by recycling contractors in the reporting month. 0 ton of inert C&D materials was reused on site. 0 ton of inert C&D materials was reused in other projects. 0.5 ton of chemical wastes was collected by licensed contractors in the reporting period.

The actual amounts of different types of waste generated by the activities of construction works at Lyric Theatre Complex in the reporting month are shown in Appendix I.

4.3 Status of Environmental Licenses and Permits

The environmental permits, licenses, and/or notifications on environmental protection for this Project which were valid during the period are summarised in Table 4.3 and Table 4.4.

4.3.1 M+ Museum

Table 4.3: Status of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for M+ Museum

Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No.	Valid Period		Status	Remarks
Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No.	From	To	Status	Remarks
Chemical Waste Producer Registration
5213-217-H2913-45	05-Nov-15	--	Valid	--
Billing Account Construction Waste Disposal
7023393	13-Oct-15	--	Account Active	--
Construction Noise Permit
GW-RE0399-16	28-Apr-16	27-Oct-16	Cancelled on 2-Jun 16	--
GW-RE0554-16	2-Jun-16	1-Dec-16	Cancelled on 30-Jun 16	--
GW-RE0637-16	30-Jun-16	29-Dec-16	Vaild	--
Wastewater Discharge License
WT00023633-2016	4-Mar-16	31-Mar-21	Valid	--
Notification under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation
394083	7-Oct-15	--	Notified	--

4.3.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Table 4.4: Status of Environmental Submissions, Licenses and Permits for Lyric Theatre Complex

Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No.	Valid Period		Status	Remarks
Permit / License No. / Notification / Reference No.	From	To	Status	Remarks
Chemical Waste Producer Registration
5213-217-G2347-39	17-Feb-16	--	Valid	--
Billing Account Construction Waste Disposal
7024189	25-Jan-16	--	Account Active	--
Construction Noise Permit
GW-RE0402-16	25-Apr-16	24-Oct-16	Valid	--
Wastewater Discharge License
WT00023648-2016	9-Mar-16	31-Mar-21	Valid	--
Notification under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation
398075	18-Jan-16	--	Notified	--

4.4 Recommended Mitigation Measures

The EM&A programme followed the recommended mitigation measures in the EM&A Manual. The EM&A requirements as well as the summary of implementation status of the environmental mitigation measures are provided in Appendix J. In particular, the following mitigation measures were brought to attention during the site inspections:

4.4.1 M+ Museum

Chemical and Waste Management

– All chemicals stored on site should be provided with drip trays.

– Drip trays should be kept in good condition.

– Good housekeeping of site should be maintained.

Air Quality

– Maintain high standard of housekeeping to prevent emission of fugitive dust.

– Enhance water spraying frequency to reduce dust impact.

– All stockpile should be well covered or applied with dust suppression spraying to reduce dust impact.

Water Quality

– Wetsep units should be regularly checked to ensure proper function of the system to treat wastewater or runoff before discharge.

– All wastewater or site runoff must be treated in wastewater treatment facilities before discharging.

– All treated wastewater or runoff must be comply with the standard as stipulated in the discharge license.

– When there are excavation works near discharge point, appropriate measures should be in place to prevent any soil or rock from entering the discharge point.

– All wheel washing water should be collected for proper wastewater treatment before discharging.

Noise

– Noise emission lables must be provided for hand-held breakers of mass greater than 10 kg

– Noise barriers or noise insulating fabric should be used for all breaking works to reduce noise impact.

4.4.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Chemical and Waste Management

– All chemicals store on site should be provided with drip trays.

– Drip trays should be kept in good condition.

– Chemical waste in drip trays should be frequently removed and ensure no leakage of oil/ chemicals from machines.

– General refuse should be regularly removed.

Air Quality

– Enhance water spraying frequency to reduce dust impact.

Water Quality

– Stagnant water at the site should be regularly removed.

– No leakage of site runoff from the site near site boundary and discharge point should be ensured.

Noise

– The panel of the power generator should always be closed.

5 Compliance with Environmental Permit

The status of the required submission under the EP during the reporting period is summarized in Table 5.1.

Table 5.1: Status of Submissions under the Environmental Permit

EP Condition	Submission	Submission Date
Condition 3.4	Monthly EM&A Report for May 2016	14 June 2016

6 Report on Non-compliance, Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

6.1 Record on Non-compliance of Action and Limit Levels

There was no breach of Action or Limit Levels for Air Quality and Noise monitoring in the reporting month.

6.2 Record on Environmental Complaints Received

One environmental complaint was referred from EPD on 21 June 2016 in the reporting month. The complaint was handled in accordance with the EM&A Manual and relevant parties including the Engineer’s Representative and IEC were informed of the complaint.

The complainant claimed that muddy water was generated from the WKCDA construction sites and discharged to the harbour, and the location of the incident was near the Northern Ventilation Building of the Western Harbour Crossing. After investigation with the contractors, the wastewater treatment facilities at both M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex were checked. Therefore, it is considered that the muddy water discharged to the harbour is unlikely from M+ Museum and Lyric Theatre Complex. However, water quality mitigation measures would continue to be strictly implemented on-site to ensure the water discharge should comply with the standard as stipulated in the discharge license.

The cumulative statistics on complaints were provided in Appendix K.

6.3 Record on Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecution

No notifications of summons or successful prosecution were received this month. The cumulative statistics on notifications of summons and successful prosecutions were provided in Appendix K.

7 Future Key Issues

7.1 Construction Works for the Coming Month(s)

7.1.1 M+ Museum

The major site works scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

¡ Excavation

¡ Construction of pile caps

¡ Installation/ removal of strut of lateral support

¡ Construction of slab

¡ Construction of core wall

7.1.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

The major site works scheduled to be commissioned in the coming month include:

¡ H-Pile Construction

¡ Bored Pile Construction

¡ Excavation and lateral support

7.2 Key Issues for the Coming Month

7.2.1 M+ Museum

Key issues to be considered in the coming month include:

¡ Generation of dust from construction works;

¡ Noise impact from operating equipment and machinery on-site;

¡ Generation of site surface runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;

¡ Management of stockpiles and slopes, particularly on rainy days;

¡ Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste; and

¡ Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site.

7.2.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

Key issues to be considered in the coming month include:

¡ Generation of dust from construction works;

¡ Noise impact from operating equipment and machinery on-site;

¡ Generation of site surface runoffs and wastewater from activities on-site;

¡ Management of stockpiles and slopes, particularly on rainy days;

¡ Sorting, recycling, storage and disposal of general refuse and construction waste; and

¡ Management of chemicals and avoidance of oil spillage on-site.

7.3 Monitoring Schedule for the Coming Month

The environmental site inspection and environmental monitoring will be continued in the coming month. Impact monitoring for air quality and noise in accordance with the approved EM&A Manual has commenced since 31 October 2015 and 5 March 2016 respectively. The tentative monitoring schedule for the coming month is shown in the Appendix E.

8 Conclusions and Recommendations

8.1 Conclusions

The EM&A programme as recommended in the EM&A Manual has been undertaken since the construction of M+ Museum main works commenced on 31 October 2015, and the construction of Lyric Therate Complex foundation works commenced on 1 March 2016.

Monitoring of air quality and noise with respect to the Projects is underway. In particular, the 1-hour TSP, 24-hour TSP, noise level (as Leq, 30 minutes) under monitoring have been checked against established Action and Limit levels. There was no breach of Action and Limit Levels for 1-hour TSP, 24-hour TSP and noise in the reporting month.

One environmental complaint and no notifications of summons or successful prosecution were received during the reporting month.

Weekly construction phase site inspections and bi-weekly landscape and visual impact inspections were conducted during the reporting month as required. It was observed that the Contractors had implemented all possible and feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the potential environmental impacts during construction phase works.

A pink form was issued to the Contractor of M+ Museum on 10 June 2016 and water sample at discharge point at ICP of M+ Museum was collected by EPD.

1 Introduction

1.1 Background

1.2 Project Organisation

1.3 Environmental Status in the Reporting Period

1.4 Summary of EM&A Requirements

2 Impact Monitoring Methodology

2.1 Introduction

2.2 Air Quality

2.2.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

2.2.2 Monitoring Locations

2.2.3 Monitoring Equipment

2.2.4 Monitoring Methodology

2.3 Noise

2.3.1 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration

2.3.2 Monitoring Location

2.3.3 Monitoring Equipment

2.3.4 Monitoring Methodology

2.4 Landscape and Visual

2.4.1 Monitoring Program

3 Monitoring Results

3.1 Impact Monitoring

3.2 Air Quality Monitoring

3.2.1 1-hour TSP

3.2.2 24-hour TSP

3.3 Noise Monitoring

3.4 Landscape and Visual Impact

4 Environmental Site Inspection

4.1 Site Inspection

4.1.1 M+ Museum

4.1.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

4.2 Advice on the Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status

4.2.1 M+ Museum

4.2.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

4.3 Status of Environmental Licenses and Permits

4.3.1 M+ Museum

4.3.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

4.4 Recommended Mitigation Measures

4.4.1 M+ Museum

4.4.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

5 Compliance with Environmental Permit

6 Report on Non-compliance, Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

6.1 Record on Non-compliance of Action and Limit Levels

6.2 Record on Environmental Complaints Received

6.3 Record on Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecution

7 Future Key Issues

7.1 Construction Works for the Coming Month(s)

7.1.1 M+ Museum

7.1.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

7.2 Key Issues for the Coming Month

7.2.1 M+ Museum

7.2.2 Lyric Theatre Complex

7.3 Monitoring Schedule for the Coming Month

8 Conclusions and Recommendations

8.1 Conclusions

8.2 Recommendations